Is Hinault behind the divorce?

I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump on Lance. Hinault never wanted Lance to
equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I think he might just do something drastic like accidently drive
over him, to prevent a 6th Tour de France win.

Callistus Valerius wrote:

> I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump on Lance. Hinault never wanted
> Lance to equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I think he might just do something drastic like
> accidently drive over him, to prevent a 6th Tour de France win.

So, you're saying he was badgered into it?

On 07 Sep 2003 14:58:30 GMT, Richard Adams <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote:

>Callistus Valerius wrote:
>
>> I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump on Lance. Hinault never wanted
>> Lance to equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I think he might just do something drastic like
>> accidently drive over him, to prevent a 6th Tour de France win.
>
>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?

Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of the morons who participate here ;-)

hahaha! Badger. hahah!!!

Keith wrote:
> On 07 Sep 2003 14:58:30 GMT, Richard Adams <ackthpt@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Callistus Valerius wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump on Lance. Hinault never wanted
>>> Lance to equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I think he might just do something drastic like
>>> accidently drive over him, to prevent a 6th Tour de France win.
>>
>>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
>
>
> Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of the morons who participate
> here ;-)

Maybe he was sett up?

"Stewart Fleming" <stf@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message news:1062974738.518915@ns...
> Keith wrote:
> > On 07 Sep 2003 14:58:30 GMT, Richard Adams
<ackthpt@concentric.net>
> > wrote:
> >>Callistus Valerius wrote:
> >>> I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump
on Lance.
> >>>Hinault never wanted Lance to equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I
think he
> >>>might just do something drastic like accidently drive over him,
to prevent a
> >>>6th Tour de France win.
> >>
> >>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
> >
> > Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of
the
> > morons who participate here ;-)
>
> Maybe he was sett up?

Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?

Tom Kunich wrote:
> "Stewart Fleming" <stf@cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message news:1062974738.518915@ns...
>
>>Keith wrote:
>>
>>>On 07 Sep 2003 14:58:30 GMT, Richard Adams
>
> <ackthpt@concentric.net>
>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Callistus Valerius wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm positive it was Hinault who told the podium girl to jump
>
> on Lance.
>
>>>>>Hinault never wanted Lance to equal his number of Tour de France wins, and I
>
> think he
>
>>>>>might just do something drastic like accidently drive over him,
>
> to prevent a
>
>>>>>6th Tour de France win.
>>>>
>>>>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
>>>
>>>Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of
>
> the
>
>>>morons who participate here ;-)
>>
>>Maybe he was sett up?
>
>
> Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?

Maybe not, but I never pass up the opportunity to make a pun. I'm just saddened that I couldn't work
in a Watership Down reference as well.

>> >>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
>> >
>> > Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of
>the
>> > morons who participate here ;-)
>>
>> Maybe he was sett up?
>
>Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?

Well the idiot still has a wife, so why dont' t you go back to your pigsty Kunich, I don't think you
deserve a sett.

"Keith" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4dvplvkc0kvho1tnfrtnr683udev79se41@4ax.com...
> >> >>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
> >> >
> >> > Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most of
> >the
> >> > morons who participate here ;-)
> >>
> >> Maybe he was sett up?
> >
> >Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?
>
> Well the idiot still has a wife, so why dont' t you go back to your pigsty Kunich, I don't think
> you deserve a sett.

You are about the only person here that is more hostile and openly misogynist than Kunich. You make
Kunich seem mainstream.

these 'tards can't possibly know it".

Dream on Keith. Go back to throwing darts at the NOW's event publicity posters.

Yeah, but you really have to hand it to Stewart who over reached even himself in the very indirect
reference to The Cold Moons.

"Nick Burns" <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f5d1e34$0$63808$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com...
>
> "Keith" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:4dvplvkc0kvho1tnfrtnr683udev79se41@4ax.com...
> > >> >>So, you're saying he was badgered into it?
> > >> >
> > >> > Excellent, but that subtle wordplay is probably lost on most
of
> > >the
> > >> > morons who participate here ;-)
> > >>
> > >> Maybe he was sett up?
> > >
> > >Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?
> >
> > Well the idiot still has a wife, so why dont' t you go back to
your
> > pigsty Kunich, I don't think you deserve a sett.
>
> You are about the only person here that is more hostile and openly misogynist than Kunich. You
> make Kunich seem mainstream.
>

all of
> these 'tards can't possibly know it".
>
> Dream on Keith. Go back to throwing darts at the NOW's event
publicity
> posters.

>Yeah, but you really have to hand it to Stewart who over reached even himself in the very indirect
>reference to The Cold Moons.

I knew that would shut you up.

>> > >Stewart! Do you really suppose that idiot Keith has any idea what you're talking about?
>> >
>> > Well the idiot still has a wife, so why dont' t you go back to
>your
>> > pigsty Kunich, I don't think you deserve a sett.
>>
>> You are about the only person here that is more hostile and openly misogynist than Kunich. You
>> make Kunich seem mainstream.