notorious Texas playboy - Page 4

On Jun 26, 2:03*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 10:23*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 26, 9:42*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 25, 10:55*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>,
> > > > *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Jun 24, 10:07*pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups..com>,
> > > > > > > *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 1:44*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > [I]f you are
> > > > > > > > > familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news
> > > > > > > > > coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven
> > > > > > > > > the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly
> > > > > > > > > devoted to Stupid ****.
>
> > > > > > > > Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy forexample:
> > > > > > > >http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/...erIssuesJanuar...
>
> > > > > > > > "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural
> > > > > > > > phenomenon."
>
> > > > > > > > Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand.
>
> > > > > > > One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his
> > > > > > > rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier.
>
> > > > > > Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a link to a 25
> > > > > > page eye-glazing .pdf?
> > > > > > -Paul
>
> > > > > Yes.
>
> > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...racy-as-histor
> > > > > ical-phenomenon.html>
>
> > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...letter-to-open
> > > > > -minded-progressives.html>
>
> > > > > It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly.
>
> > > > > I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think
> > > > > he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways.
>
> > > > > In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein
> > > > > or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideas are
> > > > > devilishly attractive.
>
> > > > He mentions violence and has little to say about it.
> > > > I propose the formal view of violence: an individual
> > > > condones, incites, offers, and does violence because
> > > > he feels like it.
>
> >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2...l_version.html
>
> > > So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and
> > > you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt
> > > like it"?
>
> > > I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal
> > > philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto
> > > you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest".
>
> > Big notDumbThisTime Paul,
>
> > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden
> > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the
> > negative phrasing of it.
> > No one cares or understands how it arose or
> > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because
> > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme
> > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in
> > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately
> > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough.
>
> > Everyone's friend,
> > SoTS
>
> Interesting. I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision
> focused on "Me Me Me!". *People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare
> cactus typically treat people the same way.

What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to
be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. Should you ever wish to take
measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag.

On Jun 27, 10:43*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2:03*pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 26, 10:23*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 26, 9:42*am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jun 25, 10:55*pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>,
> > > > > *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jun 24, 10:07*pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article
> > > > > > > > <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > > > > > > *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 1:44*pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > [I]f you are
> > > > > > > > > > familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news
> > > > > > > > > > coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven
> > > > > > > > > > the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly
> > > > > > > > > > devoted to Stupid ****.
>
> > > > > > > > > Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy for example:
> > > > > > > > >http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/...erIssuesJanuar...
>
> > > > > > > > > "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural
> > > > > > > > > phenomenon."
>
> > > > > > > > > Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand.
>
> > > > > > > > One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his
> > > > > > > > rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier.
>
> > > > > > > Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a linkto a 25
> > > > > > > page eye-glazing .pdf?
> > > > > > > -Paul
>
> > > > > > Yes.
>
> > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...racy-as-histor
> > > > > > ical-phenomenon.html>
>
> > > > > > <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...letter-to-open
> > > > > > -minded-progressives.html>
>
> > > > > > It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly.
>
> > > > > > I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think
> > > > > > he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways.
>
> > > > > > In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein
> > > > > > or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideasare
> > > > > > devilishly attractive.
>
> > > > > He mentions violence and has little to say about it.
> > > > > I propose the formal view of violence: an individual
> > > > > condones, incites, offers, and does violence because
> > > > > he feels like it.
>
> > >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2...l_version.html
>
> > > > So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and
> > > > you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt
> > > > like it"?
>
> > > > I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal
> > > > philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto
> > > > you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest".
>
> > > Big notDumbThisTime Paul,
>
> > > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden
> > > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the
> > > negative phrasing of it.
> > > No one cares or understands how it arose or
> > > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because
> > > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme
> > > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in
> > > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately
> > > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough.
>
> > > Everyone's friend,
> > > SoTS
>
> > Interesting. I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision
> > focused on "Me Me Me!". *People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare
> > cactus typically treat people the same way.
>
> What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to
> be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. *Should you ever wish to take
> measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag.

Whatever, you right wing bastard with your 50 mpg clown car. ;-)
-Paul

On Jun 27, 12:52 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 10:43 am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 2:03 pm, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
>
> > > ...I have you pegged you as someone with tunnel vision
> > > focused on "Me Me Me!". People who think nothing of bulldozing a rare
> > > cactus typically treat people the same way.
>
> > What looked like a blooper about cactus to you and Bill turned out to
> > be a linedrive sizzling over your heads. Should you ever wish to take
> > measure of the shot, it landed at the property marker flag.
>
> Whatever, you right wing bastard with your 50 mpg clown car. ;-)

It is a tragedy that the ball has rolled into the commons.

I do luv my clown car.

On Jun 26, 10:52*am, Fred Fredburger
<FredFredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos> wrote:
> SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 26, 9:42 am, "Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 25, 10:55 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >>> In article
> >>> <rcousine-5094DD.17522625062008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>,
> >>> *Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article
> >>>> <6e75ce1a-c705-4a9c-8679-67f417714...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>> *"Paul G." <carb...@egine.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Jun 24, 10:07 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In article
> >>>>>> <928b702c-311d-474e-adf5-3a921ba39...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>>>> *SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jun 24, 1:44 pm, "b...@mambo.ucolick.org" <b...@mambo.ucolick.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> [I]f you are
> >>>>>>>> familiar with the NYT from the front of the book (news
> >>>>>>>> coverage), you may not realize that in fact it does leaven
> >>>>>>>> the serious paper-of-record stuff with articles explicitly
> >>>>>>>> devoted to Stupid ****.
> >>>>>>> Yeah, like peppering the pages with stuff from this guy for example:
> >>>>>>>http://www.econjournalwatch.org/pdf/...erIssuesJanuar...
> >>>>>>> "Investigating him is a way of investigating the larger cultural
> >>>>>>> phenomenon."
> >>>>>>> Indeed -- the NYT sometimes informs us by the left hand.
> >>>>>> One of these days SoS is going to discover Mencious Moldbug, and his
> >>>>>> rhetoric here is just going to get way, way crazier.
> >>>>> Way crazier than attempting to make a point by posting a link to a 25
> >>>>> page eye-glazing .pdf?
> >>>>> -Paul
> >>>> Yes.
> >>>> <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...racy-as-histor
> >>>> ical-phenomenon.html>
> >>>> <http://unqualified-reservations.blog...letter-to-open
> >>>> -minded-progressives.html>
> >>>> It would have been easier to find had I spelled it properly.
> >>>> I don't actually think Mencius Moldbug is _right_, per se, but I think
> >>>> he is wrong in maddeningly fascinating ways.
> >>>> In my dark moments, I suspect he's a moderate conservative's Naomi Klein
> >>>> or Noam Chomsky: you think you disagree with him, but his ideas are
> >>>> devilishly attractive.
> >>> He mentions violence and has little to say about it.
> >>> I propose the formal view of violence: an individual
> >>> condones, incites, offers, and does violence because
> >>> he feels like it.
>
> >http://www.2blowhards.com/archives/2...l_version.html
>
> >> So if someone was beating you and attempting to take your wallet, and
> >> you defended yourself by fighting back, it would be because "you felt
> >> like it"?
>
> >> I propose the formal view of not just violence, but a formal
> >> philosophy of life: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto
> >> you." *From this flows "enlightened self-interest".
>
> > Big notDumbThisTime Paul,
>
> > I've brought up this bedrock moral value -- also known as the golden
> > rule -- before in this forum, although I personally prefer the
> > negative phrasing of it. *No one cares or understands how it arose or
> > works as an interpersonal (social) rule of conduct. *That's because
> > rbr, like everywhere else, is loaded up with impaired capacity we-meme
> > borgites. *Or maybe they are just plain dumb, or were trained in
> > publik skools, or who knows???... (Me.) *I hope I have adequately
> > insulted folks, although it never seems to be enough.
>
> > Everyone's friend,
> > SoTS
>
> Face it, Slave: You are one of we.

http://blog.mises.org/archives/008233.asp

> An explanation requested: How does being a we-meme borgite prevent
> someone from understanding "Do unto others ..." or, conversely, how does
> NOT being a WMB aid understanding?
>
> I've got my own ideas, but they're tied up with religion and I suspect
> that yours are not.

I suspect your suspicions are correct.