![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#121 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 121
|
Losing weight has an effect not only on going uphill but also on the flat.
http://www.kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm Use the above link, set the watts at o and enter 30 mph or 50 kph and see what the difference in power output at various weights is to maintain this. Dropping 8-10 Kg substantialy reduces the amount of power output needed to maintain this speed. Add in that over a three week tour that extra weight is going to have a toll on you. While I don't know if Armstrong was or has used performence enhancing drugs lossing weight helps a hell of a lot. Especially over a three week tour. I remember reading Indurain stating that losing weight helped improved his time trialing and win the tour in 91. He wasn't winning or dominating time trials previous to this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 997
|
Quote:
Will this do? Lance Response To French Doping Investigation Lance Armstrong issued the following statement Thursday, Jan 20 in response to media reports of a French judge's decision to investigate doping allegations made against him last year in a highly publicized book. "Let me make one thing emphatically clear: I believe in clean and fair competition. As I have said before, I do not use -- and have never used -- performance-enhancing drugs. I am disappointed in the judge's decision to open this investigation without having talked to me first. " "I will make myself available anytime and anywhere to meet with the investigators in this case. They are also welcome to review my long history of tests for performance-enhancing drugs, which I have never failed. Last year alone I was tested 22 times by ASO, the UCI, WADA and USADA. I will be competing in Paris-Nice in March. I am confident my name will be cleared, and I look forward to racing in France for years to come." SOURCE: Capital Sports and Entertainment, Austin, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16
|
I know a lot of people feel that the Europeans are critical of Lance' success, (and some are), and deliberately target him, but bear in mind that they also investigate their own riders, and just because Lance is an American, and successful doesn't mean he should be exempt from investigation.
The judge was within his rights to order the investigation, Lance will have to put up with it. But certainly the only way to eliminate drugs from th sport is to keep investigating. I don't know whether Lance dopes, i hope not, but some things are always going to look suspicious. Last edited by oldnbusted : 22-01.-2005 at 06:29 AM. Reason: i forgot to write something |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 589
|
the one test that seems to be working is the EPO test - and that has only really been in place since Sydney. HGH - no test. Insulin - no test. Autologous (with your own blood) transfusion - no test. Cortisone can be tested for and Armstrong fell foul of that.
These are not 'super juices' or amazing drug cocktails that have taken hundreds of people to develop. You can buy HGH off the Internet for god's sake. What they are are drugs with medical applications that can be used to help recovery - and we all know that the rider who recovers best wins the race. 22 tests - well, let's see, how many of those would have taken place at the Tour? Stage winner and yellow jersey get tested automatically - so that makes 12 of those tests at the Tour alone... |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 997
|
Quote:
The anti-Lance crowd sits around parsing his quoted words like Bill Clinton in a grand jury deposition and salivates: "Look, he's never categorically denied any performance enhancing drugs" (although he has a number of times) In response to the direct question I put up the quote and no one is big enough to say, well there he is denying it categorically. Seems like your minds are impermeable to logic or evidence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
Wow. Even Lance's car takes drugs? This is worse than I thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
I saw this statement by LA after I posted my question about his previous responses to doping allegations. A few further queries: * he denies drug use but where does he deny blood doping? * has he previously made a categorical denial of drug use and/or blood doping (I can't seem to find one)? * why on earth should the judge consult a suspect prior to launching an investigation? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
So Armstrong now has an unfair equipment advantage? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that Ullrich could use some of his $3 million salary to get access to any wind tunnel he wants. I would also hazard to guess that every top pro (if they're smart) undergoes wind tunnel testing for time trial position. As for the high tech skin suit, I think you can buy them from Nike if you want, but I doubt it will mean the difference between 1st and 2nd place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Most of this stuff is not empirical data. Heck, it isn't even coincidence. For example, what does Millar's positive have to do with Lance? Or the Festina affair? Or the fact that Pantani ODed while using a recreational drug recreationally? And why throw in the fact that Chris Horner is now back in the European peloton? Is it because he's American? Other information is extremely misleading. For example, LA did not fail a cortisone test in the 1999 Tour. To do that, he would have had to reach limit. Instead, they detected a tiny, tiny fraction of that. If you remember the UCI statement, it read: "The UCI declares with the utmost firmness that this was an authorized usage, and does not constitute a case of doping." And what about the Merckx charge? Mentor to Lance? Despite the fact that "mentor" is pushing it big time, so what? So Eddy doped. There is no logical reason to believe that Eddy doping would mean that Lance dopes. Lance is his own man. Look, it's impossible to prove a negative, so this speculation will go on forever. But I'll say again, there is no reliable or incontravertible evidence that LA doped/dopes/will dope.
__________________
Harry |
|
|
|
|