![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
See thread titled 'Thanks .. '
DOLL (Doddery Old Little Lady) came by this morning to see how I was, same car, but even more dents and scrapes in it. She found where I lived 'cos most folk round here know I'm the Caretaker at the Infant and Junior schools in the village. Anyway, she's fine and dandy and "not at all worried about driving" so she is still driving, "but only on roads I know and where I know I'm going" and "only when it's light enough to see properly". The second one really struck home, it seems she's partially sighted and wears dark sunglasses, which didn't register with me during the accident, and when we had our accident she had been wearing them, even though I was wearing sulphur yellow glasses to heighten the brightness / contrast, it being a particularly dull day. Apparently she'd also hit a car at the next roundabout after leaving me, but "it was only a small accident", and she was "in no fit state to drive, really" ... I was gob-smacked .... After already deciding that I was going to write this one off, I'm now going through her insurance company for everything. New pedals, seat, bar grips, shoes, gloves, shirt, jacket and track pants, all of which, 'cept the jacket, only got scuffed really and are pretty serviceable, plus a couple of hundred for hassle, pain and suffering (whatever they call it) etc .. ![]() She wanted to give me £100 for the crash instead of going through insurance because she thinks they'll take her licence away if she's "investigated AGAIN" .. her words, my emphasis ... I said nothing to her directly, just got her full insurance details, home address etc etc, which I hadn't bothered with at the time of the accident. (St00pid, I know, but hey ... ) I think every road user would be better without her on the road, personally, and while I can't be certain that they'll take her licence away, I do think that if I follow proper channels it _is_ likely. While I feel a pang of conscience at depriving an old lady of some freedom, I feel that the safety of others is of more concern, so I'm playing it 'by the book'. If she hadn't come round and tried to bribe me, or if she'd have simply posted the £100 and a note saying sorry, no-one would know any more about it., nothing more would have been done. As it is I now feel compelled to do things properly, and if it means her loss of licence, then I think everyone using the roads would be better off. Still can't help feeling like a bit of a shit though ... So, 2 options, what would others do? 1. Report her via the insurance company, or 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php (8(!) Homer Rules ... ![]() "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote:
> If she hadn't come round and tried to bribe me, or if she'd have > simply posted the £100 and a note saying sorry, no-one would know any > more about it., nothing more would have been done. As it is I now > feel compelled to do things properly, and if it means her loss of > licence, then I think everyone using the roads would be better off. > > Still can't help feeling like a bit of a shit though ... > > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. It sounds like she has probably caused accidents before and could kill a cyclist next time, and anyway £100 is pretty derisory for an injury accident - I thought more like £1000 was about the going rate for even a minor injury these days. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
> > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. > > Make the claim. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:33kttoF42bl8aU1@individual.net... > > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. You can always wait and see who she hits next. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:22:25 +0000, MSeries <skankmartin@hotmail.com>
wrote: >Paul - xxx wrote: > >> >> So, 2 options, what would others do? >> >> 1. Report her via the insurance company, >> or >> 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. >> >> > >Make the claim. or 3: Make the claim in order to potentially make the roads safer. Donate the money (which you say you had already written off) to a charity of your choice. Maybe donate it to a local organisation which provides community transport to elderly people who are unable to drive? -- Amazon: "If you are interested in 'Asimov's I-Robot', you may also be interested in 'Garfield - The Movie'. ... erm, how do they figure that one out? |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
> See thread titled 'Thanks .. ' > > DOLL (Doddery Old Little Lady) came by this morning to see how I was, same > car, but even more dents and scrapes in it. She found where I lived 'cos > most folk round here know I'm the Caretaker at the Infant and Junior schools > in the village. Anyway, she's fine and dandy and "not at all worried about > driving" so she is still driving, "but only on roads I know and where I know > I'm going" and "only when it's light enough to see properly". > > The second one really struck home, it seems she's partially sighted and > wears dark sunglasses, which didn't register with me during the accident, > and when we had our accident she had been wearing them, even though I was > wearing sulphur yellow glasses to heighten the brightness / contrast, it > being a particularly dull day. Apparently she'd also hit a car at the next > roundabout after leaving me, but "it was only a small accident", and she was > "in no fit state to drive, really" ... I was gob-smacked .... > > After already deciding that I was going to write this one off, I'm now going > through her insurance company for everything. New pedals, seat, bar grips, > shoes, gloves, shirt, jacket and track pants, all of which, 'cept the > jacket, only got scuffed really and are pretty serviceable, plus a couple of > hundred for hassle, pain and suffering (whatever they call it) etc .. ![]() > > She wanted to give me £100 for the crash instead of going through insurance > because she thinks they'll take her licence away if she's "investigated > AGAIN" .. her words, my emphasis ... I said nothing to her directly, just > got her full insurance details, home address etc etc, which I hadn't > bothered with at the time of the accident. (St00pid, I know, but hey ... ) > > I think every road user would be better without her on the road, personally, > and while I can't be certain that they'll take her licence away, I do think > that if I follow proper channels it _is_ likely. While I feel a pang of > conscience at depriving an old lady of some freedom, I feel that the safety > of others is of more concern, so I'm playing it 'by the book'. How would that pang of concience compare with the pang you would feel when she goes on to kill or maim someone? Also, do not fall in to the trap of equating driving with freedom. > If she hadn't come round and tried to bribe me, or if she'd have simply > posted the £100 and a note saying sorry, no-one would know any more about > it., nothing more would have been done. As it is I now feel compelled to do > things properly, and if it means her loss of licence, then I think everyone > using the roads would be better off. > > Still can't help feeling like a bit of a shit though ... > > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. For everyone's sake, report her. No question. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Richard Bates composed the following ...
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:22:25 +0000, MSeries <skankmartin@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Paul - xxx wrote: >> >>> >>> So, 2 options, what would others do? >>> >>> 1. Report her via the insurance company, >>> or >>> 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. >>> >>> >> >> Make the claim. > > or 3: > > Make the claim in order to potentially make the roads safer. That was my main aim ... > Donate the money (which you say you had already written off) to a > charity of your choice. Maybe donate it to a local organisation which > provides community transport to elderly people who are unable to > drive? Actually .. I was semi-planning, just thinking about it really, of setting up a local model car club for the schools I am caretaker at. We have little available cash and the kids have very few local facilities so it would do some good locally. However, I'll check up and see what's available locally for elderly peoples transport. There is an old peoples home directly across from one of my schools, so they might know. Good suggestion, thanks. I was not planning to keep the money raised (can't think of a more apt description) for myself in any case, 'cept for maybe a replacement jacket, but was trying to think of something appropriate. -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php (8(!) Homer Rules ... ![]() "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
>> > 1. Report her via the insurance company, and a letter to DVLA giving her details and account of what she said to you. Don't feel bad, you are reporting a crime. pk |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:33kttoF42bl8aU1@individual.net... > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. Paul, forget about feeling mean go for 1. She sounds as least as arrogant as incompetent. Anyway, most of us hand over plenty to insurance companies, it's your right to claim. A story I've already related: A bright summers day, me wearing a bright red top. I was at the head of a queue at a red light, when it turned green off I sprinted. A car driven by a DOLL slowly drew alongside and as we passed a side street it made a left turn, this was not a classic case of a car overtaking then once ahead cutting me up, she was actually alongside! I had no choice but to turn left also, as I did I rapped on the front passenger window in anger, such was the proximtiy <1>. I followed the car to a car park and vented my spleen <2>, normally that would have been the end of the story but as I rode off the bleedin' obvious occurred to me that if she couldn't see me, or register me, what could she see? So I went to the police satation and made a formal complaint, last I ever heard of it but at least I felt I'd done my bit. <1> At the risk of being immodest I think a combination of bike handling skills, good peripheral vision and a bit of luck saved my bacon. <2> The DOLL didn't even know what the fuss was about and never apologised nor asked if I was ok, pig ignorant! Pete |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
> So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. Make the claim. She might kill the next person she hits - it sounds like she's driving by braille! FWIW, if someone damages my car or my property with their car, I always go through the insurance. I don't want to talk to that person, or negotiate with their husband/wife/mother/children. Let the professionals deal with it. Regards, Pete. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
> Still can't help feeling like a bit of a shit though ... No, you're doing the right & proper thing. > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, Yes, and the police (again?). ~PB |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote:
> See thread titled 'Thanks .. ' [snip] > So, 2 options, what would others do? > > 1. Report her via the insurance company, > or > 2. leave it and chalk it down to experience. For the reasons you eloquently set out, it has to be 1. She is a public menace; there is good reason to think you might save lives, perhaps including hers. As Sandy did with Miss Jean Brodie (another dangerous old bat with no clue about the implications of her actions), somebody has to put a stop to her. -- Joe * If I cannot be free I'll be cheap |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx composed the following ...
> 1. Report her via the insurance company, Agreement .. In my Head and Heart I figured / knew it would be this, but I still feel like a bit of a 'tell-tale'. However, as has been pointed out and what I know of her and her demeanour, she _will_ cause an accident again if she's allowed to drive freely, it's only a matter of time before she really hurts someone I guess. So the insurance forms and stuff are filled in and sent, via email and snail mail. I also had a chat with the local (well, have to phone Sheffield 'cos stations are not manned) police who have filled out a report and say they will, in due course, send someone to have a chat with her. Hopefully even just the sight of a bobby at her front door (if one does go) will put enough fear into her to stop her driving. Thanks all for the re-assurance. Addendum to the above .. Speaking between the lines the policeman intimated and hinted that there is too much of this type of thing happening, it seems, and the police in South Yorkshire are having a move to more pro-active traffic policing in our area, especially when it's either very young or very old drivers, and especially those involved in minor accidents, so I think something positive might just happen. He has asked if a policeman might visit me 'for a chat' related to the above, so there is potential for further follow ups to this. -- Paul ... http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php (8(!) Homer Rules ... ![]() "A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using." |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Paul - xxx wrote: > Paul - xxx composed the following ... > .. Hopefully even > just the sight of a bobby at her front door (if one does go) will put enough > fear into her to stop her driving. If you push for it she should be charged with careless driving at least. If she didn't show you her insurance certificate at the time of the accident or report the accident within 24 hours thats another offence. Not to menton her dodgy eyesight. Perhaps the police could suggest that as an alternative to prosecution she surrenders her licence. The main thing is to get her off the roads for public safety and if she would surender her licence voluntarily then there would seem little point her being taken to court. Iain |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Simon Mason wrote:
> I'd go through the insurance and if it gets her off the road then that will > only make the roads safer for everybody else. There are buses in Doncaster, > so she should get a season OAP pass and dump her car for good. Or she could > get a PC and get stuff delivered to her door. My Gran voluntarily returned her license when she felt unable to drive. Whilst her eyesight was technically fine, here visual awareness was sufficiently to pot that she managed to put her BMW in a ditch twice the first time she drove it after a long layoff. The money you get for the car buys an awful lot of taxi fares and nice drivers who will carry your shopping to the door. You are doing the right thing. I'd insist in any accident where inability to drive safely may be a factor that 1) plod attend and 2) the person is sight tested. This problem is only going to get worse as the population ages. ...d |
|