Page 10 - Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

14-05.-2006, 11:06 AM

#136

Wurm

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 2,148

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

I may need to be corrected here but, if I understand correctly, Wurm believes George W Bush actually knew New York would be attacked and deliberately did nothing. That is, he was somehow in on it.

The evidence points to that conclusion is what I know. I also know that choosing to ignore those facts does not render them invalid.

We've been over this before.

__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.

15-05.-2006, 07:45 AM

#137

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

If, as you say, Bush plotted 9/11 for his own ends, it follows Katrina must also have been contrived and Bush deliberately did nothing to protect New Orleans.
I also suppose Bush maybe got a kick out of running for his life in his pyjamas to make his plot seem more authentic the day of the attacks?
You know, I got knocked off my bike some weeks ago and that was George Bush's fault as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wurm

The evidence points to that conclusion is what I know. I also know that choosing to ignore those facts does not render them invalid.

We've been over this before.

15-05.-2006, 08:15 PM

#138

darkboong

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,534

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

"4) Iran does not have a history of acts of aggression against it's neighbours (Israel and the US are both guilty of attacking Iran - repeatedly)."

I think you just ran into a little trap of your own making, which illustrates my point perfectly.
Can I ask how come you just made no mention of the Iran/Iraq war? Frankly I

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

find it amazing how you cite Israel and the U.S. with regard to Iran yet gloss over one of the biggest Middle Eastern wars in years - involving 2 Arab States.

I have brought that particular war up on numerous occasions. In fact I even brought it up in another post to this very board on this very topic. Pity you chose to ignore it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

So, hold on a bit for a second. What about Iraq? What about all those anti-Iranian broadcasts on Iraqi T.V. during the war years that portrayed Iran as dangerous?

Ooh, do you think that might have been propaganda. As I recall the same thing went on here in Blighty during the Falklands War.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

This is a solid point Melanie Phillips once made: Those folks in England who blame the U.S. and Israel for aggressions always seem to make exceptions for Arab aggression. That is, it's apparently no big deal for Saddam to invade

That is demonstratably false in every case that I know of.It is demonstratably false within the context of me on this very board. Melanie P either lying through her teeth or she does not understand what she writes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

neighbours but when the U.S. or Israel acts aggressively, there are protests on the streets, burnings of flags and the like.
I don't recall any burnings of the Iraq flag by you guys when he invaded Kuwait.

You didn't even know me back in 1990 Crappy. I was outraged that the UN and US were so passive for so long. I was outraged that the US and UK had been supplying weapons right up to the point where Saddam's tanks rolled towards the border.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

So, yes, I'm stunned you stated the U.S. and Israel behaved aggressively towards Iran (which is true) but you kept silent over Iraq.

You are stunned because you utterly divorced from reality. You are unable to accurately quote or paraphrase posts in a single thread over a span of 5 days . What chance do you have to comprehend events that span a period of 60 years or more. What chance do you have to comprehend whole cultures, millions of people or empathise with the shredded families in Fallujah ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Another point: Iran, you say, has no history of aggression. So, what about the Iran/Iraq war? Saddam believed Iran was a threat at the time and millions lost their lives on both sides.

It shouldn't surprise you that much really. Saddam "pre-emptively" waged war on Iran on zero evidence, and he had the full support of the US all the way. Go figure where that thinking came from, take a look at the history of Cheney and his neo-con staff.

__________________
Free Beer !

15-05.-2006, 09:24 PM

#139

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

"You didn't even know me back in 1990 Crappy. I was outraged that the UN and US were so passive for so long. I was outraged that the US and UK had been supplying weapons right up to the point where Saddam's tanks rolled towards the border."

I still think my objection is reasonable. Your posts appear to project the idea that Israel is totally to blame and the U.S. is some kind of imperialistic, warmonger regime that is to be blamed for all the wrongs on the planet. Still that's your view and you have a right to your opinion.
I've stated many times that the U.S. does indeed fall short of the standards it ought to be adhering to and that I didn't agree with the Iraq War but I see this as rational criticism. Added to that, you're all well aware by now I'm very critical of the Arab World and I don't subscribe to the common view over here that instability in the Arab World is all down to the U.S., Europe and Israel.
What I pointed out is you originally glossed over Saddam's war with Iran and you only made mention of the U.S. and Israel.
"I was outraged that the UN and US were so passive for so long. I was outraged that the US and UK had been supplying weapons right up to the point where Saddam's tanks rolled towards the border."
Glad to hear it.
So maybe you need to voice these criticisms more often and weigh up your criticisms of the U.S. against Iran's conduct, i.e. criticize abuses on all sides?
For example, too few people seem to have been outraged over Iran's making fun of the hollocaust supposedly to tke revenge over those cartoons published in Denmark. However, what we need to bear in mind is the cartoons published in Iran that make fun of the hollocaust seem to reflect ideas held by the Iranians authorities wheras the cartoons in Denmark only reflected an idea by one periodical - not condoneed by the government. Plus hollocust victims were Slavs nd gypsies nd not just Jews.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkboong

Sure. It's quite simple. The Iraq-Iran war was started by Saddam Hussein. He had the political, economic *and* material help of the USA. There are claims that the USA even *instigated* the attack on Iran by Iraq. One of the claims regarding Halabja is that the US actually supplied intelligence (including satellite photos), VX gas AND the plans for deploying the nerve gas. If you accept that as fact it is reasonable to infer that the US played an even greater role in the Iran/Iraq war.

I have brought that particular war up on numerous occasions. In fact I even brought it up in another post to this very board on this very topic. Pity you chose to ignore it.

Ooh, do you think that might have been propaganda. As I recall the same thing went on here in Blighty during the Falklands War.

That is demonstratably false in every case that I know of.It is demonstratably false within the context of me on this very board. Melanie P either lying through her teeth or she does not understand what she writes.

You didn't even know me back in 1990 Crappy. I was outraged that the UN and US were so passive for so long. I was outraged that the US and UK had been supplying weapons right up to the point where Saddam's tanks rolled towards the border.

You are stunned because you utterly divorced from reality. You are unable to accurately quote or paraphrase posts in a single thread over a span of 5 days . What chance do you have to comprehend events that span a period of 60 years or more. What chance do you have to comprehend whole cultures, millions of people or empathise with the shredded families in Fallujah ?

It shouldn't surprise you that much really. Saddam "pre-emptively" waged war on Iran on zero evidence, and he had the full support of the US all the way. Go figure where that thinking came from, take a look at the history of Cheney and his neo-con staff.

15-05.-2006, 09:50 PM

#140

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Here's why many western politicians are suspicious of Iran:

"A prominent Iranian newspaper says it is going to hold a competition for cartoons on the Holocaust to test whether the West will apply the principle of freedom of expression to the Nazi genocide against Jews as it did to the caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad."

This seems a pretty flawed argument because no western government ever called for censorship within Iran in the first place whereas Iran did indeed call for western governments to ban any attempt by journalists to poke fun at religion.
More importantly, the Iranians don't seem to understand the President of Denmark and many other European Presidents did actually apologise for cartoons published in an independent newspaper and only refused to actually intervene in the free press to close papers down e.t.c.
But Iran's President hasn't apologised for the Iranian newspaper's decision to make fun of the tragedies that involved WW2 and that's pretty serious diplomatically. It would be akin to Bush waving an American newspaper cartoon of the 9/11 incident in his country and saying, "Hey, isn't that amusing?"
Let's remember here that hollocaust victims were not only Jewish. Blacks, gays, Slavs and Romany peoples were all destined to be wiped out and then Iran decides it might be a good idea to make fun of the incident as a national passtime?

So, this is point worth thinking about, I figure.
This is basically why there are people out there who don't think a nuclear armed Iran is a good idea - especially the Israelis. Plus the hollocaust competition went down like a lead baloon in Russia - given the fact millions of Russians died in the camps.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkboong

16-05.-2006, 01:31 AM

#141

darkboong

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,534

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

So maybe you need to voice these criticisms more often and weigh up your criticisms of the U.S. against Iran's conduct, i.e. criticize abuses on all sides?

I can't see the point in Moral Relativism when making a value judgement. It has a role in discussing exploring people's value systems, but it doesn't make sense to use it as your Moral Compass. A look through just about any thread I have posted to will show that I do acknowledge and discuss the abuses and amoral actions of both sides. There are plenty of posts I have made where that occurs, you have even quoted some. It is your loss that you didn't bother to read and acknowledge the points made in them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

For example, too few people seem to have been outraged over Iran's making fun of the hollocaust supposedly to tke revenge over those cartoons published in Denmark.

The Danish editor specifically vetoed cartoons about Christian figures prior to those cartoons. He operated on a Double Standard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

However, what we need to bear in mind is the cartoons published in Iran that make fun of the hollocaust seem to reflect ideas held by the Iranians authorities wheras the cartoons in Denmark only reflected an idea by one periodical - not condoneed by the government.

The Danish government are blatantly right wing. The Editor has close ties with the Danish Government.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Plus hollocust victims were Slavs nd gypsies nd not just Jews.

[/QUOTE]

You would not believe that listening to you and your Zionist pals. The Holocaust Musuem is plowing up an ancient Muslim tomb for example.

Oh, and answer the bloody question or continue to look like a hypcrite and a twerp.

__________________
Free Beer !

16-05.-2006, 01:43 AM

#142

darkboong

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,534

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

It would be akin to Bush waving an American newspaper cartoon of the 9/11 incident in his country and saying, "Hey, isn't that amusing?"

No it wouldn't. You have cracked.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

This is basically why there are people out there who don't think a nuclear armed Iran is a good idea - especially the Israelis. Plus the hollocaust competition went down like a lead baloon in Russia - given the fact millions of Russians died in the camps.

Nuclear Armed Anyone is a bad idea, but realistically Iran having a Nuclear deterrent would most likely stabilise the region somewhat. At present Israel and the US have infinitely more ICBMs than Iran, and they have stated flat out that they intend to maintain that situation AND exploit it by holding Iran at Nuclear gunpoint while they attack. The US and Israel are politically committed to attacking Iran, and Iran is vulnerable to attack, and that is the source of the unstability.

That said I don't want anyone to have nuclear weapons, because weapons are there to be used, as Israel and the US have pointed out so frequently themselves.

__________________
Free Beer !

16-05.-2006, 08:46 AM

#143

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

"While we are on the subject of attributing blame exclusively to a particular race and/or creed I would like to draw your attention to the London bombers. You stated outright that the perpetrators were Muslim Immigrants, and that they had the help of Al Queda. Here in reality the bombers were British Nationals and they HAD NO CONTACT with Al Queda."

I think you seem to be misunderstanding my posts. I don't blame races for suicide bombings or other forms of killing, I blame extreme religion and ideology. I've pointed out many times that people have killed, maimed and tortured before in the name of Christianity and Judaism too.
However, Christians and Jews were more problematic in ancient times or maybe mediaeval period. This current period, however, has seen the rise of radical Islam and it's this specific ideology I've attacked in the past. I've opposed mass immigration on the grounds of the religious ideology that comes with it. This is what Prof Dawkin has pointed out too.
It has nothing to do with race. I have no fears over India having WMD but, as I said before, I simply don't trust Iran and many other people would agree with me on that score.

"A look through just about any thread I have posted to will show that I do acknowledge and discuss the abuses and amoral actions of both sides."

I have my own opinions on that point but really it's a question for other members on the forum. Do they see you as taking a side or being neutral? Personally I don't mind being seen to take a side. If push comes to shove, I would have to support the U.S. and Israel, although my true ideology is closer to communism than capitalism.

"This is a classic example of what I was talking about with Mel P's outrageous claim that you paraphrased."

She's currently in the U.S. and causing something of a sensation. M.P. has been getting quite a following of late and it may have been M.P. who revealed the recent facts that have put Blair in deep trouble with the electorate. The pen, as they say, is mightier than the sword.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkboong

That is because your English Comprehension is so bloody lamentable. I don't "appear to project" anything, let alone something along the lines of one particular bunch are to blame for the world's trouble. For a start I specifically mentioned the UK in that paragraph you just quoted and yet you are so mindnumblingly stupid that you went on to say I exclusively attributed blame to the US and Israel.

This is a classic example of what I was talking about with Mel P's outrageous claim that you paraphrased.

While we are on the subject of attributing blame exclusively to a particular race and/or creed I would like to draw your attention to the London bombers. You stated outright that the perpetrators were Muslim Immigrants, and that they had the help of Al Queda. Here in reality the bombers were British Nationals and they HAD NO CONTACT with Al Queda.

I can't see the point in Moral Relativism when making a value judgement. It has a role in discussing exploring people's value systems, but it doesn't make sense to use it as your Moral Compass. A look through just about any thread I have posted to will show that I do acknowledge and discuss the abuses and amoral actions of both sides. There are plenty of posts I have made where that occurs, you have even quoted some. It is your loss that you didn't bother to read and acknowledge the points made in them.

The Danish editor specifically vetoed cartoons about Christian figures prior to those cartoons. He operated on a Double Standard.

The Danish government are blatantly right wing. The Editor has close ties with the Danish Government.

You would not believe that listening to you and your Zionist pals. The Holocaust Musuem is plowing up an ancient Muslim tomb for example.

Oh, and answer the bloody question or continue to look like a hypcrite and a twerp.[/QUOTE]

16-05.-2006, 09:03 AM

#144

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

"That's not the point you twerp. The point is to test whether Western Governments apply their own censorship values to Iran in their reaction. As it turns out I think that the reaction to competition has been a bit of a damp squib (sensibly IMO)."

Just one point: Had Iran countered by pointing out a certain British historian was jailed in Austria over a book that questioned the hollocaust, I'd have agreed with Iran. I believe it is totally wrong for Austria to send an academic to jail for stating a view. It's up to other historians to prove him wrong or argue the case.
However, making fun of the hollocaust per se has done Iran no favours. As I pointed out before, Denmark's President didn't endorse the Mohammad cartoons published in a Danish newspaper - he refused to censor the cartoons - that's all.
Iran was calling for European censorship and if you agree with censorship then you ain't a liberal.
However, the Iranian elite made no attempt to apologise for cartoons mocking the hollocaust published in Iran. Let's remember Europe hasn't called on Iran to censor or ban their own press or remove the cartoons that were published in retribution. It's about official state attitudes to the press not censorship of the press.
What happens is we have seen apparent official approval of the cartoons the Iranian periodical published.
I repeat, Denmark never officially approved of the Mohammad cartoons.
There is clearly a major difference. Millions of people died in concentration camps and millions of these victims were Slavs, gypsies or disabled folks. Yet Iran thinks this is amusing and a means of testing reaction in Europe?
To my mind it reveals specificically that Israel and the U.S. have good reason to distrust Iran's alleged peaceful nuclear program.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkboong

That's not the point you twerp. The point is to test whether Western Governments apply their own censorship values to Iran in their reaction. As it turns out I think that the reaction to competition has been a bit of a damp squib (sensibly IMO).

No it wouldn't. You have cracked.

Nuclear Armed Anyone is a bad idea, but realistically Iran having a Nuclear deterrent would most likely stabilise the region somewhat. At present Israel and the US have infinitely more ICBMs than Iran, and they have stated flat out that they intend to maintain that situation AND exploit it by holding Iran at Nuclear gunpoint while they attack. The US and Israel are politically committed to attacking Iran, and Iran is vulnerable to attack, and that is the source of the unstability.

That said I don't want anyone to have nuclear weapons, because weapons are there to be used, as Israel and the US have pointed out so frequently themselves.

16-05.-2006, 09:15 AM

#145

Carrera

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Location: Staffordshire

Posts: 4,816

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

"The Danish editor specifically vetoed cartoons about Christian figures prior to those cartoons. He operated on a Double Standard."

I don't think there has ever been any major fear over upsetting Christians in modern times. David Soul has been doing the Springer Show all over the country and Christians have only carried out some minor protests. Yes, there have been demonstrations outside the theatres but that's about it.
I seriously doubt the Danes feel a need to censor cartoons over Christianity as there wouldn't be a major problem - just some small protests, I guess.

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkboong

You would not believe that listening to you and your Zionist pals. The Holocaust Musuem is plowing up an ancient Muslim tomb for example.

Oh, and answer the bloody question or continue to look like a hypcrite and a twerp.[/QUOTE]

16-05.-2006, 10:39 AM

#146

darkboong

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,534

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Nonetheless the Danish editore specifically vetoed cartoons about Christian figures prior to the publication of the cartoons ridiculing Islam. He operated on a Double Standard.

Oh, and what evidence do you have to support your claim that Iran is "Dangerous" and "Unstable" exactly ?

__________________
Free Beer !

16-05.-2006, 10:45 AM

#147

darkboong

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 1,534

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

I repeat, Denmark never officially approved of the Mohammad cartoons.

That was not the Issue. The Issue was the hypocritical censorship applied by the Editor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

There is clearly a major difference.

There clearly is not a major difference.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

Millions of people died in concentration camps and millions of these victims were Slavs, gypsies or disabled folks. Yet Iran thinks this is amusing and a means of testing reaction in Europe?

In other words : You claim that Europe has the right to have a pop below the belt at Iran, but Iran doesn't have the right to have a pop below the belt back ?

Both editors need their heads banging together IMO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

To my mind it reveals specificically that Israel and the U.S. have good reason to distrust Iran's alleged peaceful nuclear program.

Israel and the US have stated thier intent to wage war on Iran. They are simply projecting their motives upon their target (Iran). Dumb and likely to backfire nastily.

__________________
Free Beer !

16-05.-2006, 03:54 PM

#148

Wurm

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 2,148

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carrera

I have posed the many lingering questions surrounding the 9/11 events here several times in the past, and none of you that defend the Neo Cons has ever ONCE sufficiently rebutted ANY of those questions.

The evidence however supports a prima facie case against BushCo. Your lame denials only go to prove your gullibility and/or stupidity.

16-05.-2006, 04:07 PM

#149

wolfix

Registered User

Join Date: Mar 2005

Location: "Still in 1975"

Posts: 2,722

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wurm

Wurm , you are best ignored as the looney individual in the forum neighborhood. You believe what you want.

__________________
"I rule my world with a cellphone."

16-05.-2006, 09:27 PM

#150

Wurm

Registered User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 2,148

Re: Israeli: Iran bought missiles from N.Korea

What is "looney" is that morons like yourself continue to ignore the facts.

Try these on for size:

911 - THE BASIC QUESTIONS

1. Why didn't jets intercept the airliners since they had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks?

2. Why did Ashcroft stop flying commercial, citing an unidentified "threat" in July 2001?

3. Why were there no photos or videos of the Pentagon plane?

4. Why didn't the Secret Service hustle Dubya out of the classroom?

5. Where was George H. W. Bush at the time of the attacks?

6. Why did passengers or crewmembers on three of the flights all use the term boxcutters?

7. Where are the flight recorders?

8. Why were the FISA warrants discontinued?

9. How did Bush see the first plane crash on live camera?

10 Why was security meeting scheduled for 9/11cancelled by WTC management on 9/10?

11. How did they come up with the "culprits" so quickly?

12. How did they find the terrorist's cars at the airports so quickly?

13. Why did Shrub dissolve the Bin Laden Task Force?

14. Why the strange pattern of debris from Flight 93?

15. [DELETED]

