Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 26-07.-2004, 08:55 AM   #16
Weisse Luft
Registered User
 
Weisse Luft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

The reason for Lance's dominance is not due to drugs. Its quite simple and no secret.

He knows his body.

He knows the courses.

He knows his team.

Mix these three with a great Director Sportiff and you have a winning combination. No drugs, no secrets.
Weisse Luft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 09:35 AM   #17
mojomarc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 72
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
Mix these three with a great Director Sportiff and you have a winning combination. No drugs, no secrets.

Or, at least, no more drugs than anyone else. After all, it is perfectly possible that the entire peloton is chock full of drugs. But of course the entire peloton being chock full of drugs is no reason to just focus on the drugs that supposedly LA is taking. That seemed to be the point of Hampstead's letter.
mojomarc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 10:07 AM   #18
Weisse Luft
Registered User
 
Weisse Luft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

"Chock full of drugs"? Pure fabrication. There is NO WAY for ANY drug use save EPO/blood doping to escape detection. No way.

While the semi-technical here know the sensivity of HPLC and GC-MS in detection of urine metabolites, there are other, more sensitive techniques which include ELISA based tests. But just like the aforementioned methods, a test can only look for known dopants. But I am waiting on the detractors here to identify what unknown and undectable dopants are in use. Please inform instead of speculating.
Weisse Luft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 10:10 AM   #19
gntlmn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Anchorage, Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,672
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mocka58
I think you have pretty much hit the nail on the head. I believe Bjarne Riis's nickname after his Tour de France win was 'Mr Sixty percent"!
I do think your criticism of Armstrong's before/after cancer record is a bit rough however. I think he could have developed into a good tour rider with the right training and preparation. He won some pretty big bike races before his illness. He had only just turned 25 when it was diagnozed. Take the Tour de France out of his post cancer record and I think the two phases of his career start to look a little more even. The former actually looks a little better that the latter.


He was the number 1 ranked cyclist in the world in 1996, and then later that year, he was diagnosed with cancer and almost died. Going from #1 ranked cyclist to TdF champion does not seem to be a stretch to me considering that Tour champions typically mature in their late 20's, not early 20's. Lance was 24 when he came down with cancer. The fact that Limerickman continues to omit these facts and continues to point to a huge disparity that does not exist is very biased. The win/loss record is explainable by factors posted elsewhere in this forum.
gntlmn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 11:04 AM   #20
mojomarc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 72
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
"Chock full of drugs"? Pure fabrication. There is NO WAY for ANY drug use save EPO/blood doping to escape detection. No way.

While the semi-technical here know the sensivity of HPLC and GC-MS in detection of urine metabolites, there are other, more sensitive techniques which include ELISA based tests. But just like the aforementioned methods, a test can only look for known dopants. But I am waiting on the detractors here to identify what unknown and undectable dopants are in use. Please inform instead of speculating.

While I tend to agree with you, I also am unwilling to dismiss outright that unknown and undectable substances are in use. That was my point, not to accuse anyone of anything. After all, the gulf between someone trying a substance and that substance being used widely enough that it becomes a known doping agent can be pretty long.
mojomarc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 12:38 PM   #21
Weisse Luft
Registered User
 
Weisse Luft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

In spirit, taking some XYZ substance which isn't on the banned list might seem illegal. But as long as the list only states specific agents, their classes and actions, its legal. Ginseng, ginger and guarana extract are legal, to a limit.

The accusation of Lance using EPO is pure fantasy. EPO does only one thing and that is to increase hematocrit and evidence of its use is patently clear when the testing protocols are followed unless the cyclist has been living at Mt. Everest base camp for a month.

The Europeans who spew this rumor need to have the Allied victory over Nazi Germany reversed, just for their world.
Weisse Luft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 12:48 PM   #22
MGM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
"Chock full of drugs"? Pure fabrication. There is NO WAY for ANY drug use save EPO/blood doping to escape detection. No way.

While the semi-technical here know the sensivity of HPLC and GC-MS in detection of urine metabolites, there are other, more sensitive techniques which include ELISA based tests. But just like the aforementioned methods, a test can only look for known dopants. But I am waiting on the detractors here to identify what unknown and undectable dopants are in use. Please inform instead of speculating.

Who's to say lance (or any other rider) isn't using some sort of new doping substance, that is not tested for???
MGM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 12:52 PM   #23
MGM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MGM
Who's to say lance (or any other rider) isn't using some sort of new doping substance, that is not tested for???

Just also wanted to mention, in the past 5 tours, the idea of lance doping has never crossed my mind. However, this year, I have really thought about it hard, and I think there are some compelling signs (to me) for and against his doping.

For 1, a thing that really stuck out to me is that lance ALWAYS had much more energy than any of his rivals at the end of the mountain stages. It was pretty shocking how he had the energy to be able to pull back Kloden.

However, I think to myself, and there is so much contradicting that. Lance has an amazing team, so he saves energy there, and also, his training prepares him very well for that situation.

So what gives?
MGM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 02:31 PM   #24
antoineg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 246
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
"Chock full of drugs"? Pure fabrication. There is NO WAY for ANY drug use save EPO/blood doping to escape detection. No way.


You are full of BS. David Millar admits to doping with EPO, yet (to my knowledge) has never tested positive. If you are so sure that there is NO WAY (to use your big capital letters) for EPO users to escape detection, then how does that happen?

Raimondas Rumsas' wife Edita was detained in 2002.

Quote:
A police spokesman in Lyon said “an enormous amount of products” were seized from her car, including the injectable form of the performance enhancing substance EPO. Use of EPO is banned in sports.


Rumsas did not test positive until 2003. Can you believe that Rumsas was NOT taking EPO in 2002? If so, how did he evade the tests for a whole year (or more)?
antoineg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 02:33 PM   #25
antoineg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 246
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

LOL -- In my haste I didn't read your message for the double negative. You are apparently saying that EPO users CAN evade doping tests.

So we are on the same page here.
antoineg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 03:08 PM   #26
MGM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by antoineg
LOL -- In my haste I didn't read your message for the double negative. You are apparently saying that EPO users CAN evade doping tests.

So we are on the same page here.

no he didnt say that
MGM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 04:46 PM   #27
antoineg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 246
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MGM
no he didnt say that

I believe he did: (emphasis added by me)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
There is NO WAY for ANY drug use save EPO/blood doping to escape detection.


So he's saying he believes that EPO and blood doping users can escape detection.
antoineg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 05:36 PM   #28
Weisse Luft
Registered User
 
Weisse Luft's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by antoineg
I believe he did: (emphasis added by me)



So he's saying he believes that EPO and blood doping users can escape detection.


To a LIMITED extent. The effects of EPO are IDENTICAL to high altitude training or simulants like hypobaric chambers, both total or partial pressure modifications. One can achieve a dangerous hematocrit from these permitted methods which is one reason it is tested.
Weisse Luft is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-07.-2004, 06:03 PM   #29
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,575
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weisse Luft
In spirit, taking some XYZ substance which isn't on the banned list might seem illegal. But as long as the list only states specific agents, their classes and actions, its legal. Ginseng, ginger and guarana extract are legal, to a limit.

.


Performance enhancing drug THG, was not on any proscribed IOC, USADA,
WADA list - yet the use of the drug is being used to prosecute those cheats who used it.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-07.-2004, 03:21 AM   #30
wheresullrich?
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 53
Default Re: why is just armstrong accused of doping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wannabepro
Anybody who thinks Lance and the rest of the Tour peloton is "clean" (as oppossed to "clear") is showing just how naive they are. Just because you are American I understand you want to believe that Lance is clean. Same applies for Aussies with McGee, the French with Virenque and Voecklar, the Brits with Millar... oops, I guess that one's been proven already...

In direct reply to the question "Why is only Armstrong accused of doping?", actually he is not. If you did a search on many of the rider's backgrounds you would find that many of them have been tainted with the doping brush... eg Ullrich was implicated in the Giro affair of 2002, we all know about Virenque, Brochard and the rest of the Festina gang, and so the list goes on...

My opinion is that the UCI does sweet FA in preventing, and I stress PREVENTING, doping from going on. Life ban I say.

One last thing, I wish the 'LA Confidential' book was available in English. I'd buy it for sure. It'd be great reading. Some truths revealed///...:::///
I meant that how come Armstrong is mass accused whereas other riders aren't.

Ullrich has had bad occasions yet they last nowhere near as long as lance's. And basso I may be wrong but i've heard nothing but how promising he is. No drugs mentioned just talent.

Armstrong is tormented by accusations whereas a lot of other riders appear to be unnoticed by the critics.

Why is this?
wheresullrich? is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet