![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"gwhite" <gwhite@ti.com> wrote in message news:698b8866.0404231151.1970b705@posting.google.com... > "B. Lafferty" <Magni@Italia.com> wrote: > > > Fon't forget what Elle said about gay men and shoes in Legally Blond. > > That only raises more questions. For example: what man other than a > gay man has seen Legally Blond? You got a wife and kids? |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bob Schwartz wrote: > Chris <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Yeah, probably. I just do not think it is cool at all to perpetuate the >>rumor in any way. George is one of the nicest guys to race with a US Pro >>license and deserves to be treated with a lot more respect. Then again, this >>is RBR... > > > The rumor was never about George's sexuality. It was always about yanking > chains, which is the very core of rbr's existence. > > Having said that, check out the shoes. > > http://www.pbase.com/image/5598590 > > Can there be any doubt? Bruno Magli shoes don't mean anything. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Stewart Fleming" <stewart.fleming@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message
news:AXeic.3409$cY5.259903@news02.tsnz.net... > > Bob Schwartz wrote: > > Chris <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Yeah, probably. I just do not think it is cool at all to perpetuate the > >>rumor in any way. George is one of the nicest guys to race with a US Pro > >>license and deserves to be treated with a lot more respect. Then again, this > >>is RBR... > > > > > > The rumor was never about George's sexuality. It was always about yanking > > chains, which is the very core of rbr's existence. > > > > Having said that, check out the shoes. > > > > http://www.pbase.com/image/5598590 > > > > Can there be any doubt? > > Bruno Magli shoes don't mean anything. They do to the stock holders. |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chris <chrismcreynolds@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Foolish to take that rumor seriously and equally foolish to think that a > pregnancy gives any indication of anyone's sexual preferences. Working by a hospital, I interact quite a bit with genetic counselors. Informally, they seem to agree that about 15% of pregnancies couldn't possibly come from the mother's husband's sperm. Just FYI. Didier -- Didier A Depireux ddepi001@umaryland.edu didier@isr.umd.edu 20 Penn Str - S218E http://neurobiology.umaryland.edu/depireux.htm Anatomy and Neurobiology Phone: 410-706-1272 (lab) University of Maryland -1273 (off) Baltimore MD 21201 USA Fax: 1-410-706-2512 |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Didier A. Depireux" <didier@y.glue.umd.edu> wrote in message news:c6ci4r$7v6$1@grapevine.wam.umd.edu... > Informally, they seem to agree that about 15% of pregnancies couldn't > possibly come from the mother's husband's sperm. Just FYI. I'd put it slightly higher than 15% judging by the number of bastards I've met in my lifetime! |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > > > Bruno Magli shoes don't mean anything. > > They do to the stock holders. > They do to OJ. |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Kunich wrote: > "Stewart Fleming" <stewart.fleming@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message > news:AXeic.3409$cY5.259903@news02.tsnz.net... >>Bruno Magli shoes don't mean anything. > They do to the stock holders. heather, did your 12-year-old get the OJ reference? |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Stewart Fleming wrote: > > Tom Kunich wrote: > > "Stewart Fleming" <stewart.fleming@paradise.net.nz> wrote in message > > news:AXeic.3409$cY5.259903@news02.tsnz.net... > >>Bruno Magli shoes don't mean anything. > > They do to the stock holders. > > heather, did your 12-year-old get the OJ reference? i didn't ask him (playing baseball & not around) but i can only hope he wouldn't get it. there are some things you don't want your 12 year old to be an expert on. it was a little funny when his father took him to an acting class full of adults and in one exercise he had to pretend to be public figure while others tried to guess who he was, so he decided to pretend to be john ashcroft. i guess if he knows about john i shouldn't be trying to shield him from what a terrible place the world is, but i am a parent after all. heather |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Marlene Blanshay wrote:
> "Tim Mullin" <tvphotog@earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:Xns94D46A392AC19tvphotogearthlinknet@207.69.154.205... > >>Bob Schwartz <cvcc@shell.core.com> wrote in >>news:108i93bk0an78ee@corp.supernews.com: >> >> >>>Having said that, check out the shoes. >>> >>>http://www.pbase.com/image/5598590 >>> >>>Can there be any doubt? >> >>That does clear things up. No self-respecting gay man would ever wear > > those > >>shoes! George must be straight. > > > Hahaha.... they strike me as sort of 'unisex' sandals, probably popular in > Europe. > > and if not the sandals then surely the *red* nikes, Right? |
|