| rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section! |
| |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
|
|
#2
| |||
| |||
In article <balfgc$14kpd$1@ID-144931.news.dfncis.de>, Pete Biggs <news2@pbiggs2000.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >... http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=3609961658 > >...Looks like a Veloce to me. Not Chorus - no carrier, full set of amber spacers. Could be Veloce. Seller may have been confused by taking that cassette off an otherwise Chorus bike, it would be a predictable OEM corner to cut. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Pete-<< Looks like a Veloce to me. When 9s came out in 1997, the cogs were all loose, including Chorus, Spidered carriers came out in 1998...Could be Chorus. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
On Fri, 23 May 2003 17:13:55 +0000, Paul Southworth wrote: > In article <balfgc$14kpd$1@ID-144931.news.dfncis.de>, Pete Biggs > <news2@pbiggs2000.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >>... http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...tem=3609961658 >> >>...Looks like a Veloce to me. > > Not Chorus - no carrier, full set of amber spacers. Could be Veloce. Seller may have been confused > by taking that cassette off an otherwise Chorus bike, it would be a predictable OEM corner to cut. In all fairness, if it is really new and it has the sizes you want (13-23). then the 15 pounds he is asking is pretty good, even if it is Veloce. -- David L. Johnson __o | Enron's slogan: Respect, Communication, Integrity, and _`\(,_ | Excellence. (_)/ (_) | |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote: > When 9s came out in 1997, the cogs were all loose, including Chorus, Spidered carriers came out in > 1998...Could be Chorus. Were they better than the current Veloce cassettes in any way? Lighter? I feel sorry for any bidder who ends up paying over the odds. ~PB |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
"Pete Biggs" <pLime{remove_fruit}@biggs.tc> wrote in message news:banvc7$1nlfc$1@ID-144931.news.dfncis.de... > Qui si parla Campagnolo wrote: > > > When 9s came out in 1997, the cogs were all loose, including Chorus, Spidered carriers came out > > in 1998...Could be Chorus. > > Were they better than the current Veloce cassettes in any way? Lighter? > > I feel sorry for any bidder who ends up paying over the odds. Nobody stupid enough to make that mistake will bid, especially on campy stuff. But I'm probably wrong. -- Phil, Squid-in-Training |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
vecchio51@aol.com (Qui si parla Campagnolo) wrote in message news:<20030527093323.07772.00000435@mb-m29.aol.com>... > Pete-<< Were they better than the current Veloce cassettes in any way? Lighter? > > Nope, when Chorus and Daytona went to 'carriers' and spiders, the Chorus became > Veloce-identical... > They did change the shape of the cogs around 2001 for slightly better shifting. I have a 2001 Veloce 9sp cassete on one wheel and a 2000 Daytona on another and the Veloce does shift slightly quieter and more smoothly. It's not a big difference but if it is a '97 Chorus cassette you've be better off with a new Veloce one anyway. Bruce Dickson. To win any race you have to stay on your bike. Chris Boardman |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 AM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















