Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Tyler Innocent?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-04.-2005, 10:41 AM   #48
wilmar13
Registered User
 
wilmar13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,557
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer

I believe they are all flat wrong about this. And these guys are dropping dead like flys--every 60 days! They get sick first (cancer, bi-polar, high blood pressure), then die prematurely.

Here are a few names of former patients:

Panatani, Zanette --Conconi's work

Give it another ten years----then we will see!


Yeah, but people in the general population develop cancer, HBP, Depression, etc., Pantani died of a coke overdose, that has nothing to do with doping in this context. I don't know anything about Zanette. I don't think you will find many people that say Pro Cyclists aren't trying to gain an advantage in any way possible, but to say it is killing them and they are gladiators... well I guess it will take ten years to find out.
wilmar13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 11:16 AM   #49
davidbod
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 712
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

We can pick this apart till the end of time here, but we were not at the hearing and we did not hear all of the evidence. Three individuals charged with hearing the evidence and rendering a decision did, and they could not agree on his guilt or innocence. And what if next time this test finds someone guilty and the decision is 2 to 1 in favor of the cyclist, what then.
davidbod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 08:35 PM   #52
wilmar13
Registered User
 
wilmar13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,557
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
If you don't know about Zanetti then you have really shown off your true colors. A profound lack of knowledge on doping, mortality and addiction consequences. Please do not assume these Galdiators are as healthy as the general population---they are not!



If I ever wrote anything where I came across as a self-professed doping aficionado, I was in error. I am a guy that likes to ride and race bicycles at a terminal Cat 3 level. I also like to casually follow professional road racing. That is it, don't let my complaining about the many thread hijacks and troll-like posts confuse the issue. BTW, this is a good thread to get it all out of your system, as it is both applicable to road racing, and the topic of the thread. If you keep your opinions in threads like this all is good.
wilmar13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 09:12 PM   #53
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
The fans are plenty to blame as well. Especially those who ignore shreds of doping evidence. More sad revelations are due for those clinging on to the false belief that somehow, their hero is 'clean'. Whatever clean means anymore.

Hero worship and crazy personal projections of qualities these riders simply do not possess.

Work ethic, nice personalities?

These are Gladitors, NOT CYCLISTS.

Amateur cyclists do not use drugs or trauma sports medicine protocols. Of course, amateur cyclists do not appear in the Tour de France either. Elite sport is hyper competitive, and once a doper---always a liar. Such is the disease of addiction.

Whether Tyler has a cute dog named tugboat or an evil rat for a pet--it makes ZERO difference. If you want professional cycling results, you will use drugs and blood boosting methods or you will retire.

This is true whether your first name is David, Tyler, Alex, Richard, Oscar, Danilo, or Lance.

This was yet another wake up call in a long series.

Or you can just hit the snooze buttom and go back to dreamland.


Very well said Flyer. I have to agree. I was reading through this thread with replies from folks condemning Hamilton as a convicted cheater while evidently still believing their favorite rider or riders to be clean (I won't name any names). I couldn't help but think how naive they are.

As far as Hamilton, who a lot of folks once believed to be a great guy and whom these same folks are now condemning as a cheating scoundrel; all I can say is these people should realize that TH simply fell victim to the temptaion that every top professional cyclist must face. Do "what it takes" to succeed or go home. Let's not confuse dope cheats with real criminals. If you think Tyler is an anomaly in the pro cycling peloton, you really do need to wake-up. The difference is that Tyler didn't play the game as well as some of his competitors and he got caught.
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 09:18 PM   #54
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hombredesubaru
How do you explain an extortionist who called Phonak demanding a bribe and predicted that Perez and Hamilton would turn positive, BEFORE Athens and Vuelta tests?


Ummm, yeah. Sounds like an "urban legend" to me. Can you site your source for that bit of information?
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 09:55 PM   #55
James Felstead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 71
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by meehs
I was reading through this thread with replies from folks condemning Hamilton as a convicted cheater while evidently still believing their favorite rider or riders to be clean (I won't name any names). I couldn't help but think how naive they are.


As one of the few people who's used that phrase in this thread I can only assume the comment is directed at me?

If you think I'm drifting around in some self deluded haze whereby I think Hamilton is some outrageous criminal cheating a predominantly clean competing peleton I think you're grossly mistaken.
James Felstead is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 10:38 PM   #56
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,575
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

I think some perspective needs to be introduced here.

TH did cheat and was found to have cheated.

In absolute terms, what does the TH case tell us ?

It tells us that he did cheat.
It doesn't tell us why he cheated nor does it address the reason as to why TH decided to cheat.
These issues are the ones which I think, Flyer is attempting to address.

While it is right to condemn TH for the act of cheating, I think that to condemn him and his character for ever more, in a human context, is ridiculous and unfair.

Finally, it is worth re-iterating that all of the platitudes, all of the fervour to
smash drugs/doping, in the aftermath of Festina (1998), Pantani's death (2003) and all instances in between, have failed.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 10:42 PM   #57
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Felstead
As one of the few people who's used that phrase in this thread I can only assume the comment is directed at me?

If you think I'm drifting around in some self deluded haze whereby I think Hamilton is some outrageous criminal cheating a predominantly clean competing peleton I think you're grossly mistaken.


When I said "I won't name names" I was actually referring to names of cyclists that people are presuming to be clean not names of forum members. I didn't mean to point to any particular post or poster.That said it certainly seems as though some folks here believe their heros to be clean while the few pros that actually happen to get busted are scoundrel dope cheats. Which is absolutely ridiculous.
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 10:48 PM   #58
James Felstead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 71
Wink Re: Tyler Innocent?

that's alright then - don't want to get the wrong reputation
James Felstead is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 10:53 PM   #59
meehs
Registered User
 
meehs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 1,848
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
While it is right to condemn TH for the act of cheating, I think that to condemn him and his character for ever more, in a human context, is ridiculous and unfair.


I agee with you that it's not right to condemn TH and his character in a "human" context. That's what I was getting at.

But I have a tough time really condemning a cyclist for "cheating" in a sport where pretty much every top competitor is quite likely doing the same thing. I know it might sound silly. But is a cheat among cheats really a cheater? The whole sport is corrupt and in my opinion pointing to the few riders who happen to get caught and saying "Oh! Cheater! Doper! You're a cheater!" is absolutly absurd! Until the sport is cleaned-up, these riders are just the unfortunate few who happen to get caught. I'm not saying we should look the other way and do nothing. I'm not sure what can be done. But to condemn the ones who happen to get caught as cheaters is like going into a maximum security prison and pointing to an individual inmate and saying "Oh! You're a bad person! You're a criminal"!
meehs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-04.-2005, 11:07 PM   #60
James Felstead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 71
Default Re: Tyler Innocent?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Finally, it is worth re-iterating that all of the platitudes, all of the fervour to
smash drugs/doping, in the aftermath of Festina (1998), Pantani's death (2003) and all instances in between, have failed.


Indeed they have failed - and judging by many of the views expressed on this forum is that any surprise?

Even with a guilty verdict handed down it seems there are a stack of people out there who don't want to accept it. Quick to doubt any medical test but happy to back a rider based on nothing more than faith (despite the many historical cases that prove riders claims of innocence to be nothing but lies). This level of denial is quite an obsticle.

This is what i find so frustrating about the whole doping issue - it clearly damages the sport on a fundamental level but there seems to be limited appetite to geniunely tackle the problem - on many many levels - from governing bodies, teams, riders to armchair supporters.

The problem is I'm not one of those who can simply say 'that's just the way it is' and carry like it's all okay. Ho hum


what can you do?
James Felstead is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet