Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » rec.bicycles.misc » rec.bicycles.misc archive
rec.bicycles.misc archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.misc usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!













Here we go again!

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23.-2003
Alan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Here we go again!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in531381.shtml

(AP) Frequent mountain biking may reduce fertility in men, according to a small Austrian study that
adds fodder to a debate over cycling and male sexual function.

--

alan

Anyone who believes in a liberal media has never read the "Daily Oklahoman."
  #2  
Old 01-23.-2003
Jobst Brandt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

Alan Smithee writes:

> (AP) Frequent mountain biking may reduce fertility in men, according to a small Austrian study
> that adds fodder to a debate over cycling and male sexual function.

This sounds like the beginning of saddles with holes and slots in the surface to accommodate the
testicles and protect the urethra... more than 100 years ago. Don't jest. Specialized exhumed that
story a couple of years ago to start their assault on bicycle saddles that, as sheep go, was copied
by nearly all saddle makers who put fart slots in the rear and some with labia majora and urethra
pinch slots in the nose of the saddle. The axiom of ignoring history applies.

Jobst Brandt <jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> Palo Alto CA
  #3  
Old 01-23.-2003
Zippy The Pinhe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message news:fGVG9.52394$Ik.1442499@typhoon.sonic.net...
> Alan Smithee writes:
>
> > (AP) Frequent mountain biking may reduce fertility in men, according to a small Austrian study
> > that adds fodder to a debate over cycling and male sexual function.
>
> The axiom of ignoring history applies.

Doesn't it give you a warm fuzzy feeling to know that so many well-meaning people are so very
concerned about our cojones?
  #4  
Old 01-23.-2003
Prof. Wilhelm V
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message news:fGVG9.52394$Ik.1442499@typhoon.sonic.net...
> Alan Smithee writes:
>
> > (AP) Frequent mountain biking may reduce fertility in men, according to a small Austrian study
> > that adds fodder to a debate over cycling and male sexual function.
>
> This sounds like the beginning of saddles with holes and slots in the surface to accommodate the
> testicles and protect the urethra... more than 100 years ago.

Jobst what kind of saddle did you use back then? <g>

Prof
  #5  
Old 01-23.-2003
Andrew Price
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

<jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message news:fGVG9.52394$Ik.1442499@typhoon.sonic.net...

>... was copied by nearly all saddle makers who put fart slots in the rear and some with labia
>majora and urethra pinch slots in the nose of the saddle.

Interesting that the naming of some useless bicycle parts varies with the jurisdiction.

In Oz such saddles have become known as Beaver Breathers, and even more curiously seem to be
increasingly fashionable among male riders with lots of miles in their legs.

My observation is that most discomfort can be fixed by a person experienced in fitting cycles to
humans - particularly if they fit a lot of truthless who seem to get very vocal very quickly if the
seat is causing grief and are fairly direct in expressing unhappiness about their bikes.

Fashion was ever a false god.

best Andrew (remove the .x1 to reply)
  #6  
Old 01-23.-2003
Terry Rudd
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

Zippy the Pinhead wrote:
> <jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message
> news:fGVG9.52394$Ik.1442499@typhoon.sonic.net...
>
>>Alan Smithee writes:
>>
>>
>>>(AP) Frequent mountain biking may reduce fertility in men, according to a small Austrian study
>>>that adds fodder to a debate over cycling and male sexual function.
>>
>>The axiom of ignoring history applies.
>
>
> Doesn't it give you a warm fuzzy feeling to know that so many well-meaning people are so very
> concerned about our cojones?

Well I know of one person who has had their testicles bruised by a saddle with the slot cut in so I
am not so sure they don't offset one type of "alleged damage" with another more readily observable
type. I liken this to the level of hype, which has created the rabid lemming like behavior around
bicycle helmets. The gimmickry around ergonomic bicycles seats is much like most modern consumer
focused "safety enhancement, a few grains of truth mixed in with a barn full of marketing silage.

Terry (tired of our nanny nation) Rudd

>
>
  #7  
Old 01-23.-2003
Andrew Price
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

"Andrew Price" <arathorn@bigpond.net.au.x1> wrote in message
news:gR_G9.14915$q43.41513@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> <jobst.brandt@stanfordalumni.org> wrote in message
> news:fGVG9.52394$Ik.1442499@typhoon.sonic.net...
>
> >... was copied by nearly all saddle makers who put fart slots in the rear and some with labia
> >majora and urethra pinch slots in the nose of the saddle.
>
> Interesting that the naming of some useless bicycle parts varies with the jurisdiction.
>
> In Oz such saddles have become known as Beaver Breathers, and even more curiously seem to be
> increasingly fashionable among male riders with lots
of
> miles in their legs.
>
> My observation is that most discomfort can be fixed by a person
experienced
> in fitting cycles to humans - particularly if they fit a lot of truthless who seem to get very
> vocal very quickly if the seat is causing grief and
are
> fairly direct in expressing unhappiness about their bikes.
>
> Fashion was ever a false god.
>
> best Andrew (remove the .x1 to reply)

Sorry - for truthless read triathletes, a word my spell checker fails to recognise ...
  #8  
Old 01-23.-2003
Alex Rodriguez
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Here we go again!

In article <ashb79013ml@enews3.newsguy.com>, uce@NOSPAM.ftc.gov says...

>Doesn't it give you a warm fuzzy feeling to know that so many well-meaning people are so very
>concerned about our cojones?

Not when those well meaning people are trying to charge double or triple the price. My cojones are
just fine without their unecessary saddle modifications.
-----------------
Alex __O _-\<,_ (_)/ (_)
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 PM.
Translated to other languages thanks to vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish