![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,631
|
Quote:
An interesting theory ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mt. Diablo, California
Posts: 2,249
|
I'm going on the record here as saying that Sheryl Crowe is a very desirable woman, if not a beauty in the classical sense. And I don't really even care for her music but she has a character and sense of self and an athletic body that I find magnetic. Not on my short list of babes (Claudia Schiffer is obviously up there), but far better than she gets credit for here.
Flame away. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,672
|
Quote:
Take a look at a video of the Rolling Stones live performance at Madison Square Gardens in December, 2002. She did a duet with Mick Jagger, and she looked great decked out in red, white and blue leathers. ![]() |
|
|
|
|