Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


More power or less weight? Which is better?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 27-09.-2007, 03:37 AM   #1
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 441
Default More power or less weight? Which is better?

Hey everyone.

This question has been causing quite a quandry in my mind. I've vacillated with this query for some time now (about a year) and have come to the conclusion that I MUST lose weight (about 5kgs down to 80kgs) in order to be competitive on the road here in British Columbia. Because I'm relatively new to the cycling scene (6/06 got my first road bike) I'm still in the mindset that I want to be pretty good at all the disciplines - road races, crits, time trials, track racing. I've had some decent results in all the disciplines this past season, but I want to really turn it up a notch or two for 2008 and get an upgrade to Cat. 3 on the road and be able to dictate the outcome of race rather than endure it.

I'm coming from a background of American football so I have fast twitch muscles in great abundance, couple that with the fact that I naturally have a low body fat percentage (~4% at 85kgs), I have really struggled in trying to lose weight since I've got to this point. I'm basically embarking on trying to lose muscle that took 20+ years to build (I'm 40 now and when I got on my road bike I was 96kgs). What's been working for me the past month is keeping track of EVERYTHING I eat and making a balance sheet of input versus expenditure. I'm seeing good, albeit slow, results.

So, for I what I want to achieve (good all-arounder in all disciplines) how do you guys feel - everything else being equal, is it more important for one to lose weight (but keep same or a little less power), or would it be more advantageous for a cyclist to try and improve his power (but at the same weight or a little more)? Both serve the purpose to improve the almighty power to weight ratio, but is one more effective than the other????

FYI, my FTP at present is in the low 340s and this is with very limited focused Level 4 work.
tonyzackery is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 03:58 AM   #2
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,464
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyzackery
...So, for I what I want to achieve (good all-arounder in all disciplines) how do you guys feel - everything else being equal, is it more important for one to lose weight (but keep same or a little less power), or would it be more advantageous for a cyclist to try and improve his power (but at the same weight or a little more)?...FYI, my FTP at present is in the low 340s....
Do you think dropping 5 kg is a realistic goal or would it leave you anorexic? If you think 80 kg is a reasonable and healthy weight for you then definitely drop the excess, especially if your races have substantial climbing(seems likely in BC). Dropping 5 kg and holding your FTP at 340 watts brings you from 4 w/kg to 4.3 w/kg. Keeping your weight the same at 85 kg means you'd have to get your FTP up to 365 watts for the same net result. Ideally you'll keep working of FTP and do both. If you were purely working on time trials and flat events it might be a tossup, but it's sure been easier for me to drop weight than to add watts to my FTP. To a point that is, I got down to 70kg and even down to 69kg for a while this season and power stayed steady or even increased a bit but I leveled out there and think I would have had to do some serious dieting to get much lower. I doubt my FTP would have continued to climb if I'd gone into serious calorie restriction mode mid season.

Anyway, I'd definitely work on dropping a few kilos and I'd do most of it during your winter base work so you can eat a stable diet and refuel yourself during the season. Is 80 kg a good target for you, hard to say. Only you know whether that's reasonable or if you can go even further but I'd definitely try to drop weight if you can safely do so.

Good luck,
Dave
daveryanwyoming is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 04:05 AM   #3
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,646
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

The 2 most obvious answers would be:
1) both together
and then
2) whichever one you feel you could change by the larger amount

Beyond those, increasing power will help in every racing discipline that you could engage in, whereas dropping weight only helps while riding uphill or trying to accelerate quickly. I'd give the edge to increasing power for that reason. There are lots of races where big guys are just as competitive.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 04:27 AM   #4
acoggan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,592
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

If you're really only 4% body fat then it is highly unlikely that you can lose any additional mass w/o seeing your absolute power actually decline. Your climbing may still benefit from an increase in power/mass, but other aspects of your performance may very well go backwards.
acoggan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 04:33 AM   #5
daveryanwyoming
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,464
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan
If you're really only 4% body fat...
Yow! Missed that part
daveryanwyoming is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 04:41 AM   #6
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 441
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Thanks for the replies thus far, gentlemen.

The reason I've targeted weight loss as my primary goal is due to the fact I have an abundance of upper body muscle (chest and back) that is of absolutely no benefit to me while cycling. I realize one can not necessarily target weight loss but I'm willing to sacrifice (in the short term) some leg mass to get the accompanying loss of mass in my upper body. I'm hypothesizing that I can regain the leg mass/power after I've lost the desired amount of upper body muscle. Am I on the right track??

The road races in the BC area definitely are of the hilly variety and while I can presently power up a hill with the smaller guys, it's the repeatability that is giving me a hard time.

Body fat percentage was measured with a computerized machine similar to an MRI machine. It provided a total body scan (lean mass, fat mass, bone mass, bone density, etc). Can't recall the name, but the test was comprehensive and almost as accurate as a dunk test.
tonyzackery is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 05:03 AM   #7
Lionfish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 79
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

As a 225lb powerlifter I will say Leg strength can obliterate a smaller rider in some areas. I can out sprint a 155lb friend on flats, downhills & shorter climbs.

