![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: ..... > > Motorways are restricted roads closed to a variety of slower- > moving traffic including horses, low-power motorcycles and > learners. They are generally designed and built as restricted > roads. This is done almost entirely for the benefit of car > drivers. In Canada, that would certainly be true. Freeways and toll roads are built for motorized traffic only, just as railroads are restricted to a particular class of vehicle. (We also have busways for buses only.) When a public highway is converted to a freeway, adequate alternative routes have to exist or be provided, e.g. the adding of a parallel service road. One of the reasons we are able to successfully fight the occasional municipal "bike ban" is because "public highways" are exactly that - highways for public use, and the right to travel on them goes back at least to Roman times and I'd imagine is well-established in English common law. Many of our legal precedents are inherited from the latter. There's an interesting related article on a US bike ban at: http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/7346.0.html JFJ, Canada |
|
|
#47 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The point is that one does not have to cross them at all - on at one,
off at the next. I agree 100% that crossing merge lanes of all kinds is one of the most dangerous manoeuvres on a bike. -- Peter Headland |