16. How extensive was the relationship between the Taliban, the ISI and the CIA?

17. What exactly was the role of Henry Kissinger at UNOCAL?

18. When was it decided to cancel building a pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan?

19. When was the decision made to send the FEMA to New York?

20. Why did FEMA spokesman Tom Kenney tell Dan Rather he was in New York on Sept. 10?

21. Why did the FBI in 1996 close the files to investigate Osama bin Laden's relatives in Washington?

22. Why did .Bush stop inquiries into terrorist connections of the Bin Laden family in early 2001?

23. Who made the decision to have John O'Neill stop investigating Al-qeada accounts?

24. Who gave the decision to give him a security job at the World Trade Center?

25. Did John O'Neill meet anyone of the FEMA in the night of September 10th?

26. What about media reports that hijackers bought tickets for flights scheduled after Sept. 11?

27. Why did none of the 19 hijackers appeared on the passenger lists?

28. Why would devout Muslims frequent bars, drink alcoholic beverages and leave their bibles?

29. Why would the hijackers use credit cards and allow drivers licenses with photos to be zeroxed?

30. Why did the hijackers force passengers to call relatives?

31. How did the hijackers change the flight plan without law enforcement or the military try to stop them?

32. Which hijacker's passport was found in the WTC rubble? Who found it and what time?

33. How could the FBI distinguish between "regular" Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights?

34. Why was there not one "innocent" Muslim on board any of these flights?

35. Did someone go through the passenger lists looking for Muslim names and label them as hijackers? MOHAMMED ATTA

36. Did the Florida police provide information that Atta was searched because of 1)an expired Visa, 2) driving a car without a license, 3) because of an incident at Miami Airport?

37. Why did Atta leave his bag at the airport and the employees didn't put it on board?

38. Who found his bag? How can we be sure it it was his bag?

39. Why did Atta place a video "how to fly planes", a uniform and his last will into his bag, knowing that he would commit suicide?

40. Why did Atta leave his drivers license in a rental car?

41. When did Atta train on a flight simulator?

42. Did Atta leave the US while in training and then return?

43. Why did Atta decide to study at Opa Locka, a famous hub of 6 Navy training bases and includes government partners like U.S. Coast Guard Air Station, Police (Miami-Dade) Aviation Unit?

44. Why was Atta allowed to study since he was stopped by the police for driving without a license and also for violating his visa? THE BLACK BOXES AND CRASH VIDEO

45. Why were the Black Boxes never recovered ?

46. Why didn't the FBI release the air traffic controller's protocols?

47. Why did the FBI not release the Flight Data Recorder info?

48. Who video-recorded the first plane hitting the tower? Why did he disappear from the media? THE HIJACKERS

49. How did the FBI receive a tip from a passenger who boarded a different plane and reached his destination safely that he had a confrontation with two ME men at the Logan airport in Boston?

50. Who tipped the FBI to storm the Westin Hotel in Boston on September 12th?

51. Where did the photos of all 19 hijackers come from?

52. How were all hijackers identified just 2 days after the attack?

53. Why did all 19 names not appear on the passenger list 2 days after the hijacker list was released?

54. Why do none of the names appear on the passenger lists UA and AA gave to CNN?

55. How could the hijackers disable the defense systems?

56. Why did the FBI ignore Bin Laden's family, who left the United States without further investigation

57. What about the supposed hijackers who are still alive?

58. Was there a reason to change the list of the original 19 hijackers?

59. What happened to Ayub Ali Khan and Mohammed Jaweed Azmath, who have been in jail since September 2001, because of possession of box cutters on a train?Who gave the tip to arrest them?

60. Why did it take 4 months before Ramsi Binalschibhs name was mentioned, since he was a good friend of Mohammad Atta and lived in his apartment in Hamburg?

61. Why did it take 4 months until December 11 to charge Zacarias Moussaoui for the 9/11 attacks when his case was known worldwide for months, but not mentioned in the American media?

62. Whatever happened with Lotfi Raissi, who was arrested in UK for teaching the terrorist pilots?

63. What is the current status of the investigation of Mamoun Darkazanli Import-Export-Company in Hamburg and Al Taqwa Management Organisation in Lugano?

64. Why was Richard Reid able to enter the Paris airport twice and who paid for his hotel?

65. Who hired Zacarias Masspoui to learn how to fly passenger jets in the United States?

66. Why did the FBI or CIA fail to interrogate him between August and December 2001? BIN LADEN

67. Did the CIA monitor Bin Laden in 1998 with the help of 15 Afghan agents, paid $1,000/ month?

68. Where are these agents? Was Johnny "Mike" Spann one? Was John Walker Lindh one?

69. Is an Afghan agent a member of the ISI? Is an Afghan agent working for Bin Laden?

70. When was the first time Tenet mentioned the Al-Quaeda group to any member of the Senate?

71. Why did the Pentagon release a new video version or translation of the Bin Laden Home video?

72. Why it was released only 8 hours after translation by the German magazine MONITOR on December ?

73. Why were the four translators prior US-Government workers?

74. When was the Bin Laden Home Video found and who found it?

75. Who found the video if Northern Alliance and US troops had not yet arrived in Kandahar or Jahalabad?

76. Does the timestamp on the Bin Laden video indicate that it was found two weeks after it was produced?

77. Why was the public not informed who found the video and when?

78. Why according to MONITOR magazine, were the most controversial statements translated incorrectly?

79. Why was the video released?

80. Who gave the final decision to release it?

81. Why is the Bin Laden video of June 2001 in which he praised the attack, available on the Internet?

82. What about Bin Laden's statements on Al-Jazeera in June 2001 about the bombing of USS Cole, which are similar to the statements on the November 2001 home video?

83. Why did Bin Laden state in Umman Magazine in Sept. 2001, that he was not involved in the WTC?

84. Is Bin Laden still on the payroll of the CIA or ISI?

85. Did the Bin Laden Group Inc. help build ToraBora with the CIA?

86. What was the purpose of the meeting with General Pervez Musharraf in May 2001?

87. Why was a statement released that Al-Khalifa bin Laden, who is not the mother of Bin Laden, had a telephone call with Bin Laden on September 9, rather than Alia Ghanem, his mother? Why did Alia Ghanem say she did not believe he planned the attack?

ANTHRAX AND MICROBIOLOGIST DEATHS

100. What happened on September 18th, when an employee of Batelle Memorial Institute was involved in a so-called anthrax hoax on that day? Was he arrested?

101. Why did the investigation of that case begin in December 2001?

102. What was in the memo of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a public health consumer advocate and author of "Death in the Air" on October 1, 2001, almost two weeks before the first anthrax letter was sent from Trenton to the American media building in Boca Raton?

103.What about his letter of Nov. 13 in which he claimed that BAYER is behind the anthrax infections?

104. Did US BioDefense laboratories send the anthrax-laced letters to get a new budget for research?

105. What about the statement of former UN-weapons inspector of Iraq, Richard Spertzel, who told ABC, "...he knows only five scientists in the USA who would be in the situation to produce such a fine, highly developed spore material"?

106. Why did it take 48 hours to inform Bob Stevens that he had anthrax?

107. Why were envelopes never found near Bob Stevens, Amelie Lundgren and Mia Nguyen?

108. How come Microsoft got a hoax anthrax letter from Malaysia on the same day that President Bush said Malaysia might be one of the next targets of the United States?

109. Why did the FBI never investigate the case Don Wiley, a Bioscientist who disappeared 11/13/01?

110. Why did the FBI begin to investigate after his body was found on December 22, 300 miles away? Was there an investigation at the military hydro plant where workers found him? Why did the media write different versions about how, when and where he was found? Why did the police report change 2 months later from suicide to an accident?

111. What was the goal of Bioport in 1997?

112.Did development of anti-anthrax vaccines begin in 1998?

113.When did Bioport decide to produce anthrax vaccines?

114. Was it before or after Sept. 1998 that Admiral Crowe was put in charge of investigations of the August 7, 1998 bombings of Embassy Nairobi and Embassy Dar Es Salaam?

115. Did the schedule for developing anti-anthrax vaccines begin starting in 1998?

116. When did the US Government ask Bayer for help in developing a vaccine?

117. When did Bayer start sending the vaccines to the U.S.?

118. When did Bayer double production of the vaccines?

119. Was the death of Vladimir Pasechnik investigated? He was former director of the Institute of Ultra Pure Biochemical Preparations of the Soviet bio-warfare establishment Biopreparat in November 2001?

120. How are the deaths of scientists Robert M. Schwartz, Dr. Benito Que and Set Van Nguyen explained since all occurred in the same month? Is Set van Nguyen related to the anthrax victim Mia Nguyen?

121. What about the death of Nancy Sonnenfeld (FEMA-Wife)?

122. Why was the NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife examining Anthrax in August 2000?

123. Do any employees in Trenton have the same handwriting as printed on the Anthrax envelopes?

124. Is it just a coincidence that the laboratory is also based in Trenton?

125. Did the FBI ever ask Fort Detrick to examine anthrax spores?

126. What about the list of 15-20 labs (maintained by Barbara Rosenzweig) who used Fort Detrick spores?

127. Does the CIA have spores different from those at Fort Detrick?

128. Why did Tommy Thompson, The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and other Bush cabinet members meet secretly (i.e. illegally) in Oct. 2001 with officials of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) to develop plans for their Emergency Preparedness Task Force?

129. Why did he decide on October 25, 2001 to ask Congress for another $500 million to produce Acambis's smallpox vaccine?

130. Why did it take 4.5 hours until Jean Marie Malecki , Director Palm Beach County Health Department, picked up the phone for employees of the AMI-Building, Boca Raton. This is where editor Bob Stevens got anthrax. Why did she wait two days before she visited that building again?

131. Did Walter Gilbert, Director Myriad Genetics ever get official permission from relatives of those killed at WTC to examine their DNA?

FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES

150. Why did General Mahmud Ahmad, former head of the ISI quit his position?

151. Why did retaliation against the Taliban begin the day he stepped down?

152. Who in the ISI paid $100.000 to Mohammad Atta?

153. Why does Ahmad think that another secret service was involved in the WTC attack? Which Secret Service was he referring to? Did other ISI official's believe that? Did officials of the CIA believe that? Did some officials of the Mossad believe that?

154. What was the purpose of Ahmad's visit to Washington on 9/11?

155. Who told Russian Foreign Minister Ivanov to abort an air strike against Afghanistan in May 2000?

156. Did Russian intelligence notify the CIA in 2001 that 25 terrorist pilots had been training for suicide missions, as reported in the Russian press?

KISSINGER 1. What did Kissinger mean that an "outside threat from beyond", a "world government" and "individual rights" who are "willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted", what you mentioned in 1991 on a Bilderberg Conference?

2. What was his role at UNOCAL?

3. Is he in contact with representatives of these companies or institutions:

4. What did he discuss at the Bilderberg meeting last year in May 2001?

5. What was the purpose of his meeting with Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov in July 2001?

6. Why does he write in "Toward a New Diplomacy for the 21st Century" that America doesn't need a Foreign Policy?

7. When was the last time Henry Kissinger met US-Ambassador in Pakistan, Robert Oakley?

THE PURCHASE OF AIRLINE PUT OPTIONS

1. Is it true that the CIA is in possession of PROMIS software?

2. What is the purpose of PROMIS?

3. Did A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, CIA, own any stocks of United Airlines, American Airlines, Merrill Lynch,

4. Morgan Stanley, AXA Re (insurance) which owns 25% of American Airlin