![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 622
|
I have the s725 and am loving it. I collect information on a Latitude using its integrated IrDA with no problems, and use the Polar USB IrDA interface on another XP Pro desktop system with no issues.
Only thought so far is that I may actually like the style T31 transmitter better than the new flexible WearLink version. That's not a big deal though, just a bit of personal preference. Otherwise, I am gathering and using both speed and cadence data. Down the road, like maybe if Santa brings it to me, I could see getting the Power Output sensor as well. The Precision Performance software is pretty easy to use and provides all the information that I would want. The graphs are terrific and have helped me a lot when I come back to the computer and analyze my ride. Hope this helps. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
Don't do it if you need accurate data. I am about to send mine back to the vendor because it is too inaccurate to use as a coaching tool. If you just want a general idea of how much you did that day the Polar is fine. For example my coach had me do 4 intervals the other day for power testing. 3 of them were done on a very slight grade with brisk winds. #1 and #3 were down the grade with the wind (27-28 mph) and I was putting out some good wattage. #2 (same road, other direction) was into the wind and up the slight grade (about 17-18 mph) with significantly lower wattage! Heart rate was about the same for all if the intervals.One other thing to consider is that it is very difficult to install. One problem that I had was that it was impossible to install within their spec. I run a 12-27 most of the time due to my high cadence training and the local hills. The chain has to stay between 10-30 mm of the sensor. If you use more than a 32 or so it won't be in that range. In my test above the chain was running in that range. Just yesterday I was putting out almost 250 watts soft pedaling down a hill and 275 going up a steepr one! It seems that it has problems at higher speeds. I would highly recommend looking into the Power Tap if the purchase is performance driven. The only thing missing there is the altitude but it nice that with an extra $60 sensor you can move it easily between bikes. I also takes data samples more frequently which helps with accuracy also. I like my s725 for everything else but just a friendly caution on the Power option. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Also, I have the s720 and think it is great for most things. My biggest criticism is that it has so many features that it can be difficult to remember how to use each one -- hence the altitude confusion above! I also have the power sensor and, so far, have had relatively good luck with it. My readings are quite consistent with power computed using other methods. From my own experience I can't see what has caused people so much trouble (and I do have a 52-42-30 triple with 12-27 rear cassette so in theory a difficult combination). My complaint about the polar power is something different. I find the chain tension sensor a bit of a nuisance at lights/stop signs. The magnet inside it sucks the chain down on top of it when you aren't pedaling, which can be a bit of a nuisance when you get going again as the chain is sometimes slightly offline at first (this does not cause any problems while actually riding though). |
|
|
|
|