Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


The Greenspan Depression?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 29-08.-2007, 03:56 AM   #31
Hein-Verbruggen
Banned
 
Hein-Verbruggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Guam
Posts: 188
Thumbs up Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Lim:

Really. Wake up and smell the fraud. No need to reach back to Michael Milken and LBOs gone bad. Plenty of active crooks operating now. Just lik doping in sports---fraud has ALWAYS been active at all times.

Wall Street has a history all right. Every firm cheats to some degree.
Audit profession has a history too--every public CPA firm cheats too.
Corporate lawyers aid (mask) the cheating in exchange for big fees.
Bribing University Dept Heads to write flattering articles for industry.

Without cheating--there would be no need for:
1) Grand Cayman off shore tax-free accounts
2) fake audits
3) hedge funds devoid of disclosure rules
4) SPE (special purpose entities)
5) risk dumping junk paper into funds w/o accounting valuation rules (mark-to-market)
6) DOJ discourgement deals with KPMG and a $600 MILLION fine for tax evasion schemes
7) Harvard MBAs dominating Enron's finance department
8) leveraged CDOs Hedge Funds of Funds (Bear Stearns)
9) Goldman & Sachs
10) Mother Merrill
11) The NYSE black box of skimming

In TV-based sport--the financial conflict (leading to fraud) is the athlete endorsement, event underwriters and TV rights all owned by the same party--or related parties. That my friend is known as a 'FIXED OUTCOME EVENT"

Many parallels between cheating in the Capital Markets and Cheating to win a TDF or an Olympic Gold Medal. Same work ethic.



Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Some of this is on topic.
Other parts are factually incorrect Hein.





hein : deliberate policy of low interest rates by the Fed - resulted in cheap credit.
Banks fought for market share and thus loaned money recklessly.
Low interest rates/cheap credit : everything else that followed is built on that
reckless policy.








Hein - I never suggested that CDO's were invented by Greenspam or Bernie.





No disagreement there either, Hein.

Wall St has a history : Drexel Burnham etc.




Fraud would suggest that there was an intent to deceive from inception.
This sub-prime crisis was never an issue of fraud : this crisis inception is as a result of incompetence with regard to interest rate policy at the Fed AND
the loaning of cheap money to people who did not have the wherewithall to repay that money.
Q.E.D.

Last edited by Hein-Verbruggen : 29-08.-2007 at 04:08 AM.
Hein-Verbruggen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 06:25 AM   #32
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,222
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
The abandonment of mortgage rules is the result of the creation of cheap credit.
Not the other way around.

I disagree--sort of. The two are somewhat disconnected. The abandonment of mortgage standards could have occurred without cheap money, but in this case the profits derived from cheap money acted as an incentive for relaxation once the low hanging fruit from cheap credit had been picked.

In the U.S. there has been a two step process. More accurately it was a series of small steps, but it is easier to discuss if it is envisioned as two steps. The first was AG lowering interest rates and keeping them there for far too long. The cheap money inflated the value of assets, the easiest of which to see was housing prices. This would have had ill effects, as a credit bubble always has.

The second step was massive fraud that came about due to complete lack of oversight and regulation. The easy credit created a boom in the lending industry. People were macking it hard, the people at the bottom with commissions and the people at the top with bonuses and stock grants. This would have ended much earlier than it did, resulting in a smaller bubble, but the industry moved to fraud as a way to keep the spigot flowing. There was a steady progression of ever more risky loan products being created and the industry dug further and further in the barrel. They started scraping the bottom early this year.

The current crop of bankrupt lenders and hedge fund implosions are not due to cheap money. These are the companies and funds that were taking the most risk, they knew exactly what they were doing, and they are just the first dominos to fall. They were killed because of fraud. The bankruptcies that come about and could be said to be primarily from cheap money instead of fraud will come later in the cycle.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 06:38 AM   #33
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
I disagree--sort of. The two are somewhat disconnected. The abandonment of mortgage standards could have occurred without cheap money, but in this case the profits derived from cheap money acted as an incentive for relaxation once the low hanging fruit from cheap credit had been picked.



The low interest rates - cheap money - required banks to compete to extend their loan books in order to secure more and more business.

CDO's, various financial instruments derived ultimately from the policy of cheap money.
Waiving the regulations - not checking peoples ability to repay - were all products of cheap money.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 07:13 AM   #34
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,222
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
The low interest rates - cheap money - required banks to compete to extend their loan books in order to secure more and more business.

CDO's, various financial instruments derived ultimately from the policy of cheap money.
Waiving the regulations - not checking peoples ability to repay - were all products of cheap money.

I agree with the first statement but as for the last, I guess it depends on what the definition of "product" is. My chief point is this: Even though the Fed pursued a policy of easy money after the dot com collapse, the goverment could have mitigated the effects by effective regulation. The disciples of Milton Friedman, of which Greenspan was one, are at fault for the extent of the damage.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 08:04 AM   #35
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

I'm not disagreeing with you : the banks took risks when offering loans.
And banks who bought CDO's, based upon those loans, were taking even greater risks when purchasing these instruments.

All they were interested in was getting a return.

Derivatives, financial instruments etc : this whole area is a mindfield.
There is no clarity to any of it.

It's the poor bugger who took out the loan from the bank and who's nowbeing foreclosed that I feel sorry for.

It's the people who placed their pensions with financial institutions who invested in these "instruments" - who's pension value could now be zero - that I feel sorry for.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 08:53 AM   #36
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,222
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
Derivatives, financial instruments etc : this whole area is a mindfield.
There is no clarity to any of it.

Yup. Warren Buffet has been calling for derivatives to be reigned in for years. There is a huge systemic risk that no one really understands. It violates the principle of transparency that should exist in an efficient market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
It's the poor bugger who took out the loan from the
bank and who's nowbeing foreclosed that I feel sorry for.

Some innocent people will be hurt. In many cases the home owners are far from innocent. They were part of the fraud. They inflated their income with liar loans, they took out ARM/interest only mortgages thinking they would make minimal payments and sell for a large profit in a couple of years, they fooled themselves into buying vacation homes that were really bought for investment purposes, they lied to banks that their investment homes would be owner occupied, etc. There is a large percentage of people I don't feel sorry for at all. I hope they burn.

The people to feel sorry for are the naive and possibly stupid people who were taken advantage of or who did realize what was going on. A couple of weeks ago I had a conversation with a friend who laid out his plans for the next eighteen months. They involved selling his house next Spring, which he had bought recently for the proverbial "$50K under what it was worth", and going to grad school to get an MBA in a year long program. He is not working now because he figures that he is making money from his house. I tried to advise planning for the worst and looking for a job because the housing market is cooling, but he is so convinced that his house is worth $150K or so above what he paid he is not open to discussion. I did not feel like depressing him by telling him he was doomed. I feel sorry about his wife and little daughter.

Then there is my brother's neighbor who has not really worked since he got laid off at the end of the dot com meltdown. He was lucky enough to have bought a vacation condo in a bubble market and his own house has also gone up. Evidently he has spent the last five years living on housing equity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
It's the people who placed their pensions with financial institutions who invested in these "instruments" - who's pension value could now be zero - that I feel sorry for.

A lot of people will be hurt when their "safe" investments evaporate.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30-08.-2007, 09:11 AM   #37
limerickman
Community Team
 
limerickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
Some innocent people will be hurt. In many cases the home owners are far from innocent. They were part of the fraud. They inflated their income with liar loans, they took out ARM/interest only mortgages thinking they would make minimal payments and sell for a large profit in a couple of years, they fooled themselves into buying vacation homes that were really bought for investment purposes, they lied to banks that their investment homes would be owner occupied, etc. There is a large percentage of people I don't feel sorry for at all. I hope they burn.


If it's an consolation we had the same people doing the same thing here.
People who should have known better.

They deliebrately lied on their mortgage application - inflated their pay - to buy the proverbial "holiday home" - which they only occupy for two weeks per year but which they can boast about to their neighbours!
Like you I have no sympathy for them.

But I do have sympathy for the first time buyers who, trying to get their starter home, had to pay over the odds for an asset (house) which was inflated in price because "demand" for houses was high.
They're now being burnt - they're paying more for a value that is falling.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
The people to feel sorry for are the naive and possibly stupid people who were taken advantage of or who did realize what was going on. A couple of weeks ago I had a conversation with a friend who laid out his plans for the next eighteen months. They involved selling his house next Spring, which he had bought recently for the proverbial "$50K under what it was worth", and going to grad school to get an MBA in a year long program. He is not working now because he figures that he is making money from his house. I tried to advise planning for the worst and looking for a job because the housing market is cooling, but he is so convinced that his house is worth $150K or so above what he paid he is not open to discussion. I did not feel like depressing him by telling him he was doomed. I feel sorry about his wife and little daughter.

Then there is my brother's neighbor who has not really worked since he got laid off at the end of the dot com meltdown. He was lucky enough to have bought a vacation condo in a bubble market and his own house has also gone up. Evidently he has spent the last five years living on housing equity.


The old "I can release equity from my home" theme.
We have that here too.
After you've made inroads on the repayment - the bank comes along and says "why not release the difference between the house value and the remaining outstanding balance - to fund a lifestyle choice".
Been happening over here for the past 5 years or so.

Your friend is like a lot of people : they assume that property is a oneway street.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
A lot of people will be hurt when their "safe" investments evaporate.


yeah, I just wonder how much "blue-chip" is really bluechip?
Enron would have been viewed as bluechip at one point.

This is a house of cards.
Problem is that the banks will not, will not, fess up until the horse has well and truly bolted.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF
morelike hypocrisy.
limerickman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 05:12 AM   #38
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Did anyone notice how 2 years ago when the (anti)Bankruptcy Law was passed, that was when subprime loans really took off?
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 09:48 AM   #39
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,222
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Did anyone notice how 2 years ago when the (anti)Bankruptcy Law was passed, that was when subprime loans really took off?

I am sure it was a complete coincidence. We all know that a lender stupid enough to give additional credit cards to people staggering under the weight of their current debt should be protected. It is all the fault of those who take the credit not those who extend it.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 10:13 AM   #40
Hein-Verbruggen
Banned
 
Hein-Verbruggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Guam
Posts: 188
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Excellent example of lack of understanding how the mortgage origination business actually worked over the past ten years.

Banks prefer NOT to carry mortgage loans directly anymore--chosing instead to dump (sell/spin off) the collection risk onto others. (Hedge Funds, CDO, Pension Funds, SIVs, etc...) Paradoxically, many large banks did lend money to these very same hedge funds which, in turn bought CDOs. This is a loan loss accounting problem and a 'mark-to-market' issue.

Interest rates had NOTHING whatsoever to do with loan fraud, no doc applications, stated income, wholesale suspension of underwiting standards.
Liar loans can be made with neg-amortization high rates, or zero interest. No relationship with rates & fraud. They remain different concepts.

The only competition was to find a dishonest hedge fund, which was quite easy to do. Just like finding suckers to root for Team CSC or Lance.

This is NOT a subprime credit crisis, it is a PRIME commercial lending crisis. And that is why all central banlers will intervene with stimuli.

Central banks will bail out these broken credit markets w/o fixing the problem without any rule enforcement.


Quote:
Originally Posted by limerickman
The low interest rates - cheap money - required banks to compete to extend their loan books in order to secure more and more business.

CDO's, various financial instruments derived ultimately from the policy of cheap money.
Waiving the regulations - not checking peoples ability to repay - were all products of cheap money.

Last edited by Hein-Verbruggen : 13-09.-2007 at 10:32 AM.
Hein-Verbruggen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 01:41 PM   #41
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
I am sure it was a complete coincidence. We all know that a lender stupid enough to give additional credit cards to people staggering under the weight of their current debt should be protected. It is all the fault of those who take the credit not those who extend it.


That's what I thought - utter coincidence. The same type of coincidence that keeps medical care excessively high/unaffordable, and why about 1/2 of all non-commercial bankruptcies are medical-related.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 02:06 PM   #42
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,222
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
That's what I thought - utter coincidence. The same type of coincidence that keeps medical care excessively high/unaffordable, and why about 1/2 of all non-commercial bankruptcies are medical-related.
There are a lot of coincidences that occur when the middle class gets robbed. If you did not know better, you might think that corporate crooks were making the laws to benefit their scams. That could never happen in our democracy though. Never, ever, ever.

We all know that an introductory college textbook on physics should cost $150. Even though it has the same Newtonian physics, electromagnetism, and optics that were being taught fifty years ago, and anyone can go to Barnes and Noble to pick up books on the most fringe of subjects for thirty or forty bucks.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates

Last edited by Bro Deal : 13-09.-2007 at 02:44 PM.
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 03:43 PM   #43
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,365
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Bro, those guys have to recover their costs. Do you realize how much bribery they have to partake in to get their book on the recommended text list? Or is this the subtle point that I missed in your post?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
We all know that an introductory college textbook on physics should cost $150. Even though it has the same Newtonian physics, electromagnetism, and optics that were being taught fifty years ago, and anyone can go to Barnes and Noble to pick up books on the most fringe of subjects for thirty or forty bucks.
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-09.-2007, 04:06 PM   #44
Wurm
Registered User
 
Wurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,148
Default Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Hein-V, the Wall-Streeter's are somewhat to blame yes, but I would say that Greenspan has never been seen sporting a halo, (at least not by any of the Great Unwashed):

Quote:
...Amy Gluckman, an editor of Dollars and Sense, reported in the November/December 2006 issue: “During the Clinton administration, Greenspan was relatively ‘unembedded’—averaging only one meeting per month at the White House….

“But when George W. Bush moved into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Greenspan’s behavior changed. During 2001, he averaged 3.3 White House visits a month, more than triple his rate under Clinton and much more often with high-level officials like Vice President Cheney. His visits rose to 4.6 a month in 2002 and 5.7 in 2003.

“Whatever White House officials were whispering in Greenspan’s ear, it worked: Greenspan abruptly changed his tune on tax cuts, lending critical support to Bush’s massive 2001 and 2003 tax giveaways, and he loosened the reins by cutting Fed-controlled interest rates repeatedly beginning in January 2001, a gift to the Republicans in power.”

...


http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6239

and,

Quote:
...The underlying problem is not simply the Fed’s reckless increases to the money supply, but the growing “wealth gap” which is undermining solid economic growth. If wages don’t keep pace with productivity; the middle class loses its ability to buy consumer items and the economy slows.

The reason that hasn’t happened yet in the US is because of the extraordinary opportunities to expand personal debt. The Fed’s low interest rates have created a culture of borrowing which has convinced many people that debt equals wealth. It’s not; and the collapse in the housing market will prove how lethal that theory really is.

To large extent, the housing bubble has concealed the systematic destruction of America’s industrial and manufacturing base. Low interest rates have lulled the public to sleep while millions of high-paying jobs have been outsourced. The rise in housing prices has created the illusion of prosperity but, in truth, we are only selling houses to each other and are not making anything that the rest of the world wants. The $11 trillion dollars that was pumped into the real estate market is probably the greatest waste of capital investment in the nations’ history. It hasn't produced a single asset that will add to our collective wealth or industrial competitiveness. It’s been a total bust.

The Federal Reserve produces all the facts and figures related to the housing industry. They knew that trillions of dollars were being diverted into a speculative bubble, but they did nothing to stop it. Instead, they kept interest rates low and endorsed the lax lending standards which paved the way for millions of defaults. Now the effects of their "cheap money" policies have spread to the hedge fund industry where hundreds of billions of dollars in pensions and savings are in jeopardy.

Alan Greenspan played a major role in the housing boondoggle. On February 26, 2004, he said, “American consumers might benefit if lenders provide greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed rate mortgage. To the degree that households are driven by fears of payment shocks but willing to manage their own interest-rate risks, the traditional fixed-rate mortgage may be an expensive method of financing a home.”

Greenspan tacitly approved the whacky financing which produced all manner of untested loans—including ARMs, piggyback loans, “no doc” loans, “interest only” loans etc. These loans are a break from traditional financing and have contributed to the increase in bankruptcies.

Millions of people who were hoodwinked into buying homes with “interest-only”, “no down” loans will now either lose their homes or be shackled to an asset of decreasing value for the next 30 years. They've been tricked into a life of indentured servitude.

...


http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6209

...with a bit of help from the (anti)Bankruptcy Law of 2005 of course, which Greenspan AND Wall Street well knew was going to shift the onus from the predatory lenders to the under-compensated worker/credit-maxxed consumer.

So! Easy credit for all and a chicken in every pot.

Until the sh!t hits the fan and you find that the Fed now won't let you wipe the slate clean through bankruptcy, but they WILL be nice enough to let you spend the rest of your life paying it off.

A great scheme, as long as you're not on the wrong end.
__________________
"Bush is the first President to admit to an impeachable offense."

- John Dean, former Counsel to the President (Nixon)

The aim of big corporations is to separate fools from their money all of the time and ordinary folks from their money most of the time. The rest of us must fend for ourselves.
Wurm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-09.-2007, 02:12 AM   #45
Hein-Verbruggen
Banned
 
Hein-Verbruggen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Guam
Posts: 188
Thumbs up Re: The Greenspan Depression?

Greenspan did not invent Wall Street steroids and Hedge Funds:

Neither did he scream or yell about them.

CDOs, SIVs, SPEs, dishonesty, hedge fund secrecy, Big Bank/Broker/HF partnering, lack of disclosure, waived underwriting, neg-amortization balloon loans, speculation, greed and off-shore banking lead to this global lack of trust (credit crisis). These methods undermine central banking power.

The commercial credit market is broken. Now the economy is at risk.

Major stimulation is required. By many means.

Audits, regulations were never in the mix--and they won't help now. It would be nice to have trust in the future---but that is like wishing for clean (drug free) cycling. It just won't happen.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurm
Hein-V, the Wall-Streeter's are somewhat to blame yes, but I would say that Greenspan has never been seen sporting a halo, (at least not by any of the Great Unwashed):



http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6239

and,



http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6209

...with a bit of help from the (anti)Bankruptcy Law of 2005 of course, which Greenspan AND Wall Street well knew was going to shift the onus from the predatory lenders to the under-compensated worker/credit-maxxed consumer.

So! Easy credit for all and a chicken in every pot.

Until the sh!t hits the fan and you find that the Fed now won't let you wipe the slate clean through bankruptcy, but they WILL be nice enough to let you spend the rest of your life paying it off.

A great scheme, as long as you're not on the wrong end.
Hein-Verbruggen is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet