| rec.running - archive This forum is a gateway to the rec.running usenet newsgroup. Any posts you make in this forum will be propagated to usenet. |
| |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hi! New here, so please forgive if this question has been covered a thousand and two times! I have an opportunity to buy a Landice 8700 treadmill for $1100. It has been reconditioned with new belt, etc. I've seen it, walked on it, and pretty much like it. It's quiet and does not have alot of bells and whistles which is fine with me - only speed, incline and stop/start/pause buttons. It will do caloric usage also, but no heart monitor, which is superfluous anyway to me. It is five years old and will have a limited warranty (6 months parts, 3 months labor). Just wanted to see if this is a good deal or not? I will not be running, will only be using it for walking two to four miles three times/week. DH may use for running, but only occasionally. We are both normal height and weight so it will not have undue stress or wear due to that. Appreciate any feedback you can give or if this is not good, what is the best treadmill (basic, not with a lot of programming on the 'dashboard')? I know about the low end ones and will not get those - I'm talking about the higher plane of treadmills such as True, Landice, Pacemaster, Life Fitness, etc.). I prefer to get one used rather than new due to their high cost. Figure they're made well enough for commercial use, one should last through my occasional use. Thanks! Thea |
|
|
#2
| |||
| |||
I prefer to get one used rather than new due to their high cost. > Figure they're made well enough for commercial use, one > should last through my occasional use. > > Thanks! Thea > > > Love my TRUE 550 hrc. So treadmills yes, Landice? Look around for a local dealer they may be able to do better with limited warranty also. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
Check out www.treadmilldoctor.com. Shoot him an e-mail. "Thea Barbato" <tbarbato@carolina.rr.com> wrote in message news:i4wrc.30519$zq4.2193334@twister.southeast.rr.com... > Hi! New here, so please forgive if this question has been > covered a thousand and > two times! I have an opportunity to buy a Landice 8700 > treadmill for $1100. It has been reconditioned with new > belt, etc. I've seen it, walked > on it, and pretty much like it. It's quiet and does not > have alot of bells > and whistles which is fine with me - only speed, incline > and stop/start/pause buttons. It will do caloric usage > also, but no heart monitor, which is superfluous anyway to > me. It is five years old and will have a limited warranty > (6 months parts, 3 months labor). Just wanted to see if > this is a good deal or not? I will not be running, will > only be using it for walking two to four miles three > times/week. DH may use for running, but only occasionally. > We are both normal height and weight so it > will not have undue stress or wear due to that. > > Appreciate any feedback you can give or if this is not > good, what is the best treadmill (basic, not with a lot of > programming on the 'dashboard')? I > know about the low end ones and will not get those - I'm > talking about the higher plane of treadmills such as True, > Landice, Pacemaster, Life Fitness, > etc.). I prefer to get one used rather than new due to > their high cost. Figure they're made well enough for > commercial use, one should last through > my occasional use. > > Thanks! Thea |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
This post isn't really about a treadmill. It's about using the word superfluous in a sentence. I find it incohexible, to say the least. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
"JR" <jrich7970@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:l42dnbje6dsHLTPdRVn-gg@comcast.com... > Check out www.treadmilldoctor.com. > > Shoot him an e-mail. > > "Thea Barbato" <tbarbato@carolina.rr.com> wrote in > message news:i4wrc.30519$zq4.2193334@twister.southeast.- > rr.com... > > Hi! New here, so please forgive if this question has > > been covered a thousand > and > > two times! I have an opportunity to buy a Landice 8700 > > treadmill for $1100. It has been reconditioned with > > new belt, etc. I've seen it, > walked > > on it, and pretty much like it. It's quiet and does > > not have alot of > bells > > and whistles which is fine with me - only speed, > > incline and stop/start/pause buttons. It will do > > caloric usage also, but no heart monitor, which is > > superfluous anyway to me. It is five years old and will > > have a limited warranty (6 months parts, 3 months > > labor). Just wanted to > > see if this is a good deal or not? I will not be > > running, will only be > > using it for walking two to four miles three > > times/week. DH may use for > > running, but only occasionally. We are both normal > > height and weight so > it > > will not have undue stress or wear due to that. > > > > Appreciate any feedback you can give or if this is not > > good, what is the > > best treadmill (basic, not with a lot of programming > > on the 'dashboard')? > I > > know about the low end ones and will not get those - > > I'm talking about the > > higher plane of treadmills such as True, Landice, > > Pacemaster, Life > Fitness, > > etc.). I prefer to get one used rather than new due to > > their high cost. > > Figure they're made well enough for commercial use, > > one should last > through > > my occasional use. > > > > Thanks! Thea > > > > > >Thanks! I have checked him out, but haven't sent an > >email. Will do so today. This is a major expenditure to me and I really don't want to spend more than I had indicated for the cost of this one, but I also want a good machine that will last. According to my research, Landice is up there in terms of quality, etc. I will do a bit more research though before making a final decision. Thanks again for the input! T. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
"Miss Anne Thrope" <High_Colonic@webtv.net> wrote in message news:29320-40AED9CA-147@storefull-3151.bay.webtv.net... > This post isn't really about a treadmill. It's about > using the word superfluous in a sentence. I find it > incohexible, to say the least. > Indubitably! |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
You are a teller of terradiddles. High_Colonic@webtv.net (Miss Anne Thrope) wrote in message news:<29320-40AED9CA-147@storefull-3151.bay.webtv.net>... > This post isn't really about a treadmill. It's about using > the word superfluous in a sentence. I find it incohexible, > to say the least. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.
vB Enterprise Translator by NLP-er
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
vB Enterprise Translator by NLP-er
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















