Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


The misconception of buying the cheapest

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-01.-2005, 07:20 PM   #31
Zardoz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The misconception of buying the cheapest

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:28:36 +0000, David Martin
<d.m.a.martin@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:

>I have winged at length before about how my wonderful road bike has been
>running the same rear mech for many tens of thousands of km. And it has. I
>stripped it down and the bushings are smooth ceramic, as they should be.
>
>My MTB is not so fortunate. It started life with an Acera or Altus.
>Something of that ilk, which lasted for a while. Being mean, I then bought a
>shimano reversed cable thinghy which gave up working reliably almost before
>it went on the bike (1 week commuting).
>



My experience with chain suck was the reverse - I upgraded to a nine
speed MTB with XT components and started getting it quite badly, to
the point where it bent my granny ring. My cheap but reliable 7 speed
never had this problem.

The problem seems to be that 9 speed chains + gears are engineered to
a much higher tolerance so if the components aren't accurately matched
then things start going awry.

In this case it didn't get fixed til I swapped out the chain with a
decent non-shimano one. (sorry - can't remember the brand but it was
about £35, one of the better ones in the shop). My experience with
Shimano chains has been pretty bad all round....
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2005, 08:30 PM   #32
Arthur Clune
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The misconception of buying the cheapest

Eatmorepies <stopthere@lineone.net> wrote:

: XT is the one to buy.

I got a very nasty shock when I found out how much new XT
9 speed jockey wheels are though.

Arthur

--
Arthur Clune PGP/GPG Key: http://www.clune.org/pubkey.txt
It is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01.-2005, 05:00 AM   #33
Peter B
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The misconception of buying the cheapest


"Zardoz" <me@you.twang> wrote in message
news:uc0nu058doricl2voql842hq5agorsd31n@4ax.com...
> My experience with chain suck was the reverse - I upgraded to a nine
> speed MTB with XT components and started getting it quite badly, to
> the point where it bent my granny ring. My cheap but reliable 7 speed
> never had this problem.


I used to get chainsuck on my 7 speed mtb. I also have had it on my current
9 speed, the only cure is to change the ring in this case whether it looks
worn or not.

> In this case it didn't get fixed til I swapped out the chain with a
> decent non-shimano one. (sorry - can't remember the brand but it was
> about £35, one of the better ones in the shop). My experience with
> Shimano chains has been pretty bad all round....


Never bother with Shimano chains myself unless they're original equipment. I
much prefer SRAM which come with the brilliant "Powerlink".

Pete


  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com