Go Back   Cycling Forums » Other Stuff » Other Groups » rec.bicycles.tech » rec.bicycles.tech archive
rec.bicycles.tech archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.bicycles.tech usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet.
Please read our USENET FAQ before using this section!













38 rear gear with a 20 front gear - Page 3

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-11.-2004
Carl Fogel
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 38 rear gear with a 20 front gear

Tom Sherman <tsherman@qconline.com> wrote in message news:<c2p2g6$1vugr8$1@ID-81487.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> Carl Fogel wrote:
>
> > ... At the even more extreme ratio of a 20 front x 50
> > rear, your foot actually moves farther than the rear
> > wheel rolls. The ratio is 0.77, meaning that for every
> > foot that you crank the pedal, the rear wheel moves only
> > about 9 inches.
> >
> > You'd probably find it easier and faster to walk next to
> > the bike than to use such an extreme ratio. Its only use
> > will be if your leg problems are so bad that you can't
> > walk up the slope.
> >
> > Even then, balance would present a problem. It's hard
> > enough to balance a smoothly pedalled bike heading
> > uphill at such low gearing. An uneven power stroke would
> > make balancing even more difficult....
>
> Dear Carl,
>
> The obvious solution is to add a third wheel. For example,
> an 11-34 cassette and a SRAM Dual Drive hub on a 406-mm
> wheel combined with a 44-32-22 MTB crank on a trike would
> have a gear range of 9 to 106 gear inches, or 2.2 mph at
> 80 rpm in low gear. This would allow an average rider to
> pull a heavy load up almost any hill found on paved roads.
>
> Tom Sherman - Quad Cities (Illinois Side)

Dear Tom,

For pulling a heavy load in addition to the rider, a
dreadfully low-geared tricycle should work as you suggest,
but I suspect that for the ordinary rider the problem is
that pedalling is not free.

At only 2.2 miles per hour, 80 rpm is an awful lot of leg-
thrashing. While the tricycle would offer balance, it
might still be easier to walk up the hill with a normal
stride, pushing the bike or trike, instead of doing just
as much work, plus all that extra high-speed leg raising
and lowering.

What I'm thinking of here is the difference between
pedalling yourself up a geared track next to a stairway
and just climbing the steps. Past a certain steepness,
gearing is unlikely to offer any mechanical advantage over
normal climbing.

The original poster's bad leg may not really change the
situation--80 rpm at 2.2 mph might be easier or not,
depending on the problem. If half the pedal cycle has
scarcely any power on it, then rapid pedalling might be
just as bad as slow walking.

Unfortunately, there may not be any good leg-powered
solutions for a rider with a bad leg on a steep climb.

Carl Fogel
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM.
vBET 3.2.2 brings automatic translations
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com

Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Bulgarian Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Finnish French German Italian Japanese Korean Norwegian Polish Portuguese Spanish Swedish