| rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Says 610 on the rim label. I get 614 using Spocalc's method. Do rim manufacturers generally include the thickness of the nipple head in ERD? If they don't, and since Spocalc does, that would explain the discrepancy. Kyle |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
kbh-<< Do rim manufacturers generally include the thickness of the nipple head in ERD? ERD is nipple seat to nipple seat across the rim-what kinda nipp shouldn't matter- Try a wheelsmith rod to measure- Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
The "effective" in "effective rim diameter" is there because the dimension is *not* taken on any rim surface. ERD is correctly measured to the "ideal" location of the ends of all the spokes. For most that includes nipple heads, as shown on http://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/s...asureHubAndRim. "KBH" <kbh9@hollasch.com> wrote in message news:<isQta.32918$pa5.33324@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>... > Says 610 on the rim label. I get 614 using Spocalc's method. > > Do rim manufacturers generally include the thickness of the nipple head in ERD? > > If they don't, and since Spocalc does, that would explain the discrepancy. > > Kyle |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















