Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Grip shift vs rapid fire

Poll: grip shift or rapid fire
Poll Options
grip shift or rapid fire

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 31-10.-2003, 04:38 AM   #31
Hecubus
Senior Member
 
Hecubus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 322
Default

This is one of those arguments that has no way to win. It is just too much of a personal preference thing. The new gripshift stuf like SRAM's 9.0 and X.0 shifters shift very nicely. Depending on what you have currently you might need a new derrailleur though because SRAM uses a different pull ratio than shimano. Rapidfire obviously shifts extremely well too. SRAMS new rapidfire shifters are supposed to be great but shimano's rapid fire stuff is also very perfected by now. Now you also have STI shifting thrown into the mix with the 2003 XTR and 2004 XT line which other people really love. I'd say that if you have a friend with a rapidfire bike take it for a ride and see how you like it before you buy.
Hecubus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11.-2003, 04:32 PM   #32
toolman
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1
Default

I know what bike you have and the grip shift on that bike was low end. I've never had a problem with grip shift, I use the top two models, but as everyone says-it's up to you. If I used rapid fire I would probably say to get it. For newbies I think it is better but I've used both and I'm not in a hurry to get rid of the grip!
toolman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-11.-2003, 09:54 AM   #33
juliebeanpie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 24
Default

I was a grip shift fan till I got my brain in gear (no pun intended) with my thumb and forefinger. Now that I can shift without thinking, the rapid fires live up to what they're called. Shifting is faster and smoother, thus giving more control on the trail. The only reason I started out with grip shift is that's what my bike came with. When I had the chance to build up my own bike, I was encouraged to go with rapid fire, and I'm glad I did!
juliebeanpie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12.-2003, 01:22 AM   #34
jmitting
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 94
Default

Tried a KHS and a KONA with grip shift, bought a GIANT with rapidfire.
jmitting is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12.-2003, 02:17 AM   #35
blackice
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: on my bike
Posts: 11
Default

i would definatley go with shimano rapid fire shifters
dont go for the cheaper sram ones that just came out
__________________
mess with the best die like the rest
blackice is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26-12.-2003, 06:03 AM   #36
b2b
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Default

I have experience with both and I vote for rapid fire. But after breaking my thumb I have problems to shift front derailleur. Stil pains even after more than a year.
b2b is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-12.-2003, 09:30 AM   #37
will1988
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ENGLAND
Posts: 36
Default

Use a gripshift as they are alot stronger and more less complicated to fit than rapid fire. Their shifting isn't bad either.
will1988 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-12.-2003, 07:13 AM   #38
jmcmillanut
Senior Member
 
jmcmillanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MGSuarez
there is a reason they call it Grip$hit!! One more vote for rapid fire! Really, it is just preferance.


Concur whole-heartedly! Rapid fire rules. It used to suck back in the early 90s (we used to call it "rapid failure"), but now it's kickin'. I've tried old gripshift and new, and I will never run a bike with that crap on it.

JMc
__________________
Don't go making snow cones at your local dog park. You will surely regret it.
jmcmillanut is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-01.-2004, 03:56 PM   #39
webified
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southern California, USA.
Posts: 2
Default No probelms ever with 'grip shift' in both mountain trail and street riding jouneys.

No probelms ever with 'grip shift' in both mountain trail and street riding adventures.

This discussion is much ado about nothing, aye?

Cheers!

Last edited by webified : 04-01.-2004 at 03:59 PM.
webified is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01.-2004, 04:39 AM   #40
Greg-O
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 163
Default

i used to have a bike with gripdshifts, and i loved them..... until i tried rapidfire. With gripshifts i would sometimes shift by accident.

it's really a preference though. It's a little hard to get used to having an up lever and a down lever at first.
Greg-O is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-01.-2004, 02:03 PM   #41
webified
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southern California, USA.
Posts: 2
Default Grip-shifters shifting by accident. Huh?

First off, for who it may concern, I happen to use both.

Why anyone could have their grip shift shift by accident leads me to believe that there may indeed be a problem with the operator - NOT THE GRIP SHIFT! Whatever...

I have used both for so long and have never had any major issues that would lead me to believe the idea that one is obviously superior to the other.

Kind of like comparing Ford's versus Chevy's or Wintel versus Mac's.

Much flip-flop ado about nothing.

Whatever gets you though the night!

Quote:
Originally posted by Greg-O
i used to have a bike with gripdshifts, and i loved them..... until i tried rapidfire. With gripshifts i would sometimes shift by accident.

it's really a preference though. It's a little hard to get used to having an up lever and a down lever at first.
webified is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-01.-2004, 12:25 AM   #42
Lab_Rat
Registered User
 
Lab_Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 215
Default

My 2004 XT dual control kit have just arrived, so I'm dead keen to get them on my bike. I've always used Deore LX changers and have never had a problem with them. They always do the business. Lets see how the new system works.
__________________
Despite all my rage, I'm still just a rat in a cage
Lab_Rat is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02.-2004, 01:56 PM   #43
dwj444
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 61
Default Re: Grip shift vs rapid fire

I rode MTB seriously for a while in college before a bad wreck and I would swear by rapid fire over grip shifting any day. I started on an old Trek 800 without suspension and with grip shifters. Less than six months later I upgraded to a Specialized Hard Rock with a front fork and rapid fire shifters . . . the difference was night and day.

Although I ride road now, I have no hesitation recommending that you junk the grip shifter and go with the rapid fire.

Good luck.
__________________
Time to make the doughnuts.
dwj444 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-02.-2004, 09:11 AM   #44
Solanog
Registered User
 
Solanog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Posts: 220
Default

Rapid fire, I've been told that with grip shift when wet or muddy is difficult to shift, it slips, specially if you're tired and your hands feel weak
Solanog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23-02.-2004, 07:59 AM   #45
davebee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Manchester and South London
Posts: 440
Send a message via MSN to davebee
Default

Rapid Fire for me. I have smashed several sets of gripshifters apart. They were lower end junk.
davebee is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet