| rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| | |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Is there a big difference in Q-factor between Centaur and Record triple cranks? I've measured the difference between a Centaur triple (with 111mm BB) and Record double (with 102mm BB). The difference turned out to be 2.3cm difference (16.9 - 14.6) which is really noticable while riding. Anybody knows how a Record triple crankset with Record or Chorus 111mm BB relates to one or both of these? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
IDK, but modern triples are splayed too wide so they clear everything. I have older suginos that are better also TA makes narrower triples |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
<< Anybody knows how a Record triple crankset with Record or Chorus 111mm BB relates to one or both of these? All Campagnolo triple cranks are the same q factor if using the 111mm , proper BB, 65.5mm center of BB shell to inside of crank arm, symmetyrical, From 2002/3 tech specs. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















