![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#136 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
I will end this particular post with this observation. I've been riding on and off for about ten years with most of my riding being on a cheap, heavy, low tech, mountain bike with combination tires. I used to come in contact often with road bikers and or racing clubs on my rides. The majority of which had expensive rides with apparently every gadget available. (I’m currently riding a carbon fiber bike with top of the line components so I’m not just pissed that I can’t afford nice equipment.) Here's my observation. 90 + percent of the time I passed these guys up and stayed ahead for the duration. This was on flats as well as hills and mountains. I say this not to boast but to make a point. That point, or maybe I should pose it as a question, it this. Are we (myself included) spending too much energy (and money) on technology and not enough on just plain enjoying the ride? Just a question/observation. Don't write me an angry letter because you just spent thousands on Power Monitoring equipment please. Remember I said earlier that I might just be the type to do the exact same thing. P.S. Maybe this is a better question. How do you know when you’re crossing the line between enjoyment of the sport and just wanting all the latest technology? P.S. # 2 I've read several more posts since writing this original. I know that it appears that I'm oversimplifying the argument/s. That has its purpose. I've found that keeping ANYTHING you do as simple as is possible to be the best plan of attack. Maybe a power meter is your way of achieving this. (See, I'm not against them) This even applies to something as complex as computer programming. The more I'm able to approach a problem by simplifying it the better luck I have with it’s operation. Of course these are just my opinions and you know what they say of opinions. They’re like a certain sphincter, and everyone has one. Last edited by NORECUMYET : 30-07.-2007 at 11:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
Some of us enjoy the sport most when we're winning races. A PM and a good Plan is a great way for us to get more enjoyment . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#139 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
I'm extremely mechanically adept so I completely understand what is being measured here that isn't directly and exactly being measured in other ways. What I wonder is this. Is it possible to get virtually the same information from a couple of other sources? I.E., CADENCE, MPH or KPH, %GRADE, and HEART RATE. I'm confused that's all. Don't get ANGRY I may just be uninformed. Is this yet another electronic device that's going to cost 1/10 of today's cost within the next eighteen months? Believe me, if I become convinced that a power meter will give me the ability to improve my performance in ways that what I already have CAN NOT, I'll be out there hunting down the best deal as soon as possible. Maybe someone could give me an overview of exactly how one of these things can give me information that I can use to improve my performance in ways that the measurements I mention above simply can not give me. And for all you that already have them and are now winning races that you could not of won before, CONGRATULATIONS! You should be proud of yourselves. I just don't get it yet that's all. I'm not trying to bust anyone's huevos as much as doing just that is usually entertaining. It's just that I already know how many RPM my pedals have to turn to go a certain speed and I know that everyone is different and I know that I need to continually go faster than I am now and that means faster cadence for the most part. Experiance and the data I now collect tells me how far I went, the average speed, cadence, MPH, heartrate, as well as the maximums and minimums of the same, how many feet I climbed, how many I descend, devided by distance, time, location etc. along with many others that I just can't remember off hand. You mean with all that information I still need to know the exact torque I'm producing too? I'm overwhelmed. Or is it that once I can measure my torque and how fast that propels me that I won't need all the other stuff? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#140 | ||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
If you know all the appropriate data you can use this or this (amongst others). Quote:
If you check ebay you'll see that most PM's hold their value quite well. The past is no predictor of the future however... Quote:
Try CyclingPeaks site. There's a wealth of information on the benefits of PM usage there. Quote:
The other "stuff" you are referring to is very dependent upon many variables (weather conditions, hydration, altitude, and such). Power (torque*angular velocity) is independent of all those variables. Again, I encourage you to check out the CyclingPeaks site and to search this forum. There's much information on the benefits of PM's to be gleaned there. Dave |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#141 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 12
|
No need to spend all that money - go check this site: http://www.peakscoachinggroup.com/p...power_book.html
get the book (a LOT less than a new or used PM ) and that should help you out!The second thing you are going to ask is: do I really need WKO+ ![]() So - decide for yourself: http://cyclingpeakssoftware.com Happy reading... |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
No fangs intended at all. That was just my "funny" way of pointing out that whether or not you could/should use a powermeter is really dependent on your goals. If I wasn't interested in racing, I probably wouldn't even have a regular cycling computer on my bike. Quote:
Yep, that's pretty much it. Buy the book (I even have an autographed copy myself) and check this out while you're waiting for it to arrive: http://midweekclub.ca/powerFAQ.htm |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#143 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
|
Good compilation of resources (many, if not most, free) here:
http://www.freewebs.com/trainwithpower/resources.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
#144 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
I think the best bet for me is to get myself the book recommended to me. If it turns out that a power meter can help me to attain things I might not be able to without one then I'll go for it. Thanks again for all the advice. So far I haven't been concerned with racing. Other than the informal type that happens out on the street or bike paths that is. Who knows though? I always have been probably more competitive than the average person. I may end being a huge supporter of power meters when all is said and done. Last edited by NORECUMYET : 02-08.-2007 at 01:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|