Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 23-10.-2007, 04:07 PM   #31
Porkyboy
Registered User
 
Porkyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northumberland. UK
Posts: 127
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Rob

Quote:
Originally Posted by mullerrj
PB..my apologies..I have a habit of misunderstanding questions at time. Glad to see you got your question answered. Regards Rob
No problem at all, if anything I'm the worst offender when it comes to that

Cheers.

PB
__________________
What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man!
Visit My Training Weblog
Porkyboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-10.-2007, 02:01 PM   #32
sidewind
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 138
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Simmons
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?
__________________
These are layman's opinions, expressed in language no self-respecting scientist woul be using.
sidewind is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-10.-2007, 02:08 PM   #33
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewind
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?


This probably isn't the whole answer... but I'll give it a shot. Maybe Ric, Andy or Alex can chime in and correct me or add to my thoughts.

1. In addition to the physiological things listed, there is a neuromuscular component to fatigue at all levels... not just sprinting. Neuromuscular improvements are seen only when training at specific joint angles and velocities. Thus the crossover between cycling and running is limited.

2. Running requires muscles adapt to very high eccentric forces (esp running downhill) and hence fatigue muscles more and reduce the specificity of the exercise.

3. Even when attempting steady state efforts, cycling is fairly stochastic in terms of energy demands (you go hard up little hills, etc). This may not be the case running (I don't really know), but would also influence the specificity and the level of crossover.

I actually like my neuromuscular theory... a lot of good middle distance runners I've seen crossover take a while to adapt to cycling (3-12 months), but then are very fit and fast. Or they are fit (they climb) but they are too sketchy in bunches to be bike racers.
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-10.-2007, 12:46 AM   #34
acoggan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewind
In the "Table 2 - Expected physiological/performance adaptations resulting from training at levels 1-7:" There are listed lot of adaptations, but none of them seem to be cycling specific, wouldn't eg training by running at similar intensities bring the same kind of adaptations into mitochondria, enzymes etc? But, has the adaptations which make cyclist a cyclist and runner a runner listed somewhere? Which training intensities are related with those adaptations?


1. Training specificity is related to the mode of exercise, not the intensity.

2. Who cares about running/runners?
acoggan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-10.-2007, 01:31 AM   #35
john979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 215
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Back to the original topic. Both my FTP and VO2 max peaks are produced when my base consisted of a large volume of L3 training in the winter. Since I don't have multiple hours to train during the week, that rules out longer L2 rides. OTOH, when in the past I added in too much L4 training, my FTP peaked early and did not rise much thereafter.
john979 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-10.-2007, 11:06 PM   #36
rmur17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 929
Default Re: Any reason to train at L2 or L3?

Quote:
Originally Posted by john979
Back to the original topic. Both my FTP and VO2 max peaks are produced when my base consisted of a large volume of L3 training in the winter. Since I don't have multiple hours to train during the week, that rules out longer L2 rides. OTOH, when in the past I added in too much L4 training, my FTP peaked early and did not rise much thereafter.

wrt. to the bolded comment, would you mind describing a typical week that worked well for you and one that did not (too much L4?). I'm interested in the volume of L4 in relation to total weekly volume and the intensity and format of the L4 workouts themselves.

If you use PMC, an idea of CTL at various phase is also of interest or a chart of course.
__________________
rmur
rmur17 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet