Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-02.-2005, 07:27 AM   #31
GIFF07
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 74
Default Re: What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

I beleive that the reason why Lance is able to win the TDF year after year is due to:
1) His team of hand picked riders. That is built around him and his winning of the TDF.

2) His ability to preview each important stage and design a strategy on when and where to attack.

3) His teams scouting of other teams and riders.

4) His director sportif Johan Brunel (sp.) that budgets the team resources allowing Lance to do all of these things and putting the priority of the team on winning the TDF.


As far as if Lance is on dope or not:

I feel that he is innocent until proven guilty, but I do have my doubts.
GIFF07 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02.-2005, 08:02 AM   #32
DV1976
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 348
Default Re: What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

Quote:
Originally Posted by birdman23
You are correct, you don't know me. So keep your mouth shut before you tell me to keep my mouth shut. If my remark sounded sarcastic to you then I applaud your intelligence and my writing skills because sarcasm is exactly what I was trying to convey. You have chosen not to notice my other posts on this forum as well. I will call out anyone who makes ignorant, generalized comments. If you haven't figured it out I was trying to keep the post to cycling by shutting up the ignorant comments. Take a look at the thread and see if Micron rebuttled? He didn't because I was right and he probably recognized it and was gentleman enough to retract.
I did not tell you to keep your mouth shut. I was not referring (and I made it clear) to you so what's your fucking problem? If you want it to pursue this any further send pm. Lets not screw the topic...
DV1976 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02.-2005, 08:21 AM   #33
birdman23
Registered User
 
birdman23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 571
Default Re: What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

My post was in your reply, the one where you said "shut your mouth" and no you did NOT make it clear as to whom you were speaking.

I have no problem but apparently you do when you are rebuked a little. No I do not want to waste my time PM'ing you about this. You need to chill out because you will soon see that this entire forum is full of opinions and every thread gets off topic.
I repeat I was trying to bring the thread back to topic by stopping the anti-american statements. READ other threads on this forum and you will see that someone makes some derogatory comment about another country and then the whole thread goes right down the drain as people try to defend their country.

Any other long-timer on the forums want to back me up on this.

So as far as I am concerned DV this is over and you can get back to the purity of this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DV1976
I did not tell you to keep your mouth shut. I was not referring (and I made it clear) to you so what's your fucking problem? If you want it to pursue this any further send pm. Lets not screw the topic...
__________________
May the road you ride be a good road!
birdman23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02.-2005, 08:28 AM   #34
DV1976
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 348
Wink Re: What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

birdman23 here is my quote. I believe that is clear that I was not referring to you (btw sorry Espada it was a bit strong).

Quote:
Originally Posted by DV1976
This forum and topic is about cycling not each other's beliefs about the US/Europe. Keep it that way. If you haven't got any better arguments than this then just keep your mouth shut (and this goes to you Espada).
Happy?
No hard feelings I hope.
DV1976 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02.-2005, 09:02 AM   #35
birdman23
Registered User
 
birdman23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 571
Default Re: What would it take to convince you Lance did not dope?

My mistake. I thought you were directing it at me because my post was in your thread. No hard feelings.

In response to the thread title:

He admits it or is caught cheating. Other than that he remains innocent in my book. "Caught or Confession"





Quote:
Originally Posted by DV1976
birdman23 here is my quote. I believe that is clear that I was not referring to you (btw sorry Espada it was a bit strong).

Happy?
No hard feelings I hope.
__________________
May the road you ride be a good road!
birdman23 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet