![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> writes: > > > >> You seem determined to miss the central concern in your insistence on > >> adherence to the standards. Obviously your mind is made up and not > >> amenable to change. > > > > Yep - you guys are whining about trivia. Anyone looking at the text > > can tell who said what, so as far as I'm concerned, you have nothing > > to complain about, particularly since I didn't comment on either guy's > > statement, but simply added something to the discussion. > > You sure added to the discussion all right! It was certainly more amusing than your comment about Hell! And it is obviously you three who have a real problem. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> writes: > > > >> You seem determined to miss the central concern in your insistence on > >> adherence to the standards. Obviously your mind is made up and not > >> amenable to change. > > Wouldn't it be stupid of me to use Bill Z.'s snipped post to reply to Tim > here? > > Bill "but I'll never admit it" S. > No, it wouldn't be stupid. Suppose, you intended to reply to mine, but after writing it, you found that you had really just addressed Tim's point. What would be stupid would be to cancel the whole post and start over, even if you saved your comments first so you wouldn't have to type them twice. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > > The fact is you really don't know what you are talking about. > > I know you posted "Sorni writes:" followed by exactly NOTHING I wrote. > > My only mistake was pointing it out to you. > > Bill "you're right and we're all wrong" S. The three or four of you are IMHO all being rediculous. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Z. wrote:
> JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> writes: > > >>Bill Z. wrote: >> >> >>>JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> writes: >>> >>> >>>>If there is nothing of Sorni left because of your editing, you should >>>>have gone back up the thread a step. You might want to step back and >>>>take a look instead of being defensive. Bill is right. >>> >>>Do you honestly think anyone is going to check that when the content >>>of the post is a mere quip? I think you guys are being just a tad >>>silly. >>> >> >>And you are not? >> >>Step back and look at your idiocy with a neutral eye. Everyone else >>here sees it clearly. Get over yourself, bimbo. > > > "Everyone else" are a few idiots with their heads up their butts. > At least they have a head with a brain to place up their butts. That is far more than you have. Although your butt would accommodate us all. jim jim |
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Z. wrote:
> JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> writes: > > >>Bill Z. wrote: >> >> >>>"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: >>> >>> >>>>Actually, then, it's better to reply to the post upon which you're >>>>commenting. Your reply was directed at Dick Durbin, not me, so why did you >>>>reply to MY post instead of his? >>> >>>Because your post was the one I saw and started to reply to, and the >>>comment I added was about the general topic under discussion. >>> >> >>Then preface your comment, clown. Say with, "this isn't in direct >>reply, but I am jumping in here," or something to that effect. >> >>You are still in the wrong, despite your delusions of grandeur. > > > Jim, you are a moron. There was *no* discussion of any kind going on. > Just some wisecracks. > A moron is a long way up the feeding chain from where you reside, mentalmidget. jim |
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
S o r n i wrote:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > >>The fact is you really don't know what you are talking about. > > > I know you posted "Sorni writes:" followed by exactly NOTHING I wrote. > > My only mistake was pointing it out to you. > > Bill "you're right and we're all wrong" S. > > Okay folks, just so billieboy the mentalmidget can get it. Please place your vote (hopefully Billy will be able to add the results up hisself): ____ Sorni is right ____ Billy is right jim |
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
JimLane wrote:
> S o r n i wrote: > >> Bill Z. wrote: >> >> >>> The fact is you really don't know what you are talking about. >> >> >> I know you posted "Sorni writes:" followed by exactly NOTHING I >> wrote. >> >> My only mistake was pointing it out to you. >> >> Bill "you're right and we're all wrong" S. >> >> > > Okay folks, just so billieboy the mentalmidget can get it. Please > place your vote (hopefully Billy will be able to add the results up > hisself): > > ____ Sorni is right > > ____ Billy is right Let's let it go. Bill "besides, everyone knows *I'm* right ;-) " S. |
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Z. wrote:
> "S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: > >> Bill Z. wrote: >>> Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> writes: >>> >>>> You seem determined to miss the central concern in your insistence >>>> on adherence to the standards. Obviously your mind is made up and >>>> not amenable to change. >> >> Wouldn't it be stupid of me to use Bill Z.'s snipped post to reply >> to Tim here? >> >> Bill "but I'll never admit it" S. >> > > No, it wouldn't be stupid. Suppose, you intended to reply to mine, > but after writing it, you found that you had really just addressed > Tim's point. What would be stupid would be to cancel the whole post > and start over, even if you saved your comments first so you wouldn't > have to type them twice. Ah, so you admit you made a ( /very small/ ) error in posting! Finally, we're getting somewhere... Bill "cue the friggin' angels' voices" S. |
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Z. wrote:
> "S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: > >> Bill Z. wrote: >>> Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> writes: >>> >>>> You seem determined to miss the central concern in your insistence >>>> on adherence to the standards. Obviously your mind is made up and >>>> not amenable to change. >>> >>> Yep - you guys are whining about trivia. Anyone looking at the text >>> can tell who said what, so as far as I'm concerned, you have nothing >>> to complain about, particularly since I didn't comment on either >>> guy's statement, but simply added something to the discussion. >> >> You sure added to the discussion all right! > > It was certainly more amusing than your comment about Hell! And it is > obviously you three who have a real problem. Right, Bill, right. We three have a problem and you're perfect. All fine now? Bill "amazing how three total strangers are on same page and you're out in left field, but OK" S. |
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > "S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: > Right, Bill, right. We three have a problem and you're perfect. > All fine now? That you three are have a problem means I'm perfect??? -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes:
> Bill Z. wrote: > > No, it wouldn't be stupid. Suppose, you intended to reply to mine, > > but after writing it, you found that you had really just addressed > > Tim's point. What would be stupid would be to cancel the whole post > > and start over, even if you saved your comments first so you wouldn't > > have to type them twice. > > Ah, so you admit you made a ( /very small/ ) error in posting! Finally, > we're getting somewhere... I don't consider it an error because the attribution was 100% clear - clear enough for my newsreader to figure it out, and that uses a very simple algorithm. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> writes:
> A moron is a long way up the feeding chain from where you reside, > mentalmidget. Oooh. you really do have a problem, don't you. -- My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB |
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
When I started on Usenet Earthlink had 300 customers and was running from upstairs of a coffeehouse on Melrose ave. AoLers couldn't get to the "real" internet and all the dot eeedoo guys were complaining that the new breed of uninformed newbies from Netcom were going to be the death of the internet. I've read more than my share of Usenet in that 9 years and Zaumen, I have to say that I also think you're wrong here. Hellen/Kurt |
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
helen@mediaone.net wrote:
> When I started on Usenet Earthlink had 300 customers and was running > from upstairs of a coffeehouse on Melrose ave. AoLers couldn't get to > the "real" internet and all the dot eeedoo guys were complaining that > the new breed of uninformed newbies from Netcom were going to be the > death of the internet. I've read more than my share of Usenet in that > 9 years and Zaumen, I have to say that I also think you're wrong here. Psst. She's talking to you, Bill Z. Bill "Zee other Bill" S. |
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bill Z. wrote:
> JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> writes: > > >>A moron is a long way up the feeding chain from where you reside, >>mentalmidget. > > > Oooh. you really do have a problem, don't you. > Nah, it's minor compared to your inflated ego and insensitivity to your own wrongheadedness. jim |
|