Problem is on longer climbs (or rides for that matter), I burn out due to the extra upper body muscle that my heart & lungs has to try to feed therefore my heart rate skyrockets as he casually passes me. Smaller guys have better cardio which is what's needed in distance cycling.

Needless to say I won't be doing any double centurys anytime soon.
Lionfish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 05:24 AM   #8
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,646
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyzackery
...I have an abundance of upper body muscle (chest and back) that is of absolutely no benefit to me while cycling.

Heh, tell that to the "Core Strength" apologists.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 07:37 AM   #9
NM87710
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 55
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenchyge
dropping weight only helps while riding uphill or trying to accelerate quickly.
Just my '02 pesos here but isn't accelerating quickly and/or riding uphill at the crux of most races(TT excl) since that's when the split, break or sprint occurs that ultimately decides the final outcome?
NM87710 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 07:55 AM   #10
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 441
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lionfish
As a 225lb powerlifter I will say Leg strength can obliterate a smaller rider in some areas. I can out sprint a 155lb friend on flats, downhills & shorter climbs.

Problem is on longer climbs (or rides for that matter), I burn out due to the extra upper body muscle that my heart & lungs has to try to feed therefore my heart rate skyrockets as he casually passes me. Smaller guys have better cardio which is what's needed in distance cycling.

Needless to say I won't be doing any double centurys anytime soon.

LOL, needless to say you won't be entering any road races that have even the slightest hill... I will however...
tonyzackery is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 08:57 AM   #11
wiredued
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,159
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

IMHO an increase in power will help you in more ways than a decrease in weight can. The toughest hill I have to ride around here makes a decrease of 10 lbs roughly equal to an increase in power of 24 watts in FTP. But the 24 watts would also be more useful in a flat TT.
__________________
Romans 5:10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. http://www.earnharts.com/html/reala...ecific.asp?id=3
wiredued is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 09:55 AM   #12
frenchyge
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,646
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NM87710
Just my '02 pesos here but isn't accelerating quickly and/or riding uphill at the crux of most races(TT excl) since that's when the split, break or sprint occurs that ultimately decides the final outcome?

I wouldn't put quick accelerations into that category, no. In any case, my point was that while either an increase in power or a decrease in weight will help in the situations you mention, an increase in power will also help with flat TT's and crits.
frenchyge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 09:58 AM   #13
rayhuang
Registered User
 
rayhuang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 524
Send a message via AIM to rayhuang
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

Wouldnt it be wise to see what power to weigh ratio you desire or require and then calculate how much weigh loss it would take to achieve it then what increase in watts to also achieve it? Although the answer is obvious I 'll say it anyways, I am sure its a bit of both.

I too am very early in my development of ftp and I have easily lost 31 lbs. But since hitting my current weight, I am finding it very difficult to budge the last 5 lbs I want to lose (and I dont have much if any excess upper body mass. So I for one have to increase watts more than lose weight. 5 lbs lost and 36 more watts would make me near unbeatable in the State TT. Both will be very hard to achieve anytime soon.

Ray
__________________
My Blog: http://raysracingadventures.blogspot.com/
rayhuang is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 01:41 PM   #14
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 441
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

I appreciate the replies thus far although there doesn't appear to be a consensus. Because I'm relatively early in the development of FTP, it could be possible I could have both (having my cake and eating it...). Time will tell...

At present, with the weight loss that has already occurred I subjectively feel I indeed have lost some power, but I have not tested this.

I will also add that the road racing is going to be my primary focus next year (I take my sprinting ability in crits for granted as my muscle composition is predominantly type 2 muscle fibers and my neuromuscular power is very good - power profile slopes downward). Ergo, going well in the hilly road races is going to be of utmost importance. I believe the weight loss should be my primary focus...
tonyzackery is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-09.-2007, 11:05 PM   #15
dazman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 66
Default Re: More power or less weight? Which is better?

If I had 4% body fat I would be well pleased so maybe not qualified to give advice, but.. As a stronger person, have you checked your power profile against cadence? I'm a bigger rider and I found the one thing that gave me the most improvement in the last season was moving away from the 90 rpm target to more like 60. My hr is much more controllable on the climbs when I let the muscles do the work rather than cadence. I don't worry about the flats anymore because we have a good advantage there!

Another thing I've noticed - If you'r really putting the miles in, unfortunately all the muscles you don't need fall off(upper body)! I say unfortunately becuase it's still nice to look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyzackery
I appreciate the replies thus far although there doesn't appear to be a consensus. Because I'm relatively early in the development of FTP, it could be possible I could have both (having my cake and eating it...). Time will tell...

At present, with the weight loss that has already occurred I subjectively feel I indeed have lost some power, but I have not tested this.

I will also add that the road racing is going to be my primary focus next year (I take my sprinting ability in crits for granted as my muscle composition is predominantly type 2 muscle fibers and my neuromuscular power is very good - power profile slopes downward). Ergo, going well in the hilly road races is going to be of utmost importance. I believe the weight loss should be my primary focus...
dazman is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet