Page 4 - Calling Out Flyer

05-04.-2005, 05:45 AM	#46
House Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 860	Re: Calling Out Flyer Again, no real responses, just more of the same things posted over and over by the joke of the forum.

05-04.-2005, 09:02 AM	#48
House Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 860	Re: Calling Out Flyer What do you know, flyer reposts the same thing because he did not get enough attention. What a joke.

05-04.-2005, 10:06 AM	#50
House Banned Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 860	Re: Calling Out Flyer Three posts in a row, the same thing. I am getting bored with you, you have proven everything i said about you is true. Have fun with your mental masterbation.

05-04.-2005, 10:16 AM	#51
wolfix Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: "Still in 1975" Posts: 2,634	Re: Calling Out Flyer http://www.laf.org/ Check this out concerning all you "NEED" to know about Lance armstrong ......

05-04.-2005, 03:52 PM

#53

wolfix

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2005

Location: "Still in 1975"

Posts: 2,634

Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolfix

http://www.laf.org/

Check this out concerning all you "NEED" to know about Lance armstrong ......

I think everyone would want to read this concerning Lance Armstrong too ..... http://www.sherylcrow.com/news.asp?newsID=13379

22-04.-2005, 03:18 AM

#55

tas1978

Registered User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 36

Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flyer

Naming names.

I may never name specific names directly. If I did,several things will happen---all bad. I may name some names, indirectly. There is so much doping (at 100%) obviously, I will end up naming a name that I do know personally. It is impossible not to. But I will not confirm it becasue:

1) You won't believe me when I name the specific folks---many names you would recognize. But you'll deny it, calling it 'a jealous lie' or a 'cowardly act'.

2) I would put these folks in a direct conflict with their employers and industry peers.

3) Some of the names will publicly deny their private doping remarks----as they would have financial adverse consequences if they confirmed them.

Flyer, I believe that the quote above is true. This leads me to some questions: Since you won't name names because of your reasons #s 2 and 3, does that make you an enabler? Are you not feeding the money hungry dope machine by keeping these names private? Wouldn't some one who is really apposed to doping in the sport blow the whistle? After all of your posts in this forum, we find out that you actually support doping in you own way? Why do you make it easier fot these people to make their money in this dirty industry by not calling them out?

22-04.-2005, 03:20 AM

#56

House

Banned

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 860

Re: Calling Out Flyer

Quote:

Originally Posted by tas1978

Excellent point. Go read through some of his archive and you soon realise that by using his idea of "proof" of doping that he would be a doper himself. It's quite amusing. Any bet he makes some little comment then just reposts one of the same five posts he uses over and over?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode