Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Global warming

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05.-2007, 08:59 PM   #91
vadiver
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 313
Default Re: Global warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm
<snip>
If they couldn't get it right back then.....how are they all of a sudden getting it right today?
Because Algore said so. nah, nah, nah...

You are right. I also believe in the next 10 - 15 years this will die down, then in about 30 years we will be predicitng the next ice age. Again, this is cyclical.
vadiver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-05.-2007, 07:17 AM   #92
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: Global warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm
so...if global warming is a fact...



There's no "if".

It is a fact - global warming is happening.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm

is it because of HUMANS?--is THAT a fact?



Is it because of humans??
Who created the means for gases to be emmitted?

I think you're getting confused.
You probably intended to write - is the emmission of green house gases the cause of global warming?????
Which would be a reasonable question to ask.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm

if it is NOT caused by us, then who the fuck are WE to think we can stop it?

THAT is the supreme arrogance.....not that Algore says the debate is over (he says that because when your argument is weak or severely lacking, you can't stand the bright-lights of real debate so all you have left is to say, ''case closed, done. we're right and you're wrong, nah-nah nah-nah-nah.'')......



The case is closed as regards the fact that temperatures are increasing.

Or are you trying to suggest that temperatures are not increasing?

What may be disputed is what is causing the increase in temperatures.
But the central point, that temperatures have increased, is not in dispute.
Nor what is causing that increase - but we'll address that.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm

then again, man is always ready to be convinced that He is like God and can do anything. Pride the downfall always innit?

If the costs of this scheme were negligible, then sure, why not, let's go for it....hell, I've done my part for decades by riding my road bike-cycle to work and home. If we get carbon offsets in arrears (not counting on THAT btw) then i'm golden. golden baby.


Who suggested that the costs were negligible?
I haven't read anyone here saying that the cost were negligible.

The cost of recommissioning everything that pumps green house gases in to the atmosphere - from powerplants, to planes, to cars - will be huge.

But if we chose not to address climate change - then we're snookered also.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm
i'm not all that bothered really. you see sure, when there's a warmer-than-normal spring and winter in many places (such as what Europe has seen) and when there are more tornadoes and hurricanes than normal, then lazy science attributes it to global warming.


The science - through observation and recording - has shown that temperatures are getting hotter.
The science isn't based upon an observation of a single year or season - "warmer-than-normal spring" - in a single location.
Average temperatures readings - over a time period and at different locations
are used.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert Pilarm
Gosh....did we have global warming in Alaska this winter? It was a colder winter than normal and we got tons of snow, and the nordic ski trails saw near record 'latest grooming dates' (and of course i skate-skied my ass off and had a ball).


Tons of snow in Alaska.
Maybe they should shift all that Alaskan snow to the Arctic - where huge tracts of ice has melted in the past five years.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05.-2007, 01:14 AM   #93
ndbiker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 51
Default Re: Global warming

I don't want to open up a can of worms, well OK maybe I do, but I found this websight. http://theanchoressonline.com/2007/02/26/. If this can be verified, which I'm sure it can, it puts President Bush in quite the juxtiposition to Mr. Gore. I found it while searching for information on carbon offsets. I can be carbon neutral for about $270. Buying a Hummer might up that about $75 a year. By Mr. Gore's reasoning why not? I'll be carbon neutral. It's sure cheaper than a geothermal heatpump or solar powered water heating. This environmental activism thing isn't so bad. I can feel good and get what I want at the same time. Ok guys I'm in. We're all going to die because of global warming. Buy OFFSETS!
ndbiker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05.-2007, 06:17 AM   #94
Ratiocinator
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
Default Re: Global warming

Source: http://rense.com/general76/cow.htm

The UN report (PDF): http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/lib...ad/A0701E00.pdf

Cow Emissions Harm Planet
Far More Than C02 From Cars

By Geoffrey Lean
Environment Editor
4-19-7


Meet the world's top destroyer of the environment. It is not the car, or the plane,or even George Bush: it is the cow.

A United Nations report has identified the world's rapidly growing herds of cattle as the greatest threat to the climate, forests and wildlife. And they are blamed for a host of other environmental crimes, from acid rain to the introduction of alien species, from producing deserts to creating dead zones in the oceans, from poisoning rivers and drinking water to destroying coral reefs.


The 400-page report by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, entitled Livestock's Long Shadow, also surveys the damage done by sheep, chickens, pigs and goats. But in almost every case, the world's 1.5 billion cattle are most to blame. Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together.


Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide.


Livestock also produces more than 100 other polluting gases, including more than two-thirds of the world's emissions of ammonia, one of the main causes of acid rain.


Ranching, the report adds, is "the major driver of deforestation" worldwide, and overgrazing is turning a fifth of all pastures and ranges into desert.Cows also soak up vast amounts of water: it takes a staggering 990 litres of water to produce one litre of milk.

Wastes from feedlots and fertilisers used to grow their feed overnourish water, causing weeds to choke all other life. And the pesticides, antibiotics and hormones used to treat them get into drinking water and endanger human health.


The pollution washes down to the sea, killing coral reefs and creating "dead zones" devoid of life. One is up to 21,000sqkm, in the Gulf of Mexico, where much of the waste from US beef production is carried down the Mississippi.


The report concludes that, unless drastic changes are made, the massive damage done by livestock will more than double by 2050, as demand for meat increases.


Patricia A. Doyle DVM, PhD
Bus Admin, Tropical Agricultural Economics Univ of West Indies

Please visit my "Emerging Diseases" message board at:
http://www.emergingdisease.org/phpbb/index.php Also my new website: http://drpdoyle.tripod.com/ Zhan le Devlesa tai sastimasa Go with God and in Good Health
Ratiocinator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05.-2007, 06:49 AM   #95
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: Global warming

By that logic - then mankind itself also contributes to CO2 emmissions every time each of us exhales.
(we inhale oxygen - we exhale carbon dioxide).
Coupled with the vast emmissions from cars/planes/power plants/homes : all contribute to the increasing level of greenhouse gas emmissions.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-05.-2007, 07:08 AM   #96
vadiver
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 313
Default Re: Global warming

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
By that logic - then mankind itself also contributes to CO2 emmissions every time each of us exhales.
(we inhale oxygen - we exhale carbon dioxide).
Coupled with the vast emmissions from cars/planes/power plants/homes : all contribute to the increasing level of greenhouse gas emmissions.
Duh

Not to mention the number of people that are on the earth. In the past 30 years the US alone has added 100M 98.6 heat sinks.

But yeat the GW Alarmests want to blame it all on the Capitalistic Industrial Revolution.

And that is why so many people poo poo the GW science.

People want to quote this half degree centigrade increase in temp in the past 100 years. How does that compare to the past 500 years? Warmer or cooler?
vadiver is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-05.-2007, 12:40 AM   #97
ndbiker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 51
Default Re: Global warming

ndbiker is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet