![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
|
Nice Doc. I am not a racer, heck I'm not even fast. But I am a numbers Geek. I like it. Let me ask you a question, Doc - I am 40 years old and have been cycling justs over two years. No seriously structured training. I am 195 (down from 255 3 years ago). Last year, on some pretty good little hills in Clermont, FL, I saw 188 on my heart rate monitor. Another day, I sprinted up a little hill at the halfway point of a 30 mile ride and saw 187. However, I have not seen anything close to that in over a year - even when I sprint at the end of a hard ride. How do I explain this as MHR is a constant fgure as I understand it?
__________________
"I'm GatorTrek and I approved this message." |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,781
|
Quote:
From what I understand, once you get into better shape your MaxHR will actually drop a little bit. Also it does drop with age, but not as quickly when one stays fit as when they are/were a couch potato. So MaxHR is not a fixed value over time. I haven't done a MaxHR test in a couple of years so I don't even know if the number I'm using is accurate or not. However, being a few beats off isn't going to have a real world impact on training in most zones. A few beats variance is more than acceptable as using HR is just a ball park figure anyway. It's not as though training at 70% vs 72% MaxHR is going to have any profound impact on the physiological adaptations that take place from training. It just doesn't work like that. Summer heat can cause one to be in a higher zone just because the body is trying to work harder to keep cool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
Thanks, Doc. I had heard MHR was fixed but I had suspected that I might never see those figures again. I am using 182 as MHR based upon the second formula on the tope of your spreadsheet. I know that gets me very close if not exact for MHR so that I can base my training zones on that. Yesterday I did a section of incline at a sustained 176 for about two minutes. Believe me, I am no Floyd Landis. It hurt and I was glad when it was over. But afterward I always say to myself, "that wasn't so bad, you're a wimp!" Thanks for the insight.
__________________
"I'm GatorTrek and I approved this message." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Hoosier State
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
__________________
I Am "The Amazing Shrinking Man" ![]() Drop by my blog to understand! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,781
|
Quote:
I've wanted to add some other coaches' zones and data but haven't had the time. Also, I have had computer issues lately but that's getting resolved via some new upgrades. Oh, and where in Indiana do you live? I'm not too far from Brownsburg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Hoosier State
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
__________________
I Am "The Amazing Shrinking Man" ![]() Drop by my blog to understand! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,781
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
|
thank you so much!!!
__________________
Missing the empty roads in Indiana... |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Registered User
|
Thanks Doc! Good work.
Cheers WrxAnt |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 112
|
I don't know why you say it's obsolete technology. It's what most people use who can't afford $2000 for a power tap. I haven't read anything seriously suggesting HR training isn't still a highly efficient trainting method.
And you summed it up perfectly for all the major coaches. I don't think you need to get permission from the various authors/coaches to use their training zones as long as you reference where you got them from and you don't make any money off of your program. Are you planning to add Chris Carmichael's zone's as well? I read his book a while ago and thought he had some good ideas. ... Thanks again for a great HR calculator |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,781
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 112
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 36
|
HR Zones can only accurately give you a training guide for Aerobic training. When you do an interval that is hard, your body and HR can not imediatelly respond. It is here when you are using your anaerobic system that your HR becomesmore irrelevent.
__________________
BIKE COACH Cycle Coaching From Beginners...to Elite Athletes W: www.bikecoach.com.au E: chris@bikecoach.com.au |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 113
|
Nice spread sheet. I'm an analyst, work with numbers all day long and live on excel...nice compellation. Please let us know when the final corrected version is up. I have a brother that is just learning to train with an HR and I would love for him to see this.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,781
|
Quote:
Glad you liked it. |
|
|
|
|