| rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded for long rides. For Road. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
I wear the Hind Ultra Drylete and I think they are great! My longest ride to date is about 75km and not one single problem from the shorts. I just purchased my second pair so that there's always a clean set ready to go. Joel "M.E.H." <hayesbuildingco@netzero.net> wrote in message news:94190ca2.0305120708.38b338ea@posting.google.com... > Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > for long rides. For Road. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
> Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > for long rides. For Road. I like the BioRacer bibshorts with Airstripe chamois, it's a one piece chamois so no stitchings in sensitive areas etc. The short is made out of six parts and fits very well. http://www.bioracer.com/Nederlands/T...p?clothes_item =110 "M.E.H." <hayesbuildingco@netzero.net> wrote in message news:94190ca2.0305120708.38b338ea@posting.google.com... > Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > for long rides. For Road. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
FYI, Velo News has a nice article comparing various brands of bib-shorts. IIRC, the Santini and Pearl Izumi scored well. I prefer PI standard (non-bib) fieldsensor shorts.-- Jay Beattie. "M.E.H." <hayesbuildingco@netzero.net> wrote in message news:94190ca2.0305120708.38b338ea@posting.google.com... > Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > for long rides. For Road. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
"Jay Beattie" <jbeattie@lindsayhart.com> wrote in message news:vbvjd03unaov2f@corp.supernews.com... > FYI, Velo News has a nice article comparing various brands of bib-shorts. IIRC, the Santini and > Pearl Izumi scored well. I prefer PI standard (non-bib) fieldsensor shorts.-- Jay Beattie. Me too, I think PI FieldSensor/Ultrasensor is the "gold standard". Since the PI are so expensive (they do last forever, though), I got a pair of Voler shorts (direct, through Voler.com) in December. Half the price, so far so good, although I haven't done any serious rides in them yet. I've done a few 250 mile rides in the PI's. The PI's I really like are made from an unusual fabric, which has a coarse texture, I think they were originally meant for MTB wear (not baggy though). They wear like iron, and are actually very comfortable, even in the heat. I'd like to get some more, but PI doesn't seem to make them, and I haven't seen any others like them. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
M.E.H. wrote: > Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > for long rides. For Road. There is no one soliution for everyone. Why don't you buy one PI and one Hind. Wear them for awhile and see which pair you can't wait to wash and re-wear instead of the other that is now occupying space or for emergency wear only. I started out with Performance, then tried and adopted PI Attack. I just bought my first Hind Drylete Lite (all eight panel). There is an amazing difference in the crotch area fitting and bulkiness. The short fabric itself is relatively the same. jim |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
"Peter Cole" <petercole@nospamatallattbi.com> wrote in message news:ynRva.562823$OV.535825@rwcrnsc54... > "Jay Beattie" <jbeattie@lindsayhart.com> wrote in message > news:vbvjd03unaov2f@corp.supernews.com... > > FYI, Velo News has a nice article comparing various brands of bib-shorts. IIRC, the Santini and > > Pearl Izumi scored well. I prefer PI standard (non-bib) fieldsensor shorts.-- Jay Beattie. > > Me too, I think PI FieldSensor/Ultrasensor is the "gold standard". I tried two pair of those, and ended up having to give them to a friend. For whatever reason, any time I rode more than about 20 miles or so, they would literally cut my ass. Something on the edge of the chamois was sawing a 1" long laceration into my outer cheek...quite literally a PITA. I liked the shorts in every other respect, but found them impossible to wear. My friend wears them with no problems...just goes to show that every body is different. > > Since the PI are so expensive (they do last forever, though), I got a pair of > Voler shorts (direct, through Voler.com) in December. Half the price, so far > so good, although I haven't done any serious rides in them yet. I've done a > few 250 mile rides in the PI's. > > The PI's I really like are made from an unusual fabric, which has a coarse texture, I think they > were originally meant for MTB wear (not baggy though). > They wear like iron, and are actually very comfortable, even in the heat. I'd > like to get some more, but PI doesn't seem to make them, and I haven't seen > any others like them. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
Sugoi Technifine. I have tried them all! These are the best for longer saddle time. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
M.E.H. wrote: >Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded for >long rides. For Road. > > Nobody's voted for Canari, but I sure like mine. They're either the Elite or the Vortex, I'm not sure, but the fit is great and the chamois is very comfortable. Are Canari's not a popular brand? They are hard to find, though, and that's a pain. Just curious, Sandy |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
Sandy Christmus <slxmus@nocoxspam.net> wrote in message news:<3EC05DD6.30908@nocoxspam.net>... > M.E.H. wrote: > > >Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > >for long rides. For Road. Wow! This is really odd, but I've been mentally composing an original post requesting info. about bike shorts for several days now and decided to post it tonight. Now it won't have to be original. I'm not wild about tight road shorts even though I've worn them for years. I despise baggies. It used to be possible in the '80s & early '90s to buy bike shorts that looked like hiking shorts w/ bellows pockets & / or other pockets. My favorites were Hinds. Does anyone make these today? I assume that this is a subject that it would be ok to cross post. If so which other groups would be suitable? Any info. greatly appreciated. John |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
"John McGraw" <dudleydorite9@Yahoo.com> wrote in message news:9ef657ec.0305130024.34cba938@posting.google.com... > Sandy Christmus <slxmus@nocoxspam.net> wrote in message news:<3EC05DD6.30908@nocoxspam.net>... > > M.E.H. wrote: > > > > >Any body have a preference in brand of riding shorts. Which are most comforable and well padded > > >for long rides. For Road. > > Wow! This is really odd, but I've been mentally composing an original post requesting info. about > bike shorts for several days now and decided to post it tonight. Now it won't have to be original. > > I'm not wild about tight road shorts even though I've worn them for years. I despise baggies. It > used to be possible in the '80s & early '90s to buy bike shorts that looked like hiking shorts w/ > bellows pockets & / or other pockets. My favorites were Hinds. Does anyone make these today? > > I assume that this is a subject that it would be ok to cross post. If so which other groups would > be suitable? > > Any info. greatly appreciated. John I got a pair of Hind courior shorts which have the pockets and long inseem to keep knees covered from the sun a few months ago, very good short but they are baggy. Best part about them is they are white/sand color, I hate dark shorts just makes you sweat more and hides the ticks. Got them at Performance 79 marked down to 30, wish I bought two pairs! I also don't use those garish stupid looking racing jerseys. Just long sleave polypro tee zips AKA winter underwear, can be found at rei/... for 15$ and works excellent in white while riding the sunny hot hills of California. Tauras http://www.kcbx.net/~tsulaiti/surfreport/ -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
"GaryG" <gary_g@charter_NOSPAMX_.net> wrote in message news:vc02dkjl69qpfd@corp.supernews.com... > "Peter Cole" <petercole@nospamatallattbi.com> wrote in message > news:ynRva.562823$OV.535825@rwcrnsc54... > > "Jay Beattie" <jbeattie@lindsayhart.com> wrote in message > > news:vbvjd03unaov2f@corp.supernews.com... > > > FYI, Velo News has a nice article comparing various brands of bib-shorts. IIRC, the Santini > > > and Pearl Izumi scored well. I prefer PI > > > standard (non-bib) fieldsensor shorts.-- Jay Beattie. > > > > Me too, I think PI FieldSensor/Ultrasensor is the "gold standard". > > I tried two pair of those, and ended up having to give them to a friend. > For whatever reason, any time I rode more than about 20 miles or so, they > would literally cut my ass. Something on the edge of the chamois was sawing > a 1" long laceration into my outer cheek...quite literally a PITA. I liked > the shorts in every other respect, but found them impossible to wear. > > My friend wears them with no problems...just goes to show that every body is > different. That would have been the rear seam, which should be flat felled. I had the same problem with a 1989 pair of PI, but it was only a problem after a very hot double century -- and I never had it again. But you bring up the obvious fact that shorts are very personal fit-wise. My very favorite pair of shorts was a pair of bibs made by a now-defunct small company called BLIX. They were required team-wear and probably too large in the uppers for most of the riders on my team -- but perfect for me. Long legs, thin padding, nice flat seams and a good weight fabric. I wish I bought ten pairs. -- Jay Beattie. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
Bibs preferrable to shorts. Castelli Y2K, Great but too expensive. Nashbar Epic, Pad works as well as Castelli. Inseam and rise are short. A plus for some people. Don't buy if you have a belly. Voler with blue pad. Pad slighly inferior to above. Great value and fit. Long rides = 200 mi. and greater. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
On Mon, 12 May 2003 11:57:12 -0700, Jim Lane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> wrote: >There is no one soliution for everyone. Actually, a trick used by many Ultra riders is to wear 2 pair of shorts. One with thin pad and another regular. The outer short will move over the inner one instead of rubbing your skin. Women seem to do very well with this solution. I don't wear 2 pair regularly. When I did, I found that an old, worn thin, 2nd pair of shorts worked fine. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
"Paul Kopit" <p.kopit@verizon.net> wrote in message news:2j52cv84b80n0tkghfs33bl7ikcdej8uup@4ax.com... > On Mon, 12 May 2003 11:57:12 -0700, Jim Lane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >There is no one soliution for everyone. > > Actually, a trick used by many Ultra riders is to wear 2 pair of shorts. One with thin pad and > another regular. The outer short will move over the inner one instead of rubbing your skin. Women > seem to do very well with this solution. I don't wear 2 pair regularly. When I did, I found that > an old, worn thin, 2nd pair of shorts worked fine. > Which one is against your skin? The older thinner one, or the thicker one? GG |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















