Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
02-10.-2007, 10:19 AM
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,743
|
Re: Cyclingpeaks versus Powertap software
Quote:
 When I last had this problem, I bought a 2nd CPU. But if you're travel is long, then you do need a laptop. I'd just download poweragent for free and upload to CP when you get home again. For longer aerobic rides, 2.5sec recording intervals are fine if memory is a constraint. |
|
|
|
|
02-10.-2007, 12:02 PM
|
#17 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
|
Re: Cyclingpeaks versus Powertap software
Quote:
Quote:
Maybe instead of all this altitude & GPS hogwash, we ought to be asking for a USB port on the CPU to quickly empty memory into a flash device. |
||
|
|
|
|
02-10.-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 88
|
Re: Cyclingpeaks versus Powertap software
Quote:
Good. I am not interested in the average until after the ride. I look more to the instantaneous values ... |
|
|
|
|
|
02-10.-2007, 01:07 PM
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 88
|
Re: Cyclingpeaks versus Powertap software
Quote:
How about anyone doing an ultra event that takes 15+ hours?  |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
