| Recumbent bicycles Recumbent bicycles are an ideal option to the traditional diamond frame bicycles. Are you a regular recumbent rider or a rider looking for an alternative to traditional bikes |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Charles
__________________ "If something is worth doing, it's worth doing poorly." "My other car's a Bianchi!" |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
Quote:
I have had hundreds of people ride our bike and think it is the best thing they have EVER ridden. Not one of them was concerned that it wasn't a 'bent'. In fact, in the article concerning semi recumbents and recumbents it was universally accepted that there is no definition of what constitutes a true recumbent. (you, yourself, called it a 'bogus' distinction) The Day 6 bike has a 17" seat with an incredibly comfortable, adjustable, full size back and your feet are out in front of you instead of down - everyone I know calls that a recumbent. By the way, every comfort bike I have seen looks like a modified upright. There is NO comparison between our bike and a 'comfort' bike. It is also interesting that you feel so strongly about creationism considering that there were at least 6 companies at InterBike last year who had 'evolution' in their name or in their marketing literature. Why is it that the religious left can be blatant about their beliefs in commerce but the religious right can't? By the way, have you ever seen a product in commerce that wasn't designed? I haven't. It is a fact that there are some people who are not open to concepts outside their own frame of reference until they try it first, therefore our slogan: One ride and your eyes will be opened. By the way, I used to be an anti-creationist - be careful what you say. Kelly |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Quote:
If however, your creation entices cagers to park the poluting tonnage and start helping the environment and themselves, then I sincerely hope you do well. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#20
| |||
| |||
Quote:
|
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
As for the vague references to so called "intelligent design" what a bunch of garbage. The evolutionary process is well understood and is a broadly accepted scientific fact. Creationism is nothing more than a ploy on the part of the religious right to have religion inserted into the US school curriculum. To do so is in direct violution of the US constitution that sets out separation of church and state. We are unimpressed with nucklehead understanding of the issue and will not have anything further to say on the matter. Your last statement sounded threatening to me. Is this what your sort do? Do you enjoy threatening those who disagree with you? No, don't bother answering. I'll just put you on my ignore list and be done with it. Oh, by the way, is this bike something you are selling? Your repeated references to "our bike" suggests that it is, a fact that did not come through your original posting.
__________________ "If something is worth doing, it's worth doing poorly." "My other car's a Bianchi!" |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#23
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
![]() Charles
__________________ "If something is worth doing, it's worth doing poorly." "My other car's a Bianchi!" Last edited by Bentriderlon; 02-28.-2006 at 09:48 AM. |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
First, Kelly writes: Quote:
Quote:
The bike in question still doesn't fit my definition of a bent because it uses a saddle instead of a seat. Or, as per the evolving BROL definition, if the seat adjusts primarily up/down, then it is an upright. I have to admit though, that it is crowding the definition otherwise. While I realize that semi-bents don't have a home on the Net and I don't have a big problem with them being here, I really don't like seeing them mis-represented as full bents. Riders of true bents laugh at any suggestion that anything with a saddle represents some sort of superior comfort - a saddle is the devil's invention, only to be endured when the rider's feet aren't far enough in front to allow the use of a real seat. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. (Until I think up a better one. ) |
|
#25
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
Interestingly, the EVOX seat, while a saddle, does not adjust up and down. There is only a 2 inch stub it mounts upon. The seat boom adjusts in a forward/backward direction as would any bent. I think EVOX set up the seating as they did merely to save money in both R&D and production. I would love to change the seat, but I have concluded that to do so would be too big a production in exchange for the gains to be realized. Casting about for something to call the EVOX, I have settled on CLWB, as it seems to be very much like other CLWB bikes I have seen. Cheers Charles
__________________ "If something is worth doing, it's worth doing poorly." "My other car's a Bianchi!" Last edited by Bentriderlon; 03-01.-2006 at 07:40 AM. |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
Where'd people get the notion EZ Sports don't climb well. I had that problem until I moved the seat forward enough to allow me to push back into the backrest while pedaling. Once I got this leverage, climbing was much easier. Also, the more I ride the EZ Sport, the more I realize that it is a real nice piece of equipment. Not a racer mind you, but a nice bike. bk |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| sport |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com








)





Linear Mode

















