| Recumbent bicycles Recumbent bicycles are an ideal option to the traditional diamond frame bicycles. Are you a regular recumbent rider or a rider looking for an alternative to traditional bikes |
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Unfortunately, there aren't many (any) stores that carry ALL recumbents available out there for test driving. True or false: those who have experienced psiatica and/or 'recumbent butt' would do better with a recumbent trike that lays the rider down, distributing their weight throughout their body (instead of placing the majority on their rear end, for favor of a more upright 'visible touring' position)? If the answer to the question above is true, then how is a potential purchaser of a recumbent trike supposed to get an accurate idea of how well 'laid down' a trike is, when most trikes only provide statistical facts of how high off the ground the SEAT is (SOMETIMES the hight of the head), and a picture (which is oftimes ambiguous, at best, for the size range involved is (oftimes unknowingly) inextricably tied into the length of the rider (the trike oftimes designed for a FULL RANGE of rider sizes, and DISPLAYED for only ONE of those lengths!) NEVER have I seen accurate figures for the HEAD HEIGHTH! Do you see my dilemma? At 5' 10.5" I want to lay my head DOWN, preferably on a replaceable mesh seat (not the more aging, costly, diffifult to find/replace, less weight tolerant fiberglass plastic shells), have my weight distributed throughout both my back and bottom, legs more UP (more than my present Thunderbolt, Pursuit, and Horizon two-wheelers, and next time with three wheels). Cat trike Speed looks close. More expensive version of Greenspeeds (small wheels) looks close. I can't tell how I proportionally fit on the 'bottom' part of the mesh seat by a picture, and stats often seem incomplete to make up for the inability to fully 'be there'. Suggestions? |
|
#2
| |||||
| |||||
Quote:
Actually, I've been to shops in Holland that have some huge selections. Only problem is that they're all European models.Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Personally, I find extremely reclined seats somewhat fatiguing on longer rides. I'd say 42- to 45-degrees is just about right for me. It spreads the weight across my back, yet gives me a good position for climbing and touring. It's still not wonderful for heavy traffic, but for most other conditions it's pretty good. BTW, I have about 2-inches BB/seat height differential. NR
__________________ Bent, but never out of shape! |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
Quote:
__________________ Hazahl |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| geometries, recumbent, trike |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:31 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com








Actually, I've been to shops in Holland that have some huge selections. Only problem is that they're all European models.




Linear Mode

















