Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » rec.bicycles.misc » rec.bicycles.misc archive
rec.bicycles.misc archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.misc usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!














 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16.-2003
Bob M
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pearl Izumi Microsensor Shorts (long)

I bought two pairs of these shorts. The good news: I really like the material, which the lady at the
LBS said "kept you 10 degrees cooler." While I doubt the veracity of that statement, they don't seem
as hot as other shorts, and the way they've done the seems is excellent. The bad news: The pair of
shorts I bought from the LBS is a 2002 model. The pair I bought from Performance Bike is a 2003
model. For the 2003 model, they put a material on top of the chamois. So, both shorts have the same
"3D" pattern, but the 3D pattern is "built in" to the chamois in the 2002 model. In the 2003 model,
they attach the 3D part to the chamois. This is a bad idea. This short is the first short that's
caused me saddle sores. Last week, my 35 mile ride on the 2003 model was quite painful; this week,
my 40 mile ride on the 2002 model wasn't. I recommend taking a hard look at these before you buy.

--
Bob M in CT remove 'x.' to reply


Pearl Izumi Microsensor Shorts (long)







  #2  
Old 08-16.-2003
Pat
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Pearl Izumi Microsensor Shorts (long)

x-no-archive:yes

> I bought two pairs of these shorts. The good news: I really like the material, which the lady at
> the LBS said "kept you 10 degrees cooler." While I doubt the veracity of that statement, they
> don't seem as hot as other shorts, and the way they've done the seems is excellent. The bad news:
> The pair of shorts I bought from the LBS is a 2002 model. The pair I bought from Performance Bike
> is a 2003 model. For the 2003 model, they put a material on top of the chamois. So, both shorts
> have the same "3D" pattern, but the 3D pattern is "built in" to the chamois in the 2002
model.
> In the 2003 model, they attach the 3D part to the chamois. This is a bad
> idea. This short is the first short that's caused me saddle sores. Last
> week, my 35 mile ride on the 2003 model was quite painful; this week, my
40
> mile ride on the 2002 model wasn't. I recommend taking a hard look at these before you buy.
>
> --
> Bob M in CT

These are the ones that cost around $119, right? I bought a pair at a Pearl Izumi shop. I liked them
so much that I just bought a second pair from Performance. I love these shorts! The padding is much
smaller than on most bike shorts---I don't feel as if I am wearing a diaper anymore. So far, so
good: no saddle sores, no moving around or bunching up. The only gripe I have with them is that the
legs are a little long for my taste.

Pat in TX
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.
Automatic translations delivered by NLP-er
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish