![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sean Kelly land
Posts: 53
|
im a 19 year old rider who has been racing on and off for about 4 years. i have always been self-trained as i feel i have a good grasp of how my body reacts to different training stimuli.
recently I have been thinking about trying to join the professional ranks, so i invested in a copy of 'the lance armstrong performance program' as i have heard people recommend it. i did the field test in slightly over 6 minutes (6:04), which is way below the given "advanced" level of under 8 minutes. nevertheless, i turned to the advanced training program and it just seems INCREDIBLY light compared to the training i have been doing for years. now here are my questions.. can there be any benefit from reducing my mileage so much? i mean an actual training benefit, not a recovery benefit. since my training load already seems so much higher (about 5-10 hours a week higher) than this book recommends, am i in danger of over-training if i increase it much more? is it simply a case that the LAPP is too conservative, and i would be better off with some other guide? finally, and somewhat related to the last point, i have an option to pay 40 euros a month to be coached by a soon-to-be ex professional with one year's experience in training, is this something i should grab with both hands or be wary about? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
what level are you racing at right now? what results have you had? Do you have any power data? what is your current weekly training look like? How much of that is racing? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sean Kelly land
Posts: 53
|
im a 3rd cat right now. although i could have been a 2, when i transitioned from junior i knew i could only do a couple of races this year so i stayed a 3.
ive been averaging about 3 wins a season, out of about 20-25 races per season. ive been in the top 20 of a few international junior stage races. no, i havent had the money to invest in a power meter as of yet, i train by heart-rate. my current weekly schedule is completely unstructured. i basically train according to however i feel in the morning, and none of this is racing. however, my more normal schedule (that is, last year) would be about 15-16 hours of training a week, usually with 2-3 of those being racing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 634
|
Get a coach, get involved in some national team projects. At this time of the year, try to get into some bigger races as a stagiare with more advance team.s
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,487
|
Quote:
As a junior, we were training 12 hours during the week (Monday-Friday). At weekends we would be racing (in summer) or doing training spins (in winter) - on both Saturdays and Sundays : This totals approximately 18 hours per week. Our team had guys on the verge of the national squad for Moscow and LA Olympics. Comparing my total time on the bike (as a junior) to yours, I would suggest that you need to get more hours in either racing and/or training. The old system - which I have tried to re-introduce to my local club when training juniors - was to exceed total mileage per week/month through either racing and/or training. The yearly (racing/training) mileage was 12,000.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF morelike hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sean Kelly land
Posts: 53
|
i average about 31 km/hr in training, so 15 hours of that per week for 48 weeks of the year = 22,320k's, or close to 14,000 miles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
|
Columbia,
If you want to race pro, then I think you should start looking at how the pros race and train(and basically live). Now I'm not saying that you should train like one right now, but what I'm saying is they do pretty much every thing they can in their lives to ride at their maximum potential. That generally means coaching, lots of races(traveling to who knows where), periodization, power meters (these days), dialed-in nutrition, and probably other stuff us pack fodder haven't even heard about yet! It's a 24-hour-a-day job. It's good you got the book. Keep reading training books and any research you can find. Educate yourself on the sport. And get help from people who know what they are doing. I know that coaches are expensive. I've never had one. And a friend of mine, a strong Cat 1, hasn't either(makes me wonder "what if"). But it might be something worth working a part-time job for at your age.... Making the decision to turn pro is a BIG commitment. I encourage you to go for it. Good luck and stick with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
To get where you want to be you definitely need a coach. The Lance Armstrong book is for schmucks and beginners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 523
|
That book isn't for someone of your ability. You need a coach, and you need to race a lot more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sean Kelly land
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
thank you, this was great advice..not that i dont appreciate everyones comments here recently i have been living like the university student i am, instead of the pro cyclist i want to be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
1. Get in touch with your National Cycling Federation and find out what programs or club(s) in particular you should be involved with. 2. Don't just get any old coach get someone who's well connected, scientifically knowledgeble and experienced enough to get you where you need to be so you don't end up wasting time. 3. Don't lose focus on your studies coz there's no guarantees you'll make. 4. Like the other fellas have said keep training and loose the Armstrong book its really for weekend warriors and time constrained oldies who aren't seriously competitive. 5. Learn how to win more races and people will start to notice you. Plus it will look good on your Palmares 6. Do your research, find out what good amateur DS's and pro DS's are looking for. Is it just race results, impressive wattage outputs etc etc Good luck dude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
+1 Well said, especially 2 and 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 467
|
Quote:
very few people decide to go pro. Pro teams decide to offer you a contract. To be noticed by pro teams you have to win lots of amateur races at top level. To get on a european team that means coming over here and riding as many elite level races as possible. here in Holland there are hundreds of elite amateurs, and (with the exception of the Rabobank development squad who have been earmarked as future pros since the juniors) each year only 2/3 get a pro contract. Of those 2/3 probably only 1 gets a second contract. There are amateurs here who rack up 20+ victories a season, and place ahead of many good pros when theire teams are "wildcarded" in pro races. They still don't get a pro contract though. basically it's a lot harder than "deciding" to go pro and training 20 hrs a week, or having a VO2 max of 85, or an FT of 395w.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL, USA
Posts: 679
|
Bullgod, your response should be printed out and hung on the wall of everyone who dreams of "turning pro", particularly students who are trying to decide what to do with the next 10 years of their life.
And what is so great about a career in pro cycling anyway? The average pro rider in Europe makes what, $30K euros/year? Considering the risk of injury, pain and career longevity, and just plain beating yourself up all the time, it's not much of a way to make a living....even for the 1/1000 elite who get there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
When you win a race at the highest level of the sport... I wish I could even imagine what that is like. It's not often a lifestyle choice or a financial decision. For the people that make it... who cares what you get paid? Bullgod: If you have a VO2max of 85 and an FT of 395 and you are under 23 (or not TOO much older), you are extremely likely be offered a contract unless you are a dickhead, have no passion for racing or have the worst bike handling skills known to man. And even then... a good director would get you under control and turn you into a great rider. The problem isn't so much that it isn't about the numbers (although they aren't the only thing). The problem is that for many people it can take a lifetime of work and they still won't get those numbers. By my calculations, that VO2 and FT would put you at 70.5kg, about 5.6W/kg. If you are reasonably young, that is a very good foundation to build off. Typical numbers for a good young pro. Maybe not protour, but strong enough to ride pro, and definitely with a shot at making it protour. The thing is, there might be hundreds or thousands of amateurs trying to make it around the world. Only a handful of them get those numbers. |
|
|
|
|