| rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
Tom Sherman wrote: > Rick Onanian wrote: >> MAPLE or SPRUCE may be stronger. > > How wood you know? That should finish this. Bill "going against the grain" S. |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:30:51 -0500, Tom Sherman <tsherman@qconline.com> wrote: >> MAPLE or SPRUCE may be stronger. > >How wood you know? I'm in the construction business, so I mite (is that the best I can come up with?) know this sort of stuff. Er, seriously, engineers insist that kiln dried spruce is stronger, but it sure is brittle. IME, hem fir has proven itself to be much tougher, and I've yet to load KD spruce in any direction where it's stronger than hem fir. I hope you aren't board (hah! better...) of my lumbering (woo hoo!) prose. -- Rick Onanian |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:38 PM.
Translations delivered by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Translations delivered by vB Enterprise Translator 3.2.2
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode


















