![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
But you are referring to cadence under the context of power and related analysis. But cadence by itself, you are not going to argue against the relevance of cadence to cycling technique are you?
__________________
Morphed Bianchi Camaleonte IV 2006, Ridley Damocles 2006, Garmin, Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 255
|
First image is all the cycling I have done this season(same as the one in the earlier post but incl. zeros), 538 hours, avg 73 rpm.
Second image is outdoor cycling, 449 hours, avg 69 rpm. Third image is indoor cycling, 89 hours, avg 94 rpm. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Response to Eldrack: The "low end bulge" is because when I ride at low intensity outside in the rolling terrain around where I live, I keep the cadence low in the short 10-20 % climbs, in order to keep the intensity low. Last edited by POGATA : 09-10.-2007 at 06:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
this is just abput the only post that makes sense.... outside i took all the values I had since all the courses are similar I rounded them out to get a total average cadence of 75.4xxx rpms... i guess thats not too bad for only cycling for 2-3 months spuradicly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
Intensity is a function of power, not cadence. Low cadence can still be high intensity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,617
|
Quote:
Did you include the zeroes from periods of coasting into your average? The answers you got here did. Quote:
It's fine. There's really nothing good or bad about one's cadence. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 255
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|