Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Protection from the elements

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-01.-2005, 07:42 AM   #1
the.Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Protection from the elements

I've just come across this
http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml

I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no problems.
--
Mark

1x1 wheel, 3x2 wheels & 1x3 wheels.


  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2005, 08:28 AM   #2
Hywel Jenkins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

In article <3505f1F4h5q1pU1@individual.net>, the_mark@hotmail.com
says...
> I've just come across this
> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>
> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no problems.


From the FAQ:
When will the new go-one³ be available?

The manufacturing and developing company Beyss
plans the completion of a prototype in december
2001. After the test running and the tuning is
concluded, the production of go-one³ will start
in april 2002.

It must be Halfords by now.

--
Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
I do not eat quiche.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2005, 09:48 AM   #3
Tony Raven
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

Hywel Jenkins wrote:
>
> From the FAQ:
> When will the new go-one³ be available?
>
> The manufacturing and developing company Beyss
> plans the completion of a prototype in december
> 2001. After the test running and the tuning is
> concluded, the production of go-one³ will start
> in april 2002.
>
> It must be Halfords by now.
>


Have to settle for one of these instead.
http://www.tripendo.com/EDEFAULT.htm

Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2005, 04:41 PM   #4
Tosspot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

the.Mark wrote:

> I've just come across this
> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>
> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no problems.


9,500 euro! Get an Anthrotech and a large condom :-o
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-01.-2005, 08:53 PM   #5
Dave Larrington
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

Tony Raven wrote:

> Have to settle for one of these instead.
> http://www.tripendo.com/EDEFAULT.htm


Have you seen how much that thing weighs? Just say "no", kids...

--

Dave Larrington - http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/
World Domination?
Just find a world that's into that kind of thing, then chain to the
floor and walk up and down on it in high heels. (Mr. Sunshine)


  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01.-2005, 05:59 AM   #6
Mark McNeill
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

Response to the.Mark:
> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean quite far
> over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.
>


In the past I've wondered how fully-faired trikes manage with sharp/fast
bends. My commute home includes an excitingly sharp left at the bottom
of a hill, and (assuming traffic conditions allow me to take it at
speed) I can choose to lean pretty damn hard, or briefly (or not so
briefly) lift a wheel. Both options have an element of fun...

--
Mark, UK.
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01.-2005, 07:22 AM   #7
Simon Brooke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

in message <3505f1F4h5q1pU1@individual.net>, the.Mark
('the_mark@hotmail.com') wrote:

> I've just come across this
> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>
> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no
> problems.


Yes, very nice. I sort of started a draft of a business plan around a
similar concept, here:

<URL:http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/tmp/velociraptor/>

Note that I now believe the costings in this document are extremely
unrealistic. Still if it inspires anybody, feel free to use any of the
ideas, or plagiarise as you think fit.

--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

---===***<<< This space to let! >>>***===---
Yes! You, too, can SPAM in the Famous Brooke Rotating .sig!
---===***<<< Only $300 per line >>>***===---
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01.-2005, 10:22 AM   #8
Jon Senior
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

the.Mark wrote:
> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean quite far
> over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.


My first experience of a recumbent trike was a Kettweisel, where leaning
was an absolute necessity otherwise a wheel lifted (Possibly an aspect
of the delta layout).

I then rode a Windcheetah, but as it belonged to a "real person", rather
than a shop, I didn't really feel it was right to push it too far. I've
since ridden a selection of Trices. My experience of those Trices
(Trici?) I rode was that the leaning wasn't any where near as necessary.
It was more to help me stay in a sensible place than to keep the wheels
down. I didn't manage to lift a wheel on the Micro at all, and I through
that round some pretty sharp bends at a fair bit faster than I had
intended! ;-)

I think that the solution is to get the CoG below the axle height of the
front wheels (Assuming they are the smallest).

Jon
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-01.-2005, 04:46 PM   #9
Tosspot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

Jon Senior wrote:

> the.Mark wrote:
>
>> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean
>> quite far over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.

>
>
> My first experience of a recumbent trike was a Kettweisel, where leaning
> was an absolute necessity otherwise a wheel lifted (Possibly an aspect
> of the delta layout).
>
> I then rode a Windcheetah, but as it belonged to a "real person", rather
> than a shop, I didn't really feel it was right to push it too far. I've
> since ridden a selection of Trices. My experience of those Trices
> (Trici?) I rode was that the leaning wasn't any where near as necessary.
> It was more to help me stay in a sensible place than to keep the wheels
> down. I didn't manage to lift a wheel on the Micro at all, and I through
> that round some pretty sharp bends at a fair bit faster than I had
> intended! ;-)
>
> I think that the solution is to get the CoG below the axle height of the
> front wheels (Assuming they are the smallest).


