![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 27
|
the ruse - the story...
are there any hills that are just literally impossible to ride? close to where I live there is a hill that on the O/S Explorer map shows with one arrow head upon it meaning that it is greater than 15%, i believe. Going down the hill in top gear (59-12) with a cadence of about 115 I got a speed of 47.9mph (i bet that wouldn't hurt if I came off). Going up the hill with a cadence of 33 and speed of about 4.4 mph (gear 39-23, my heart turning over 154bpm). Sitting in the saddle I began to wonder if it would be better to walk! Seriously though, what sort of speeds would pro's 'fly' up this? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 27
|
also, what is a cat 1 climb? and how many cats does it go up to cat 5? 7? 20?!!!
Advice would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
ArchAngel
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Orion Nebula
Posts: 2,163
|
Hors = Out of category i.e. sickly steep
Cat 1 = Most difficult ... ... Cat 4 = Least difficult Anything else is considered a slight incline, flat or false flat (but this probably only applies to pro bikers) During this years Giro the top climbers went up the steepest section of Monte Zoncolan, which is about 100m at 27%, doing between 10-15 km/h. Click here for Zoncolans profile. Click here to calculate gradient.
__________________
Pain is inevitable...suffering is optional |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 70
|
I guess it depends on your gearing as to whether they are impossible to ride
The only hills that still stump me nowadays are the off-road ones, try a single arrow over rocky terrain and see where your HR goes ... but then again I live surrounded by hills with one arrow and a few with two (20%) and you soon get used to them and in the end you crave them Shall have to work on managing 10 let alone 15km/h up a 20% let alone 27% though
__________________
there's no gain without pain |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
|
See if you can map Fargo Street in Los Angeles, CA. It's twisted. About 200m long. I tried to climb it several times when I was young, strong, and stupid. Inevitably, something would fail -- once my rear wheel let go and rubbed the chainstay, etc. Never made it. There were annual contests to get up it, and supposedly some joker did it on a beach cruiser!
There are other supersteeps in San Francisco, but I think Fargo is worse. The 30m right before my driveway's no fun either. Great way to end a ride. In my 39-29 standing and going as slow as possible, my heart still breaks 170. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
Something bigger and better does exist outside of the USA! Here is, officially, the steepest hill in the world according to the Guinness Book of Records - http://www.nzbike.com/activities/steepestroad.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange, California
Posts: 331
|
Here's a motivating story about Fargo Street in L.A.:
http://home.comcast.net/~wymanburke/FargoStreet.html The guy made 26 ascents up the 33% climb, and he was in his 40's!!!
__________________
Send comments, praise, or flames to: jm_560@Hotmail.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
|
Quote:
Pffff, can't be! Pure propaganda, or inferior foreign measurement methods. ;-) The Fargo pics are awesome. They definitely do not do the reality it's true justice, though. And zig-zagging is cheating!!! I tried the straight up method using what I think was a 39-24 or 39-26. Nope! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 38
|
I lived in Dunedin for four years, few people tackle this sucker.....man its step.
The run up and down it is the funniest thing I have observed, talk about blood and pain. Somw students got in a wheely bin and went down it and both were killed a year back..........bad stuff. This street is step, they have a major uni down there and the science people are bang on, the worst part is near the top. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
|
Ha! I KNEW it! Another fake foreign claim! I figured that it was impossible to have a street steeper than 20-something degrees. I mean, how the heck could you ever build on it?
I stand by my Frisco streets and Fargo. Someday when I'm in shape, I'll try our locals nightmares in my 39-29. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
Aztec, I think you should stay behind after school and write 100 times Measuring a gradient as a percentage results in a different figure than an angle of slope expressed as degrees 45 degrees expressed as a gradient percentage is about 26.5% (from memory). That is the error, comparing degrees to percentage gradient, in the article you are basing your patriotic "fake foreign" outcry. Here is another extract referring to your SFO streets - "New Zealand is home to the steepest public street in the world. Baldwin Street in Dunedin has a gradient of 1 in 2.86 at its steepest section, a 38% grade, and is officially recognised in the Guinness Book of Records. That's steeper than anything on offer in San Francisco, where the steepest two tie for first place and are Filbert between Leavenworth and Hyde; and 22nd Street between Church and Vicksburg, both with a 31.5% gradient." J-Mat claims Fargo Street is only 33% - without providing any reference to a peer reviewed double blind independent study .Last edited by VeloFlash : 01-08.-2003 at 01:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
|
Velo -- Don't try to confuse me with the facts or fancy booklearnin' math.
;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange, California
Posts: 331
|
Veloflash:
I'm not sure you will find a peer reviewed double-blind study concerning road gradients. I'm just going off what the organizers of the event say it is. To my knowledge there haven't been any disputes as to the 33% claim. I've been up that hill in my car and I can tell you it's scary steep. But who cares if Fargo is 33% or Dunedin is 38%??? Anything over 12% give me a good workout. Hats off to anyone who can get up either!!!
__________________
Send comments, praise, or flames to: jm_560@Hotmail.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 447
|
There's a street in Hobart - Mellifont Street, which is super steep. I haven't measured the gradient, but next time I go there I will. Definitely will not attempt to go up on the bike and not brave enough to go down - it's a fairly busy street.
Some goose rode a skateboard down it and made the front page of the paper - lying in hospital with multiple fractures! |
|
|
|