|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hello, I'm trying to avoid trans fats in my diet, and I'm also fond of KitKat bars. One of the listed ingredients is "refined palm kernel oil". Does anyone know if "refined" could potentially mean "hydrogenated"? Thanks in advance for any information from those who might know. -David |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > I'm trying to avoid trans fats in my diet, and I'm also > fond of KitKat bars. One of the listed ingredients is > "refined palm kernel oil". Does anyone know if "refined" > could potentially mean "hydrogenated"? They probably contain some hydrogenated fats, since it helps prevent melting of the chocolate. But occasional KitKat bars aren't going to do any harm, even if they contain hydrogenated fats. How many do you usually eat? Has your doctor imposed any specific dietary restrictions? -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
> > I'm trying to avoid trans fats in my diet, and I'm also > > fond of KitKat bars. > > One of the listed ingredients is "refined palm kernel > > oil". Does anyone know if "refined" could potentially > > mean "hydrogenated"? > > They probably contain some hydrogenated fats, since it > helps prevent melting of the chocolate. I suspected that might be the case as well, except that cocoa butter is listed higher up in the ingredients listing. So my suspicion is that cocoa butter is used to solidify the chocolate coating, and the "refined" palm kernel oil is used in the layers between the wafers. I'm just wondering whether "refined" means the oil is somehow filtered, skimmed, hydrogenated or processed in some other way. A mental image of a Toxco refinery comes to mind... you'd think they'd choose a better word to describe the way it's processed. :-) > But occasional KitKat bars aren't going to do any harm, > even if they contain hydrogenated fats. How many do you > usually eat? Has your doctor imposed any specific dietary > restrictions? I usually only eat one bar a day, as dessert, but since no amount of trans fats is safe, and since their detrimental affects are cumulative, I make every effort to find alternative snacks without them whenever possible. Since this is a snack I enjoy, I'd rather not strike it off my shopping list unnecessarily. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > I suspected that might be the case as well, except that > cocoa butter is listed higher up in the ingredients > listing. So my suspicion is that cocoa butter is used to > solidify the chocolate coating, and the "refined" palm > kernel oil is used in the layers between the wafers. Cocoa butter contributes texture and taste, but not solidity. Pure cocoa butter is a yellowish vegetable fat with a marvellously delicious scent that melts at less than body temperature. At room temperature it is just barely solid enough not to flow on its own. Chocolates that contain lots of cocoa butter are often so melty that they cannot be easily eaten. > I'm just wondering whether "refined" means the oil is > somehow filtered, skimmed, hydrogenated or processed in > some other way. That would be my guess, although I don't really know. > I usually only eat one bar a day, as dessert, but since no > amount of trans fats is safe, and since their detrimental > affects are cumulative, I make every effort to find > alternative snacks without them whenever possible. Sometimes the devil you know is safer than the devil you don't know; in other words, I'm not convinced that avoiding KitKats is really that important. One a day is trivial. Worry more about what you're eating the rest of the day (much of which may well contain some nasty stuff of its own). > Since this is a snack I enjoy, I'd rather not strike it > off my shopping list unnecessarily. I don't see any reason to strike it off at all. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
> > I suspected that might be the case as well, except that > > cocoa butter is listed higher up in the ingredients > > listing. So my suspicion is that cocoa > > butter is used to solidify the chocolate coating, and > > the "refined" palm kernel oil is used in the layers > > between the wafers. > > Cocoa butter contributes texture and taste, but not > solidity. Pure cocoa butter is a yellowish vegetable fat > with a marvellously delicious scent that melts at less > than body temperature. At room temperature it is just > barely solid enough not to flow on its own. Chocolates > that contain lots of cocoa butter are often so melty that > they cannot be easily eaten. That's not to say that hydrogenation is *required* in order to provide a solid consistency to chocolate, though. Your plain Hershey bar has none of the stuff, for instance. > > I'm just wondering whether "refined" means the oil is > > somehow filtered, skimmed, hydrogenated or processed in > > some other way. > > That would be my guess, although I don't really know. > > > I usually only eat one bar a day, as dessert, but since > > no amount of trans > > fats is safe, and since their detrimental affects are > > cumulative, I make every effort to find alternative > > snacks without them whenever possible. > > Sometimes the devil you know is safer than the devil you > don't know; in other words, I'm not convinced that > avoiding KitKats is really that important. One a day is > trivial. Worry more about what you're eating the rest of > the day (much of which may well contain some nasty stuff > of its own). > > > Since this is a snack I enjoy, I'd rather not strike it > > off my shopping list > > unnecessarily. > > I don't see any reason to strike it off at all. You don't? Thanks for sharing your opinion. Just out of curiosity, what is your area of profession or expertise on the subject? I just want to put it in perspective. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > That's not to say that hydrogenation is *required* in > order to provide a solid consistency to chocolate, though. > Your plain Hershey bar has none of the stuff, for > instance. Cocoa powder itself is solid at room temperature, so if the cocoa butter content is low, you don't need anything to keep it solid. Dark chocolate is like this. Also, not having milk in the chocolate keeps it more solid, I believe. There are various ways of keeping it from melting in your hand, not in your mouth. > You don't? Thanks for sharing your opinion. Just out of > curiosity, what is your area of profession or expertise on > the subject? I just want to put it in perspective. I don't have a special area of expertise. If you want expert, "official" advice, see a doctor. USENET isn't the place to look for it. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
> > > > Since this is a snack I enjoy, I'd rather not strike > > > > it off my shopping list > > > > unnecessarily. > > > > > > I don't see any reason to strike it off at all. > > > > You don't? Thanks for sharing your opinion. Just out of > > curiosity, what is > > your area of profession or expertise on the subject? I > > just want to put it > > in perspective. > > I don't have a special area of expertise. If you want > expert, "official" advice, see a doctor. USENET isn't the > place to look for it. The reason I asked is because I wasn't looking to be swayed either way on the use of foodstuffs containing hydrogenated oils - I was simply asking for a definition of "refined palm kernel oil", in the context of hydrogenation, from those who might know. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > The reason I asked is because I wasn't looking to be > swayed either way on the use of foodstuffs containing > hydrogenated oils - I was simply asking for a definition > of "refined palm kernel oil", in the context of > hydrogenation, from those who might know. A bit of searching around on the Web reveals that "refined" and "hydrogenated" are not synonymous, so the fact that the oil is refined doesn't necessarily mean that it is hydrogenated, unless this is also explicitly stated. But overall, I don't see it as much of a concern. Unless you have very strict dietary restrictions imposed by your doctor, a KitKat a day isn't going to make any difference to your health. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
> > The reason I asked is because I wasn't looking to be > > swayed either way on > > the use of foodstuffs containing hydrogenated oils - I > > was simply asking for > > a definition of "refined palm kernel oil", in the > > context of hydrogenation, > > from those who might know. > > A bit of searching around on the Web reveals that > "refined" and "hydrogenated" are not synonymous, so the > fact that the oil is refined doesn't necessarily mean that > it is hydrogenated, unless this is also explicitly stated. While I agree that the labeling doesn't necessarily mean the product uses hydrogenated oil, it still seems ambiguous. I guess a better question would be whether it's legal for hydrogenated oil to be labeled as "refined". Sometimes clever wording is used, like as "vegetable fat" and "margarine", to throw-off consumers looking for this information. > But overall, I don't see it as much of a concern. Unless > you have very strict dietary restrictions imposed by your > doctor, a KitKat a day isn't going to make any difference > to your health. From what I've read, as little as 2 grams daily intake of trans fats is detrimental to human health. Another report states that no amount of intake of trans fats is safe. The nutrition facts label on the KitKat bar states 11 grams total fat, of which 7 grams is saturated (1 bar = 1 serving, and no mention of poly or mono). Therefore, if labeling guidelines allow for trans fats to be labeled as "refined", this means that up to 4 grams of trans fats are contained in each bar. In neither case could this amount of daily intake of trans fat be considered benign. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
> > The reason I asked is because I wasn't looking to be > > swayed either way on > > the use of foodstuffs containing hydrogenated oils - I > > was simply asking for > > a definition of "refined palm kernel oil", in the > > context of hydrogenation, > > from those who might know. > > A bit of searching around on the Web reveals that > "refined" and "hydrogenated" are not synonymous, so the > fact that the oil is refined doesn't necessarily mean that > it is hydrogenated, unless this is also explicitly stated. While I agree that the labeling doesn't necessarily mean the product uses hydrogenated oil, it still seems ambiguous. I guess a better question would be whether it's legal for hydrogenated oil to be labeled as "refined". Sometimes clever wording is used, like as "vegetable fat" and "margarine", to throw-off consumers looking for this information. > But overall, I don't see it as much of a concern. Unless > you have very strict dietary restrictions imposed by your > doctor, a KitKat a day isn't going to make any difference > to your health. From what I've read, as little as 2 grams daily intake of trans fats is detrimental to human health. Another report states that no amount of intake of trans fats is safe. The nutrition facts label on the KitKat bar states 11 grams total fat, of which 7 grams is saturated (1 bar = 1 serving, and no mention of poly or mono). Therefore, if labeling guidelines allow for trans fats to be labeled as "refined", this means that up to 4 grams of trans fats are contained in each bar. In neither case could this amount of daily intake of trans fat be considered benign. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > From what I've read, as little as 2 grams daily intake of > trans fats is detrimental to human health. Another report > states that no amount of intake of trans fats is safe. Well, wait five years, and researchers will probably be recommending trans-fat supplements. > The nutrition facts label on the KitKat bar states 11 > grams total fat, of which 7 grams is saturated (1 bar = 1 > serving, and no mention of poly or mono). Therefore, if > labeling guidelines allow for trans fats to be labeled as > "refined", this means that up to 4 grams of trans fats are > contained in each bar. In neither case could this amount > of daily intake of trans fat be considered benign. It depends on what else you are eating, and more generally, on your entire lifestyle. Do you smoke? Do you drink alcohol? Are you overweight? And so on. In my case, I worry mainly about total calories, but I don't care where they come from. That's because my health is threatened much more by excess weight than by anything contained in my diet. And if I smoked, the main risk would be from smoking. Etc. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > From what I've read, as little as 2 grams daily intake of > trans fats is detrimental to human health. Another report > states that no amount of intake of trans fats is safe. Well, wait five years, and researchers will probably be recommending trans-fat supplements. > The nutrition facts label on the KitKat bar states 11 > grams total fat, of which 7 grams is saturated (1 bar = 1 > serving, and no mention of poly or mono). Therefore, if > labeling guidelines allow for trans fats to be labeled as > "refined", this means that up to 4 grams of trans fats are > contained in each bar. In neither case could this amount > of daily intake of trans fat be considered benign. It depends on what else you are eating, and more generally, on your entire lifestyle. Do you smoke? Do you drink alcohol? Are you overweight? And so on. In my case, I worry mainly about total calories, but I don't care where they come from. That's because my health is threatened much more by excess weight than by anything contained in my diet. And if I smoked, the main risk would be from smoking. Etc. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
"David Johnson" <djohnson@nospam.com> wrote in message news:umd3c.3301$Cm3.2714@newsread3.n....earthlink.net... > Hello, > > I'm trying to avoid trans fats in my diet, and I'm also > fond of KitKat bars. > One of the listed ingredients is "refined palm kernel > oil". Does anyone know if "refined" could potentially mean > "hydrogenated"? > > Thanks in advance for any information from those who > might know. > > -David Refined does not mean hydrogenated. There is a food-grade hydrogenated palm kernel oil, but it has one more processing step than does refined palm kernel oil. The refining process removes co-extractives, and bleaches and deodorizes the oil. Refining can also mean that the oil is partially fractionated. Palm kernel oil is mostly medium-chain saturated fatty acids, with relatively small amounts of 18- carbon mono- and di-unsaturates. Lar |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
> Refined does not mean hydrogenated. There is a food-grade > hydrogenated palm > kernel oil, but it has one more processing step than does > refined palm kernel oil. The refining process removes co- > extractives, and bleaches and deodorizes the oil. Refining > can also mean that the oil is partially fractionated. Palm > kernel oil is mostly medium-chain saturated fatty acids, > with relatively small amounts of 18-carbon mono- and di- > unsaturates. > > Lar Thanks very much for the post. This is just the kind of info I was looking for. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
David Johnson writes: > I know you are being facetious, but the ill effects of > trans fats are pretty well established now. Well, it used to be all fat. Then it was no fat. Then it was only certain fats. Then it was only certain _other_ fats. And so on. The fact is, controlled studies are extremely difficult to conduct in human beings, and often research depends a great deal on circumstantial evidence, and confuses correlation with causation. > Again, _no_amount_of_trans_fat_intake_is_safe_. That is an exaggeration. Even cyanide is safe if the amount of it ingested it small enough (really small). > Here's a hypothetical question - if the candy bar you > enjoyed eating had arsenic, instead of trans fat, and the > level was low enough not to cause any overt symptoms by > eating a bar a day, and you later discovered it contained > arsenic, would you still eat one every day? Of course not. I don't know. Apples contain cyanide, but I still eat apples. And of course a lot of people smoke, even though just about everything in cigarette smoke is toxic (nicotine, in particular, is one of the most toxic substances known). -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com
Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2001 - 2009 cyclingforums.com









Linear Mode

