I ride an Anthrotech on two wheels :-o I dont think the 'tadpole'
format helps either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:25 AM   #10
Alan Braggins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

In article <1106007305.62736.0@demeter.uk.clara.net>, Jon Senior wrote:
>the.Mark wrote:
>> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean quite far
>> over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.

>

[...]
>
>I think that the solution is to get the CoG below the axle height of the
> front wheels (Assuming they are the smallest).


You could make the whole trike lean:
http://www.tripendo.com/EDEFAULT.htm
http://www.maxmatic.com/soohoo.htm

Making such a design work while enclosed by an efficient fairing is left as
an exercise for the reader.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:25 AM   #11
Alan Braggins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

In article <1106007305.62736.0@demeter.uk.clara.net>, Jon Senior wrote:
>the.Mark wrote:
>> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean quite far
>> over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.

>

[...]
>
>I think that the solution is to get the CoG below the axle height of the
> front wheels (Assuming they are the smallest).


You could make the whole trike lean:
http://www.tripendo.com/EDEFAULT.htm
http://www.maxmatic.com/soohoo.htm

Making such a design work while enclosed by an efficient fairing is left as
an exercise for the reader.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:25 AM   #12
Alan Braggins
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements

In article <1106007305.62736.0@demeter.uk.clara.net>, Jon Senior wrote:
>the.Mark wrote:
>> When I corner at moderate speeds on the windcheetah I have to lean quite far
>> over. If I had to do the same in a Go-one I'd bump my head.

>

[...]
>
>I think that the solution is to get the CoG below the axle height of the
> front wheels (Assuming they are the smallest).


You could make the whole trike lean:
http://www.tripendo.com/EDEFAULT.htm
http://www.maxmatic.com/soohoo.htm

Making such a design work while enclosed by an efficient fairing is left as
an exercise for the reader.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:36 AM   #13
Mark van Gorkom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements


>> I've just come across this
>> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>>
>> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no
>> problems.


I've heard of several velomobiles (Quests mostly) that got bowled over
in gale-force winds.
>
>Yes, very nice. I sort of started a draft of a business plan around a
>similar concept, here:
>
><URL:http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/tmp/velociraptor/>
>

Must admit I've only skipped through the text, but I'm not entirely
convinced a monocoque can be build lighter than a frame-and-fairing;
the Trisled Sorcerer ( http://www.trisled.com.au/sorcerer.htm ) is 5
kgs lighter than the Go-one (if their respective websites are to be
believed) and most monocoques are another 5-10kgs heavier.

Mark van Gorkom.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:36 AM   #14
Mark van Gorkom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements


>> I've just come across this
>> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>>
>> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no
>> problems.


I've heard of several velomobiles (Quests mostly) that got bowled over
in gale-force winds.
>
>Yes, very nice. I sort of started a draft of a business plan around a
>similar concept, here:
>
><URL:http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/tmp/velociraptor/>
>

Must admit I've only skipped through the text, but I'm not entirely
convinced a monocoque can be build lighter than a frame-and-fairing;
the Trisled Sorcerer ( http://www.trisled.com.au/sorcerer.htm ) is 5
kgs lighter than the Go-one (if their respective websites are to be
believed) and most monocoques are another 5-10kgs heavier.

Mark van Gorkom.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01.-2005, 01:36 AM   #15
Mark van Gorkom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Protection from the elements


>> I've just come across this
>> http://www.go-one.de/ukindex.shtml
>>
>> I'd love a go on one, I'm sure the recent winds would cause it no
>> problems.


I've heard of several velomobiles (Quests mostly) that got bowled over
in gale-force winds.
>
>Yes, very nice. I sort of started a draft of a business plan around a
>similar concept, here:
>
><URL:http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/tmp/velociraptor/>
>

Must admit I've only skipped through the text, but I'm not entirely
convinced a monocoque can be build lighter than a frame-and-fairing;
the Trisled Sorcerer ( http://www.trisled.com.au/sorcerer.htm ) is 5
kgs lighter than the Go-one (if their respective websites are to be
believed) and most monocoques are another 5-10kgs heavier.

Mark van Gorkom.
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com