Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Dauphine thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13-06.-2005, 05:58 AM   #121
MJtje
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,125
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Or levi just needs to admit that Gerolsteiner DOESN't have the team to bring the break back! Without the help of DC and Phonak the gap would have been even bigger.......so Levi lacks a team for GC!



Quote:
Originally Posted by hombredesubaru
Levi agrees with you, but hey, what are the directeurs sportif doing?, with their radios, and their computers in the car with files and times on each rider...I mean if the break was a problem it is up to them to tell Levi pull it back BEFORE the gap gets to like 9 minutes.

Landaluze alomst won a stage last year in the tour, he came in tenth last year at Dauphine, and was eighth up Ventoux this year. What were they thinking?!?

I mean Levi can SAY the Dauphine is a tune up for the tour, but he will not podium (unlike Lance when he says it is just a tune up for the tour). D-Libere would have by far been Levi's biggest win in his career. Too bad.
MJtje is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 08:53 AM   #122
whiteboytrash
Registered User
 
whiteboytrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,161
Default Re: Dauphine thread

I agree Lance can use the Dauphine as a tune-up as he has won it before and won 6 Tours... whereas Levi should of kept things in control and not expecting T-Mobile or Disco to make the chase.... schoolboy error !

Quote:
Originally Posted by hombredesubaru
Levi agrees with you, but hey, what are the directeurs sportif doing?, with their radios, and their computers in the car with files and times on each rider...I mean if the break was a problem it is up to them to tell Levi pull it back BEFORE the gap gets to like 9 minutes.

Landaluze alomst won a stage last year in the tour, he came in tenth last year at Dauphine, and was eighth up Ventoux this year. What were they thinking?!?

I mean Levi can SAY the Dauphine is a tune up for the tour, but he will not podium (unlike Lance when he says it is just a tune up for the tour). D-Libere would have by far been Levi's biggest win in his career. Too bad.
whiteboytrash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 03:57 PM   #123
mitosis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: east coast australia
Posts: 1,447
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eldrack
Would be a pity to see Landaluze loose the race on the last stage, he made a good break, rode a good time up Ventoux and did well yesterday with only three team mates, he deserves to win.
And on a completely different note, what the hell has happened to LA's poker face? All the pictures of him on the up hill have him pulling a pained face. I though he tried to keep his face blank to get at his opponents?


In 2000 T de F he pretended to be hurting for most of a stage before he went hard on the final climb. Great tactic but it probably only works once.

Last edited by mitosis : 13-06.-2005 at 04:03 PM.
mitosis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 04:44 PM   #124
Eldrack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,065
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Seems like Discovery were the only team strong enough to control the peloton. Look how long Hincapie and Popo stayed out infront of the peloton. Phonak should have closed that gap to keep the team classification but they couldn't. Good news for Discovery on the Tour.
Eldrack is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 05:57 PM   #125
whiteboytrash
Registered User
 
whiteboytrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,161
Default Re: Dauphine thread

That was 2001......

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitosis
In 2000 T de F he pretended to be hurting for most of a stage before he went hard on the final climb. Great tactic but it probably only works once.
whiteboytrash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 06:38 PM   #126
yace
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hong Kong & Beijing, China
Posts: 17
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboytrash
That was 2001......
yep, the alpe d'Huez stage.
in Chinese, we call that "Kong Cheng Ji"
yace is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 06:41 PM   #127
mitosis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: east coast australia
Posts: 1,447
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by whiteboytrash
That was 2001......

Sorry, I was going from memory.
mitosis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 06:56 PM   #128
whiteboytrash
Registered User
 
whiteboytrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,161
Default Re: Dauphine thread

I was there the day it happened.... we were in a bar on the l'Aple watching the race…. It was in French so I could not understand the commentary.... we all keep saying he was gone... the French guys in the bar kept cheering every time the camera panned to the pained expressions on his face... we all thought he was gone..... and then BOOOOMMMMM !! He was off... made Ullrich look stupid.... we all ran out of the bar when Armstrong powered past us up the mountain and cheered him on (with beers in hand !)...... O'Grady wore yellow that day and to commentate such a great stage and a marvellous victory by Armstrong I framed the front page of l'Equipe from the following day which has a great photos of Armstrong on the attack and Ullrich in the background in the German jersey with his head down in a world of hurt (psychologically and physically).... when ever people drop by they always ask me about the framed picture... so I tell the story.... ‘well in 2001…..’

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitosis
Sorry, I was going from memory.
whiteboytrash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 11:45 PM   #129
musette
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Gerolsteiner does have the team to just barely control the peloton, if they brought their TdF team. But they will have the issue of two co-leaders in G Totsching and L Leipheimer, and neither really wanting to work for the other. If one of them lost a lot of time and had to work for the other (a la Cunego/Simoni this year in the Giro), the remaining leader would be better off. But neither is likely to lose that much time to the other, barring an accident.

The Dauphine strategic mistakes made by Gerolsteiner, TM and Phonak were bred out of a sense of dependence on DC's control of the peloton. What LA and Bruyneel did were to make these other teams realize they have to work, if they want to do well in the Tour, lest yet other teams with breakaways would get too much of a lead. This may be Bruyneel beginning to plant the seeds for DC to work less in the Tour (although they will have to work very hard, obviously). By putting GH and Popo on a solo breakway and by LA telling people that he would not mind letting Popo win the TdF if Popo gained time in a breakaway, LA and Bruyneel are also setting up the possibility of Popo being a stronger stategic pawn in LA's road to his GC win in the Tour.
musette is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 12:41 AM   #130
whiteboytrash
Registered User
 
whiteboytrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,161
Default Re: Dauphine thread

Huh ? Why did TM have to chase ? Why is that a strategic mistake and for Disco its a masterstroke ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by musette
Gerolsteiner does have the team to just barely control the peloton, ......
The Dauphine strategic mistakes made by Gerolsteiner, TM and Phonak were bred out of a sense of dependence on DC's control of the peloton. What LA and Bruyneel did were to make these other teams realize they have to work, if they want to do well in the Tour, lest yet other teams with breakaways would get too much of a lead. This may be Bruyneel beginning to plant the seeds for DC to work less in the Tour (although they will have to work very hard, obviously). By putting GH and Popo on a solo breakway and by LA telling people that he would not mind letting Popo win the TdF if Popo gained time in a breakaway, LA and Bruyneel are also setting up the possibility of Popo being a stronger stategic pawn in LA's road to his GC win in the Tour.
whiteboytrash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 02:47 AM   #131
musette
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,405
Default Re: Dauphine thread

It was a strategic mistake for Gerolsteiner because LL had hopes of winning GC. Also, as the team of the then GC leader, they had a stronger obligation to chase. It was a strategic mistake for TM and Phonak, if they were hoping that Vino or Botero/Landis would have a shot at the win.

It was not a strategic mistake for DC because it was a choice on the part of DC.
musette is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 02:56 AM   #132
whiteboytrash
Registered User
 
whiteboytrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,161
Default Re: Dauphine thread

I agree with you on Gerolsteiner but Vino said that ‘overall’ was not an objective so TM didn’t need to chase..... maybe TM had the masterstroke as DC looked at them thinking that would force TM to chase and they just looked back at DC... it depends on what angle you look at it from…. Only Botero and Levi openly said they wanted to win the thing……

Quote:
Originally Posted by musette
It was a strategic mistake for Gerolsteiner because LL had hopes of winning GC. Also, as the team of the then GC leader, they had a stronger obligation to chase. It was a strategic mistake for TM and Phonak, if they were hoping that Vino or Botero/Landis would have a shot at the win.

It was not a strategic mistake for DC because it was a choice on the part of DC.
whiteboytrash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 07:27 PM   #133
Eldrack
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,065
Default Re: Dauphine thread

DC and TM are playing poker with each other at the moment in the build up to the tour de France so its pretty hard to tell whether they actually wanted to win the race at all.Gerolstiner and Phonak on the other hand did screw up because they have riders who wanted to win the race but didn't because their teams didn't control Landaluze's breakaway.
Eldrack is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet