Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 28-07.-2004, 10:09 PM   #16
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Cosidering that your hero only races three weeks in every year - all of your points above are defunct.


Okay, let's rephrase it then. Simeoni is dead in the water in the TdF until Armstrong is no longer racing in it. I would guess that other USPS (Discovery Network) riders aren't going to exactly make life easy for Simeoni either. He's made his bed. Nighty night.
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 10:29 PM   #17
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,557
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by meehs
Okay, let's rephrase it then. Simeoni is dead in the water in the TdF until Armstrong is no longer racing in it. I would guess that other USPS (Discovery Network) riders aren't going to exactly make life easy for Simeoni either. He's made his bed. Nighty night.


I think you over estimate the level of support for Armstrong's actions.

I think it was a very very foolish move by Armstrong.
Why did he do it ?
Simeoni never accused LA of any wrongdoing.
He accused Ferrari and Armstrong then waded in and called Simeoni a liar for accusing Ferrari.
Simeoni then sued Armstrong for slander.

Simeoni's testimony in respect of Ferrari has nothing to do with Armstrong.
Or has it ?
Why did Armstrong get so defensive and start calling Simeoni a liar ?
Why did Armstrong feel the need to defend Ferrari ?

There is more to this than meets the eye.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 10:30 PM   #18
DTMwood
Registered User
 
DTMwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County, New York
Posts: 22
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Cosidering that your hero only races three weeks in every year - all of your points above are defunct.



Ummmm. Take a look where he's racing this weekend. You may now remove your foot from your mouth.
DTMwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 10:31 PM   #19
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,557
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTMwood
Ummmm. Take a look where he's racing this weekend. You may now remove your foot from your mouth.


He's taking part in criteriums - standard stuff for a TDF winner and the TDF
podium placements.

I was referring to races - not criteriums.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 10:33 PM   #20
DTMwood
Registered User
 
DTMwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange County, New York
Posts: 22
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
He's taking part in criteriums - standard stuff for a TDF winner and the TDF
podium placements.

I was referring to races - not criteriums.



Point taken
DTMwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 11:20 PM   #21
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Why did Armstrong feel the need to defend Ferrari ?


It is not unusual for a man of honor to stand up for a friend...especially if he believes (rightly or wrongly) said friend to be innocent.

Naturally, I would not expect you to offer such an obvious probability since it does not fit into your agenda.
Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 11:26 PM   #22
jhuskey
Registered User
 
jhuskey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,506
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Cosidering that your hero only races three weeks in every year - all of your points above are defunct.


So if the TDF don't mean crap ,after all it is only a couple of weeks , why is everyone except for Lance supporters so upset. Let just say anyone can win one race even if it is Le Tour, Armstrong is no threat, Europe rules and drop it.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike.
jhuskey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28-07.-2004, 11:32 PM   #23
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
I think you over estimate the level of support for Armstrong's actions.

I think it was a very very foolish move by Armstrong.
Why did he do it ?
Simeoni never accused LA of any wrongdoing.
He accused Ferrari and Armstrong then waded in and called Simeoni a liar for accusing Ferrari.
Simeoni then sued Armstrong for slander.

Simeoni's testimony in respect of Ferrari has nothing to do with Armstrong.
Or has it ?
Why did Armstrong get so defensive and start calling Simeoni a liar ?
Why did Armstrong feel the need to defend Ferrari ?

There is more to this than meets the eye.


You may be right about there being more to Armstrong's defense of Ferrari than meets the eye. Whether or not anything comes of it remains to be seen however. From what I've heard so far the legal case against Ferrari is flimsy at best. I'm not saying that I think Ferrari is beyond reproach (far from it) but I don't know if they have to goods to hang him. None of us know the nature of Armstrong's relationship with Ferrari, again it's all just speculation at this point.

I think you may very well be underestimating Armstrong's influence in the peleton (whether he's present or not). I've said before that I think it was poor form for LA to chase down Simeoni in stage 18. But right or wrong I think that by making a big issue out of it, Simeoni may very well have dealt a severe blow to his own cycling career. We shall see.
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 12:16 AM   #24
tin kicker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
You make it sound like the Italian Courts are some sort of dilletantes.

The Formula 1 crash in question refers to Aryton Senna : one of the greatest
F1 drivers ever.

I think that this would constitute a judicial investigation.



The Italian courts have been pretty good at criminalizing things that should be handled in civil court over the last few years. They recently sentenced an air traffic controller and an airport manager to several years of jail time because of a crash caused by an idiot who was flying/taxiing a Lear in a totally incorrect manner. This idiot got out on the wrong runway because he was lost in the fog. They went after the controller because he "should have known where Lear was" even though the visibility was less than 100 Meters. And the manager because the signs should have been better even though the signage was compliant with ICAO standards. The whole accident was caused by the idiot Lear pilot, but he was a fatality so they couldn't get any blood out of that turnip so they went after the surviving controller and airport authority.

So, going after race car teams and cycling pros is not beyond the pale for them, even if it makes no sense to the rest of the world.
tin kicker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 01:02 AM   #25
mattp71
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 106
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Italian authorities to me seem like a bunch of jackass's. Italian authorities are charging the guy or guys who supplied pantani with his fatal coke with murder. That's as dumb as a lot of other stuff I read about going on in Italy.

I'm suprised Pantani's mom hasn't sued Italian authorities for wrongful death. After all, they are what killed him and provoked him to do coke and whatever else he was doing.
mattp71 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 01:30 AM   #26
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,557
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted B
It is not unusual for a man of honor to stand up for a friend...especially if he believes (rightly or wrongly) said friend to be innocent.

Naturally, I would not expect you to offer such an obvious probability since it does not fit into your agenda.


How would you know that I am not an honourable person, eh ?
Because I cast doubt on Lance Armstrong - you conclude that I have no notion of honour ?

Look at your hero and honour.
Isn't the word, honour, part of a wedding vow ?

Honour - if you want to play dirty pal, we can.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 01:33 AM   #27
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,557
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhuskey
So if the TDF don't mean crap ,after all it is only a couple of weeks , why is everyone except for Lance supporters so upset. Let just say anyone can win one race even if it is Le Tour, Armstrong is no threat, Europe rules and drop it.


Musette made the point that by allegedly upsetting LA, Simeoni was digging his own grave, in her view.
I stated that LA only races for a three weeks per year - meaning that it is unlikely that Armstrong will compete against Simeoni outside of the TDF :
that's the point i was trying to convey.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 01:40 AM   #28
birdman23
Registered User
 
birdman23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 571
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
How would you know that I am not an honourable person, eh ?
Because I cast doubt on Lance Armstrong - you conclude that I have no notion of honour ?

Look at your hero and honour.
Isn't the word, honour, part of a wedding vow ?

Honour - if you want to play dirty pal, we can.

That's lame Limerickman. How many other pro riders honor their vows? I am sure Lance is the only rider in the peloton to ever have gotten a divorce. Give me a freakin' break. His personal life and that of other riders in the peloton should have no place for discussion in these forums. Time for everyone to grow up.
__________________
May the road you ride be a good road!
birdman23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 01:47 AM   #29
Ted B
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 552
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
How would you know that I am not an honourable person, eh ?


I base my opinion on your past record of frequent, consistent Armstrong bashing in this part of the forum and others and the twisting of the obvious associated therewith. I may not be able to prove it, but this my belief based upon convincing circumstantial evidence what I derive from my research.

Sounds familiar?

Ted B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29-07.-2004, 02:01 AM   #30
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,557
Default Re: Armstrong/Seimoni Round 2...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted B
I base my opinion on your past record of frequent, consistent Armstrong bashing in this part of the forum and others and the twisting of the obvious associated therewith. I may not be able to prove it, but this my belief based upon convincing circumstantial evidence what I derive from my research.

Sounds familiar?



I have explained to you why I question LA's record.
If I questioned LA record because I disliked the fact that his is American or from Texas - that would be biased bashing and dishonourable.

I have set out to you, repeatedly, the statistical basis and the contemporaneous basis, as to why I doubt LA's authenticity.

You then decided to have a go at my honour.
YOU INTRODUCED THIS ASPECT TO THIS DISCUSSION.

If someone is honourable - it is not a mutually exclusive issue trait.
Honour applies to both personal and professional (sporting outlook) life.
So is it your contention that LA is honourable ?
If you are, I suggest, he is duplicitous : he's honourable in defending his friend
Ferrari, but he dishonoured his wife by reneging on a vow.
there !
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet