Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
06-04.-2004, 05:34 PM
|
#76 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
S o r n i wrote:
> JimLane wrote: > >>S o r n i wrote: >> >> >>>Bill Z. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>The fact is you really don't know what you are talking about. >>> >>> >>>I know you posted "Sorni writes:" followed by exactly NOTHING I >>>wrote. >>> >>>My only mistake was pointing it out to you. >>> >>>Bill "you're right and we're all wrong" S. >>> >>> >> >>Okay folks, just so billieboy the mentalmidget can get it. Please >>place your vote (hopefully Billy will be able to add the results up >>hisself): >> >>____ Sorni is right >> >>____ Billy is right > > > > Let's let it go. > > Bill "besides, everyone knows *I'm* right ;-) " S. > > Done, he is the fencepost, after all, although I was thinking: ____ Sorni is right ____ Z is wrong jim |
|
|
07-04.-2004, 01:23 AM
|
#77 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
i've been reading usenet since i got it via UUCP feeds to a sun 3/50 .. wait,
before that, since csd4 running digital ultrix or some such monstrosity. X windows didn't even exist then. that would have been around 1985. i've certainly read my share and i have to say .. i don't give a shit who's right here. you guys sure can go on about nothing. i am, however, very glad i admitted my mistake .. here .. up front. http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...bd85cd4b&rnum=5 -- david reuteler reuteler@visi.com |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 04:02 AM
|
#78 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
06 Apr 2004 16:23:52 GMT,
<4072d998$0$17253$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com>, David Reuteler <reuteler@visi.com> wrote: >i am, however, very glad i admitted my mistake .. That's part of a philosophical problem among higher mammals having normal cingulate and prefrontal cortex responses. -- zk |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 04:05 AM
|
#79 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
Zoot Katz wrote:
> 06 Apr 2004 16:23:52 GMT, > <4072d998$0$17253$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com>, > David Reuteler <reuteler@visi.com> wrote: > >> i am, however, very glad i admitted my mistake .. > > That's part of a philosophical problem among higher mammals having > normal cingulate and prefrontal cortex responses. Damiit, ZK, you stole my line! Bill "but I don't even have a cellphone*" S. *Poor attempt at Cingulate humor |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 04:10 AM
|
#80 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
Tue, 06 Apr 2004 19:05:33 GMT,
<1cDcc.2094$nd1.311@twister.socal.rr.com>, "S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> wrote: >Damiit, ZK, you stole my line! 'twen't nailed good nuf - Henry Ford -- zk |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 05:10 AM
|
#81 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) writes:
> And it is obviously you three who have a real problem. I'll hand it to you, Bill. In the years I've been on Usenet, you are one of the best at avoiding getting a clue. A masterful performance that is now smelling like overripe troll. |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 05:12 AM
|
#82 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
David Reuteler <reuteler@visi.com> writes:
> you guys sure can go on about nothing. Welcome to Usenet 2.0, the service that's about nothing. Content free since Al invented the Internet. |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 05:14 AM
|
#83 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) writes:
> The three or four of you are IMHO all being rediculous. <G> |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 07:22 AM
|
#84 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
I've read the entire thread thus far, and I think both of your mothers
wear combat boots. |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 09:31 AM
|
#85 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:00:30 GMT, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill
Z.) wrote: >"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: >> Bill "you're right and we're all wrong" S. > >The three or four of you are IMHO all being rediculous. s/"three or four"/"four or five"/ I'd like to add myself to your "rediculous" list, please. Sure glad I'm not ridiculous, though. -- Rick Onanian |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 09:31 AM
|
#86 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:34:06 -0700, JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com>
wrote: >> JimLane wrote: >>>Okay folks, just so billieboy the mentalmidget can get it. Please >>>place your vote (hopefully Billy will be able to add the results up >>>hisself): >>> >>>__X__ Sorni is right >>> >>>____ Billy is right > >Done, he is the fencepost, after all, although I was thinking: > >__X__ Sorni is right > >__X__ Z is wrong Not only did I fill in the blanks, but I even went to the trouble of deleting attributions that no longer had content in the message... -- Rick "What, me fan the flames?" Onanian |
|
|
|
07-04.-2004, 11:02 AM
|
#87 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
Rick Onanian wrote:
>> __X__ Sorni is right >> >> __X__ Z is wrong > > Not only did I fill in the blanks, but I even went to the trouble of > deleting attributions that no longer had content in the message... Whaddya, NEW?!? Bill "we'll have no more of that, young man" S. |
|
|
|
08-04.-2004, 04:08 AM
|
#88 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys
S o r n i wrote:
> Bill Z. wrote: > >>"S o r n i" <sorni@bite-me.san.rr.com> writes: >> >> >> >>>Anyone else would have just said, "Whoops, you're right -- I forgot >>>to snip your name so it looked like you said something you didn't", >>>or "Ooops, I replied to the wrong post" and that would have been the >>>end of it (seen it many, many times). >> >><idiotic comments snipped>. >> >>Sorni, if you are such a complete and utter idiot as to think that >>anyone couldn't tell who said what, you are hopeless. I quoted you as >>quoting someone else, with that someone else mentioned by name. It >>basically said, "Sorni said that Dave said that ...." If I had >>eliminated the "Dave said," you'd have a legitimate complaint, but I >>didn't do that. If you are such an idiot that you can't tell the >>difference, that's your loss. > > > So "Sorni writes:" is the same as saying "Sorni says that so & so said:"? > Sorry, it's not. > > You replied to the wrong post and didn't catch it and/or clean it up before > hitting "Send", and you just won't admit it. > > God help you if there's ever an /important/ issue in your life where you > need to admit and error or -- horrors! -- apologize. > > Bill "learned long ago I'd rather be happy than *right* (at all costs)" S. > > PS: Resorting to name-calling doesn't make you seem any more rational, > Bill. (And you called ME petulant!) > > Nah, I called Z petulant, didn't I? If he did, he was cribbin off me. jim |
|
|
|
08-04.-2004, 07:12 AM
|
#89 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:38:21 -0700, JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com>
wrote: >Zippy the Pinhead wrote: >> I've read the entire thread thus far, and I think both of your mothers >> wear combat boots. > >At least we had mothers. Yes, I made the acquaintance of yours here: http://www.hoslap.net/ |
|
|
|
08-04.-2004, 07:47 AM
|
#90 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Buddhist Bicycle Jerseys - poll
Zippy the Pinhead wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:38:21 -0700, JimLane <ensenadajim@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >>Zippy the Pinhead wrote: >> >>>I've read the entire thread thus far, and I think both of your mothers >>>wear combat boots. >> >>At least we had mothers. > > > Yes, I made the acquaintance of yours here: http://www.hoslap.net/ > > Hmmm, so that's who you are trying to associate with, eh? You probably were too low on the totem to get anywhere. After all, they do have standards and you can't even make that cut. jim jim |
|
|
Linear Mode
