![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
njf>badger< wrote:
> > Richard Bates wrote: > >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the road > is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which scale > on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register someone else > on the road. Nah, that's part of the so-called 'safespeed' perpetual argument against speed cameras, and it's a lot of tosh. As someone else said, the only significant change is the one from 60mph to 80kph. Anyone who is capable of receiving clue should quickly be able to adjust. It shouldn't take more than one or two glances at the speedo at first encounter with the 80kph limit to determine what it 'looks like' as you pass through your surroundings. After that you look at your surroundings and drive by 'feel'. I drove my last car for about three years without any speedo at all as it was broken when I bought it, and never got a ticket, nor held anyone up worrying about whether I might not be going over, including occasionally driving past the inevitable speed cameras. It's not difficult to get a 'feel' for speed and take your clues from the surroundings. Rich |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
njf>badger< wrote:
> > Richard Bates wrote: > >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the road > is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which scale > on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register someone else > on the road. Nah, that's part of the so-called 'safespeed' perpetual argument against speed cameras, and it's a lot of tosh. As someone else said, the only significant change is the one from 60mph to 80kph. Anyone who is capable of receiving clue should quickly be able to adjust. It shouldn't take more than one or two glances at the speedo at first encounter with the 80kph limit to determine what it 'looks like' as you pass through your surroundings. After that you look at your surroundings and drive by 'feel'. I drove my last car for about three years without any speedo at all as it was broken when I bought it, and never got a ticket, nor held anyone up worrying about whether I might not be going over, including occasionally driving past the inevitable speed cameras. It's not difficult to get a 'feel' for speed and take your clues from the surroundings. Rich |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
njf>badger< wrote:
> > Richard Bates wrote: > >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the road > is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which scale > on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register someone else > on the road. Nah, that's part of the so-called 'safespeed' perpetual argument against speed cameras, and it's a lot of tosh. As someone else said, the only significant change is the one from 60mph to 80kph. Anyone who is capable of receiving clue should quickly be able to adjust. It shouldn't take more than one or two glances at the speedo at first encounter with the 80kph limit to determine what it 'looks like' as you pass through your surroundings. After that you look at your surroundings and drive by 'feel'. I drove my last car for about three years without any speedo at all as it was broken when I bought it, and never got a ticket, nor held anyone up worrying about whether I might not be going over, including occasionally driving past the inevitable speed cameras. It's not difficult to get a 'feel' for speed and take your clues from the surroundings. Rich |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Richard Bates wrote:
> >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the > road is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which > scale on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register > someone else on the road. Of course, this is in a country were speed cameras are very rare, penalty points less than 2 years old, and you only get two points out of twelve for drink driving. So there's not a huge worry in drivers about being caught speeding. A |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Richard Bates wrote:
> >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the > road is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which > scale on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register > someone else on the road. Of course, this is in a country were speed cameras are very rare, penalty points less than 2 years old, and you only get two points out of twelve for drink driving. So there's not a huge worry in drivers about being caught speeding. A |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Richard Bates wrote:
> >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the > road is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which > scale on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register > someone else on the road. Of course, this is in a country were speed cameras are very rare, penalty points less than 2 years old, and you only get two points out of twelve for drink driving. So there's not a huge worry in drivers about being caught speeding. A |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> Richard Bates wrote:
> >> Heard on Radio Four this moring that ROI has now converted all speed >> limit signs to Km/h. >> >> He also said that drivers would need to look at the speedometer more >> often. >> >> Excellent, I say. > > Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check > the speed against the new limits whilst driving. Driver awareness is > bad enough at the best of times, but each look down away from the > road is bad enough, let alone trying to work out which point on which > scale on a speedo as well, means more time to miss and register > someone else on the road. Of course, this is in a country were speed cameras are very rare, penalty points less than 2 years old, and you only get two points out of twelve for drink driving. So there's not a huge worry in drivers about being caught speeding. A |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Clinch wrote: > njf>badger< wrote: > >> Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check >> the speed against the new limits whilst driving. > > > This wouldn't be a problem if more people didn't regard limits as > targets to sit at... True, but then going just gets in the way of the buses/trucks trying to keep to timetable/make a living.... > As it is, in the longer term the speeds should (/if/ enforced) come > down, plus it possibly brings forward the day when Britain joins the > rest of the civilized world in having a single measurement system in use. > > Pete. Do I detect an old alliance connection here? Niel ;-) |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Clinch wrote: > njf>badger< wrote: > >> Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check >> the speed against the new limits whilst driving. > > > This wouldn't be a problem if more people didn't regard limits as > targets to sit at... True, but then going just gets in the way of the buses/trucks trying to keep to timetable/make a living.... > As it is, in the longer term the speeds should (/if/ enforced) come > down, plus it possibly brings forward the day when Britain joins the > rest of the civilized world in having a single measurement system in use. > > Pete. Do I detect an old alliance connection here? Niel ;-) |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Clinch wrote: > njf>badger< wrote: > >> Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check >> the speed against the new limits whilst driving. > > > This wouldn't be a problem if more people didn't regard limits as > targets to sit at... True, but then going just gets in the way of the buses/trucks trying to keep to timetable/make a living.... > As it is, in the longer term the speeds should (/if/ enforced) come > down, plus it possibly brings forward the day when Britain joins the > rest of the civilized world in having a single measurement system in use. > > Pete. Do I detect an old alliance connection here? Niel ;-) |
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Peter Clinch wrote: > njf>badger< wrote: > >> Humm, a disaster more likely, looking at a speedo and trying to check >> the speed against the new limits whilst driving. > > > This wouldn't be a problem if more people didn't regard limits as > targets to sit at... True, but then going just gets in the way of the buses/trucks trying to keep to timetable/make a living.... > As it is, in the longer term the speeds should (/if/ enforced) come > down, plus it possibly brings forward the day when Britain joins the > rest of the civilized world in having a single measurement system in use. > > Pete. Do I detect an old alliance connection here? Niel ;-) |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Scrumpy Joe wrote:
> > And most people know that the roads they travel on can be travelled faster > than the posted speed limit. Just because it's the posted limit it doesn't > mean that it suddenly becomes dangerous at 10 mph more. As far as speed > limits being seen as a target go; I never came across a driving instructor > that didn't expect you to hit that 'target' in as short a time as possible. I don't know about now but many moons ago when I took my test you could fail for going too slowly. Failing to make adequate progress I think they called it. Tony |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Scrumpy Joe wrote:
> > And most people know that the roads they travel on can be travelled faster > than the posted speed limit. Just because it's the posted limit it doesn't > mean that it suddenly becomes dangerous at 10 mph more. As far as speed > limits being seen as a target go; I never came across a driving instructor > that didn't expect you to hit that 'target' in as short a time as possible. I don't know about now but many moons ago when I took my test you could fail for going too slowly. Failing to make adequate progress I think they called it. Tony |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:41:57 +0000, Scrumpy Joe <spamcop@spamcop.net>
wrote: >And most people know that the roads they travel on can be travelled faster >than the posted speed limit. Just because it's the posted limit it doesn't >mean that it suddenly becomes dangerous at 10 mph more. Correct - it becomes logarithmically more dangerous as you approach 10 mph more. -- Amazon: "If you are interested in 'Asimov's I-Robot', you may also be interested in 'Garfield - The Movie'. ... erm, how do they figure that one out? |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:41:57 +0000, Scrumpy Joe <spamcop@spamcop.net>
wrote: >And most people know that the roads they travel on can be travelled faster >than the posted speed limit. Just because it's the posted limit it doesn't >mean that it suddenly becomes dangerous at 10 mph more. Correct - it becomes logarithmically more dangerous as you approach 10 mph more. -- Amazon: "If you are interested in 'Asimov's I-Robot', you may also be interested in 'Garfield - The Movie'. ... erm, how do they figure that one out? |
|