![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Helen Deborah Vecht <helenvecht@zetnet.co.uk> of wrote:
>Richard Bates <usenet01@artybee.net>typed > > >> That is exactly what I'm trying to avoid - The Look. I'm after >> something comfy and practical but normal looking. > >Ordinary trousers[1] and LONG socks into which you can tuck your trouser leg. Or ordinary socks, and a pair of Aldi yellow reflective bands with flashing red LEDs for after dark. -- Error reading FAT table. Try SKINNY one? (Y/N) Steph Peters delete invalid from incm@sandbenders.demon.co.uk.invalid Tatting, lace & stitching page <http://www.sandbenders.demon.co.uk/index.htm> |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Clive George" <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message news:32r0vgF3r1mqiU1@individual.net... > > long socks are the Work of Stan T great :-) :~( |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
David Martin <d.m.a.martin@dundee.ac.uk> writes:
>On 21/12/04 12:29 pm, in article vm5gs0ho95ufu3g47vcrudk1eonlfp21d6@4ax.com, >"Richard Bates" <usenet01@artybee.net> wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:16:38 +0000, Simon Brooke >> <simon@jasmine.org.uk> wrote: >>> in message <knufs09ta2lbf4vdei1npvnnvudb4p9ajn@4ax.com>, Richard Bates >>> ('usenet01@artybee.net') wrote: >>>> Can anybody recommend some trousers which are suitable for cycling in >>>> (i.e. don't have loose flappy ankles, are cut higher at the rear) but >>>> which do not make me stick out like a sore thumb as a lycra-clad prat >>>> when browsing the shops? >>> I have some Altura waterproof overtrousers. They're OK, but not >>> wonderful if you're cycling fast. Lycra longs with waterproof fronts >>> and breathable backs are better, if you don't mind the look. >> That is exactly what I'm trying to avoid - The Look. I'm after >> something comfy and practical but normal looking. >I have some spring type cycle clips that I haven't seen anywhere else, ever. >They are a spring with reflective bits that wrap round whatever trousers you >happen to be wearing. Much better than anything else. A tip passed on to me by my grandfather was that if you've forgotten your bike clips you can tuck your trousers into your socks. -- Chris Malcolm cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Clive George" <clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
>"Tony W" <tonyremove@chapmore.co.uk> wrote in message >news:32quj8F3o5fp3U2@individual.net... >> "Helen Deborah Vecht" <helenvecht@zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:313030303736393541C8260152@zetnet.co.uk... >> > Ordinary trousers[1] and LONG socks into which you can tuck your trouser >> leg. >> Long socks are the work of Stan >Fortunately my local shop has started selling them again - for a while, >fashion meant it was getting jolly hard to get a decent pair of long socks >easily. Fashion moves so fast these days. When I were a young lad, when a pair of shoes wore out, I'd say to meself, "Those were good shoes, I'll get another pair of them", and there they would be, on the shelf in the same shop. Nowadays you're lucky if they haven't changed the fashion on you by the time your socks have worn out, and as for going to get the same pair of shoes, forget the shoes, you're lucky if the shoe shop hasn't turned into a sandwich bar. -- Chris Malcolm cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk +44 (0)131 651 3445 DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chris Malcolm wrote:
> > A tip passed on to me by my grandfather was that if you've forgotten > your bike clips you can tuck your trousers into your socks. > Unless you are "nobody" in which case you tuck them into only two of your three socks ;-) Tony |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chris Malcolm wrote:
> > Fashion moves so fast these days. When I were a young lad, when a pair > of shoes wore out, I'd say to meself, "Those were good shoes, I'll get > another pair of them" Nah, I'd say "I'll see if mum will get me some Clarke's Commandos, 'cause they're cool"[1] Pete. [1] i.e., had the word "Commando" involved and were the favourite shoes of your pals for that very reason, which was all you needed in the 70s to impress a lad. For those not familiar they were in no way military or commando-like, just slip on black leather shoes with a 'C' on the side of the heel. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Clinch wrote:
> Chris Malcolm wrote: > >> >> Fashion moves so fast these days. When I were a young lad, when a pair >> of shoes wore out, I'd say to meself, "Those were good shoes, I'll get >> another pair of them" > > > Nah, I'd say "I'll see if mum will get me some Clarke's Commandos, > 'cause they're cool"[1] > > Pete. > > [1] i.e., had the word "Commando" involved and were the favourite shoes > of your pals for that very reason, which was all you needed in the 70s > to impress a lad. For those not familiar they were in no way military > or commando-like, just slip on black leather shoes with a 'C' on the > side of the heel. I thought they were one with the compass in the heel? I seem to recall that had soles that imprinted the tracks of small animals in the mud too.. Crazy days! Julesh |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Julesh wrote:
> I thought they were one with the compass in the heel? > > I seem to recall that had soles that imprinted the tracks of small > animals in the mud too.. Maybe earlier or subsequent versions did, but not the ones I or any of my cohorts had. They were just called "Commandos", and that was enough! Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:43:33 GMT, Julesh
<canned_lunchmeat@hotmail.com> wrote: >I thought they were one with the compass in the heel? > >I seem to recall that had soles that imprinted the tracks of small >animals in the mud too.. > I think they were Clarks Trackers, I'm sure all my mates had them Cheers Richard Please remove THIS if replying |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:22:41 GMT, ric_rd350@THIStesco.net (Richard M)
wrote: >On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:43:33 GMT, Julesh ><canned_lunchmeat@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>I thought they were one with the compass in the heel? >> >>I seem to recall that had soles that imprinted the tracks of small >>animals in the mud too.. >> >I think they were Clarks Trackers, I'm sure all my mates had them I had a pair of those. Some of you people must be older than you look. -- Dave... Get a bicycle. You will not regret it. If you live. - Mark Twain |
|