Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Doping
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


The clients of Michele Ferrari

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-06.-2005, 10:50 PM   #17
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

That there is a doping problem in cycling and in all sports there is no question. I am glad I am not on trial however with you as the judge. Your guilt by association doctrine would put all athletes on the guillotine. Once again I say a doping agent was never found in the blood or urine of Pantani the athlete. He developed a cocaine problem only after the merciless attacks of 1999. Cocaine is not a performance enhancer, and certainly Pantani had few great performances after 1999. I do not wish to enoble drug addiction, for the addict must always bear the lions share of responsability. However it is hard to find an athlete so chastised in all of sports. The raids of the 98 tour do not lessen the victory of Pantani, they exalt it. For the antidoping controllers were all over the riders. They had to be clean. With no one doping, the gap between Pantani and the mere mortals became blatantly obvious. That same Leblanc who begged Pantani to save and honor his tour, would then fail to invite him, when the false accusations and suspensions occurred. And yet in 2000 who was it who brought some interest to the tour (his last tour).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
No one mentioned Denis Zanetti---he died in 2003 and was David Rebellin's teammate at Liquigas.

Zanetti was a Conconi client at one time.

He was not as famous as Pantani---but died at age 32, two years younger than did Marco.

Marco Pantani is the most famous of the dead athletes-----but he is hardly a special case.

He was typical of many drug addicted athletes in many sports.

Look for many more similar stories.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06.-2005, 05:31 AM   #19
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

Ilpirata

The fundamental reason why no one was caught on a large scale in the 1998 TdF after the police moved in was the lack of a blood test for EPO (and Hgh). The police were looking for the tools of trade (syringes, etc) and stock (drugs).

You said: Naturally on appeal, the charges (against Pantani) are dropped because in 1995 there was no rule against high hematocrit, and it is was not a crime.

I understand that a lot of athletes in Italy were able to be acquitted of the charges of sporting fraud because the evidence of guilt related to periods before the law was introduced.

The law was not retrospective and it would have been unjust if it was made retrospective.

I believe this applied to Pantani's Hct level in 1995 and not the fact the UCI had not introduced the 50% health risk rule. EPO was certainly on the banned drug list in 1995 but there was no test to evidence its use in an athlete.
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06.-2005, 08:47 PM   #20
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

I read what you fellows write but I do not believe the opposite is true.
It is known exactly when Pantani developed a cocaine habit. (In the book "A man on the run" written by Manuela Ronchi and published a little over a year ago. It corresponds directly with the period of his career where there are no important results as a cyclist. The use of cocaine for performance enhancement would really be foolish don't you think? The fact that Pantani is acquitted because there is no law on the books to address the accusation, does not prove that he assumed epo. What kind of logic is that? What it does suggest is: Why were the charges brought to bear at all if not to harass and destroy the reputation and continued performance of the man? Like I say, he was removed for not bending over to the betting mafia and the power people. You know yourselves that PEDs are big buisiness. Soccer is big buisness. Betting is big buisiness. Who is this little guy who is taking fans out of stadiums, winning everything he enters. Coincidentally, if you students of doping would look a little deeper, instead of just falling into the "they all do it" position, You will see that when Pantani was in the limelight he was in the avantguard for fair and better testing for cyclists. With respect to the rest I admit some agreement, I believe myself that it is maybe impossible today to win a tdF without PEDs and multiple syringes following races to aid recovery. Also Italy does have their experts in PEDs, no question. But I will not let you guys get your extra kicks into the man who has already been kicked to his death, and is for me and for many the last great champion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Panatni did die at age 34 no? Is this the same non-doper to whom you refer?

Unfortunately, no one is judging sport/business other than the corporate advertisers. Thus toxic levels of doping and tragedies of Marco Pantani are doomed to repeat themselves over and over.

I could not disagree more re: Panatani tainted TDF victory. In that event a 'doping control truce' was fashioned by organizers in order to prevent more teams from abandoning---which they would have done.

Marco Pantani's surprise victory in the 1998 TDF would never have occured w/o the wholesale abandonment of 40% of the field and the commercial disaster (PR damage control) that ensued.

Festina, TVM, Once and riders such as Alex Zulle and Laurent Jalabert leaving or being arrested destroyed the competion.

Not since 1978 has a TDF yellow jersey contender been disqualified--and then only a 30 day suspension after Michel Pollentier's rubber bladder mechanism failed to deposit the clean urine of another.

The 1998 Tour de France results are tainted, badly.

That TDF should have been cancelled but because of the advertising refunds and permanent fallout, the 'show must go on mantra' ruled the day.

Pantani was as medicated in 1998 and he was at any other time in his career.

You better tell Gilberti Simoni about your cocaine awareness---he thinks it is a 'stimulant' and thus a performane enhancer. Especially, if your are exhausted.

Frank Vandenbrocke probably needs your insights too. As does David Millar and the entire pro peleton.

Cocaine may be less toxic than the Pot Belge that has been used for years--including in the 1998 TDF.

If it makes you feel better, Armstrong's TDF victories appear as tainted as Pantani's.

Same problem, different sponsored athlete.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-06.-2005, 10:38 PM   #22
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

Look Flyer, that Pantani died of drug overdose is of course fact without question. That he was seeking in fact death can be inferred. To say that he cheated as a competetive cyclist you are making quite an extrapolation. And you have not got your facts straight. He had no need of epo, that is for sure. Are Kenyans winning marathons because they load up on epo? I think they dominate because they are light, they train well and have high cardiovascular efficiency. Are you referring to famous insulin needle found in a hotel room that was vacated a day earlier and that there is no proof that Pantani ever slept in anyway and for which no DNA test was ever done? Well that is real evidence to rush to a conclusion! Charges are dropped (BIG SURPRISE) but the suspension was already served. You can quote all day the cyclists found or admitting to use of PEDs, that does not justify a condemnation of specific person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Next I suppose you will tell us when Marco first injected Human Growth hormones or what month/year he began insulin/glocuse rejuvenation.

Look, these people are all drug addicted personalities---in additional highly stressed athletes with job insecurity and advertising pressure for results.

When you combine these factors it is no surprise that so many cyclists, 1) get mysterious and vexing illnesses (Hincapie, Armstrong, Strock, Kaiter, Lemond, Trent Lowe, Millar, Clavelorent, Jeminez, etc...) 2) die by age 45, 3) develop cocaine habits.

Before you judge cocaine use as a PED, consider the abuse of Pot Belge (Heroin, Morphine, corticosteroids and Cocaine) as a PED. Insofar as foolishness? Madness is a better word.

If Willy Voet had not been jacked up on this junk in 1998 we would not have enjoyed the Lille Trials in October 2000, not Marco Panani's TDF victory.

Without the 1998 TDF doping scandal Pantani would not have won that race.

He couldn't time trial and could not sprint. He required steep and long Mountains, heavy rain, mechanical trouble and bonking from his rivals in order to claim his prize.

If you know anything about addiction, you will know that habitual lying is as common as breathing.

Marco and his pro peloton peers are all drug addicts--and all liars too. It goes hand in hand.

We are not kicking Pantani---if you read the posts, Lance Armstrong gets most of the blame--as he actively denies using drugs despite his growing crowd of insiders who caim he is a bald face liar.

The Pantani legacy is that he was killed by drug abuse and he was a Champion cyclist. This is the message to the public and it a true story.

The media did not inject Marco with drugs---he did.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 04:41 AM   #24
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

You add nothing new in substance. It is obvious you are done. Your assumptions are still only assumptions and not facts. Since you have wrongly inferred my first name, I can using your same logic, assume you are wrong in everything you infer. I can only give you this much; If the many are using PED's and those PED's are producing results, then there is pressure on the rest to also use PED's. This in no way means that Pantani used them, but only that the potential is there because of the atmosphere at present in cycling and other sports today. But I bring you back on the words of Merck on Pantani that I quoted earlier, and to which you might infer that he recognizes that drugs are a problem in the peleton today. But you can also infer that in his opinion, Pantani was as clean a champion as there was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
Sorry Charlie, Marco Pantani was a Francesco Conconi client--as was Denis Zanetti.

Neither of these athletes are with us today to 'deny PED abuses' so we need to grasp the obvious.

If you are implying that Pantani won his 1998 double, and danced away with Lance Armstrong in the 2000 TDF while using mineral water only---you are quite mistaken.

I don't need to condemn Marco for being a doper--despite it being an absolute fact---instead I condemn the entire pro peleton as being 100% abusers of drugs--then denying it, covering it up, activity enforcing an omerta, an evil code of silence/denial, and the promoters and advertisers both fund and supervise this fraud.

I did not imply Pantani was a cheat--a doper absolutely. They all dope--so cheating amongst cheaters is a tricky distinction. Leaders may get better drugs and better mad-doctor care than the rest. Is that cheating too?
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 06:49 AM   #26
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

As I said before you add no new substance. You play the same recording back and your pathetic logic of equating drug addiction with sport doping. I would like someone to prove to me that there is a higher percentage of drug addicts among cyclists and retired cyclists than in the general population. Also you say that i fail to accept that Pantani died of drug overdose at age 34. So I return my words from previous post so that you see that you either cannot read or do not read what i have written. "Look Flyer, that Pantani died of drug overdose is of course fact without question."

Also I never suggested he was murdered by anyone. I don't recall mentioning advertisers. Sporting authorities perhaps indirectly. But, am talking about organized crime having a hand in destroying his career and reputation, if you will go back and read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyer
There were no 'undoped' champions in cycling.


I am not the one suggesting that Marco Pantani was the last 'doping free' Grand Tour Champion which you appear to be doing. Lord knows why?

We know Marco died of a drug overdose at age 34. That is an absolute fact that you fail to accept.

Of all cyclists, Pantani is the poster child for doping in pro-cycling. No presumption needed.

Your position that somehow, Pantani was murdered by advertisers or by Italian sporting authorites is weak compared to his public record of suspensions, reckless driving, bi-polar condition, court cases and finally his own chemical demise.

You discredit the man who gave his life to point out the obvious fact. Grand Tour Champions use drugs, all manner of them.

Pantani is the modern legacy of doping in cycling.

Others will follow his example.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 12:31 PM   #28
VeloFlash
Registered User
 
VeloFlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilpirata
.....<snip>.... I would like someone to prove to me that there is a higher percentage of drug addicts among cyclists and retired cyclists than in the general population...<snip>


Easy.

According to US statistics about 5% of the general USA population are asthmatics.

However, 70% of the peloton in the TdF have Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUE's) for asthma drugs. That is 14 times the level of the general population. 11 of the last 13 TdF's have been won by riders who are "asthmatics".

Certain asthma drugs increase muscle volume by 50% and mask the use of other drugs.
__________________
VF

"Remember, even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat"
VeloFlash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-06.-2005, 08:32 PM   #30
ilpirata
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 333
Default Re: The clients of Michele Ferrari

This is good velo. Thanks for the post. It basically says if I understand correctly, that some amount of steroid is acceptable in blood and urine if you have the asthma certificate. Therefore a likely trick to using some PED's by cyclists including of course the defending champion. This is not what I am talking about however with drug addiction (cocaine in particular). In Pantani's case, what I am saying is this; cocaine was never used as a performance enhancer, but rather became a habit that took root in his depression. A depression brought on by what he perceived as injustices in the Italian cycling world and judicial system as well as a determined media attack on his reputation and integrity (and it was not just his perception). Thus I take issue with the idea that if a person dies of cocaine addiction he must have used PED's. If you want to say that a person who has used PED's for years, has a greater propensity to become a drug addict? Then I would say that you have an interesting theory that perhaps merits further investigation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeloFlash
Easy.

According to US statistics about 5% of the general USA population are asthmatics.

However, 70% of the peloton in the TdF have Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUE's) for asthma drugs. That is 14 times the level of the general population. 11 of the last 13 TdF's have been won by riders who are "asthmatics".

Certain asthma drugs increase muscle volume by 50% and mask the use of other drugs.
ilpirata is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet