Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Evangelical Disconnect

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16-08.-2008, 10:52 AM   #406
fscyclist
Registered User
 
fscyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 689
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
Can you elaborate on where I'm wrong?

From Wikipedia on the US Federal Budget....


The Budget of the United States Government is a federal document that the President submits to the U.S. Congress. The President's budget submission outlines funding recommendations for the next fiscal year, which begins on October 1st. Congressional decisions are governed by rules and legislation regarding the federal budget process. House and Senate Budget committees each develop budget resolutions, which provide spending limits for the House and Senate Appropriations Committees' subcommittees, which then approve individual appropriations bills to allocate funding to various federal programs. After Congress approves an appropriations bill, it is sent to the President, who may sign it into law, or may veto it. A vetoed bill is sent back to Congress, which can pass it into law with a two-thirds majority in each chamber. Congress may also combine all or some appropriations bills into an omnibus reconciliation bill. In addition, the President may request and the Congress may pass supplemental appropriations bills or emergency supplemental appropriations bills.
I should've said, You're wrong....kinda. Any spending bill must originate in House of Representatives per our Constitution. Congress has requested that the President submit a proposed budget and may use that as a starting point. The end may look nothing like the proposal, and the executive branch has no budgetary control except that which is given to it by congress. The real power our president has is to veto spending bills put forward by congress. Much of the power also lies with the bureaucrats who lobby for money for their departments.

BTW...I agree with your previous comments that the government has little influence and control over short term fiscal fluctuations such as our current downturn or the tech boom. I do think it has influence over long term economic influences (50+ year trends).
fscyclist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08.-2008, 11:14 AM   #407
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by fscyclist
I should've said, You're wrong....kinda. Any spending bill must originate in House of Representatives per our Constitution. Congress has requested that the President submit a proposed budget and may use that as a starting point. The end may look nothing like the proposal, and the executive branch has no budgetary control except that which is given to it by congress. The real power our president has is to veto spending bills put forward by congress. Much of the power also lies with the bureaucrats who lobby for money for their departments.

BTW...I agree with your previous comments that the government has little influence and control over short term fiscal fluctuations such as our current downturn or the tech boom. I do think it has influence over long term economic influences (50+ year trends).
Obviously as you know, the President has veto power over the budget decided on by Congress. It requires a 2/3 majority to squash a veto. My knowledge of US government is not as extensive as yours. I was always under the impression that the President had significant influence over the budget.

I distinctly remember the Reagan years as being referred to as "Reaganomics". I also remember Dick Cheney being quoted a few years ago as saying words to the effect... "Reagan proved that budget deficits and national debt don't matter". Obviously the first six years of the G.W. Bush Presidency, he had the support of a GOP congress. And even if you remove the war spending... the deficit and burgeoning national debt is still large AFAIK. Did the Dem congress force Reagan to spend more than he wanted to?
__________________



Last edited by Crankyfeet : 16-08.-2008 at 01:06 PM. Reason: speling misstake and added a sentence.
Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08.-2008, 09:28 PM   #408
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect


...
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08.-2008, 04:50 PM   #409
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect


o0o
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08.-2008, 09:13 PM   #410
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by garage sale GT
Oh, you're right. But why stop at 3000? Why not say there have been 10,000,000 deaths from terrorism on domestic soil since the war, instead of none, if you are using make-believe numbers to settle your point?
Ummmm no silly billy. I used your quote of 3000 dead from the twin tower incident...these numbers are not make believe. Go back, re-read and get back to me with a proper response, you missed the point entirely. *sigh*
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08.-2008, 10:52 PM   #411
garage sale GT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono L
Ummmm no silly billy. I used your quote of 3000 dead from the twin tower incident...these numbers are not make believe. Go back, re-read and get back to me with a proper response, you missed the point entirely. *sigh*
Please state your point. What did you mean to say by citing those numbers?

You see, it's just that referring back to the original 3000 doesn't really make any sense. I am sure you'll be plenty sarcastic in your response, but let's see if you can cogently state what the hell you are talking about.

You're right, 3000 sounds bigger than 19. but what's your point?

Oops, I'm doing it. Certain people, you don't argue with.
__________________
Your mouthwash ain't makin' it.

Last edited by garage sale GT : 17-08.-2008 at 11:09 PM.
garage sale GT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 12:59 AM   #412
garage sale GT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crankyfeet
+1. Good point.
Hey cranky, what point?
__________________
Your mouthwash ain't makin' it.
garage sale GT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 07:14 AM   #413
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by garage sale GT
Please state your point. What did you mean to say by citing those numbers?

You see, it's just that referring back to the original 3000 doesn't really make any sense. I am sure you'll be plenty sarcastic in your response, but let's see if you can cogently state what the hell you are talking about.

You're right, 3000 sounds bigger than 19. but what's your point?

Oops, I'm doing it. Certain people, you don't argue with.
I assure you, the feeling is mutual

OK, you said something about how you may have already killed the next 19 osama's in a cave somewhere, then I said well from the other side of the fence, the semptember 11 attacks where the same thing, they were just pre-emptively killing you. So now you gotta get them before they get you and so on and so forth.

Point: Insecure pre-emptive strikes could go on forever couldn't they. But are you really gonna stop the terrorists forever? No. Point in case, where is Osama? Point in case, have the attacks stopped in Iraq?
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 09:15 AM   #414
garage sale GT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono L
I assure you, the feeling is mutual

OK, you said something about how you may have already killed the next 19 osama's in a cave somewhere, then I said well from the other side of the fence, the semptember 11 attacks where the same thing, they were just pre-emptively killing you. So now you gotta get them before they get you and so on and so forth.

Point: Insecure pre-emptive strikes could go on forever couldn't they. But are you really gonna stop the terrorists forever? No. Point in case, where is Osama? Point in case, have the attacks stopped in Iraq?
I'm sorry, I underestimated you. I was not aware we were training terrorists in the world trade center.

Both attacks were violent and deadly, therefore they are the same? That's your point? How are they the same? "well, people died."

Maybe you should look up "pre-emptive" in the dictionary. Neither move was preemptive.

If you can't stop all attacks, then let them train at will?
__________________
Your mouthwash ain't makin' it.

Last edited by garage sale GT : 18-08.-2008 at 09:23 AM.
garage sale GT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 01:20 PM   #415
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by garage sale GT
I'm sorry, I underestimated you. I was not aware we were training terrorists in the world trade center.

Both attacks were violent and deadly, therefore they are the same? That's your point? How are they the same? "well, people died."

Maybe you should look up "pre-emptive" in the dictionary. Neither move was preemptive.

If you can't stop all attacks, then let them train at will?

Just doesn't get it does he cranky?
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 03:49 PM   #416
Crankyfeet
Registered User
 
Crankyfeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono L
Just doesn't get it does he cranky?
He's an argument addict. Just make your point and trust that others will see the logic. The problem is... there is enough of these people that they can elect pricks into government who appeal to "patriotism", "God bless America" and "Terror... terror... ooooohh... terror" to get their mandate from flag-waving evangelic fascist ignoramuses. That in some cases actually carry guns around in their saddle bags while riding their bikes... because they could be killed at anytime. Who think that if they fight terrorists in Iraq... then they will stop them from coming to America. And support US Presidents who think they can "change the world" and be a hero US War President. Who think that invading Iraq because they didn't give up non-existent WMDs is not preemptive war. Not all Americans are like that though. But there are enough sheep who will follow what they're told by their evangelist religious leaders that they can sway an election.

Forget it Jono on some of them seeing the light. But you may affect the opinions of a more worldly thinker who reads your posts. They just don't get it that external opinions are worth a lot more than the opinions of the sheep they mix with on a regular basis. Worth more because they aren't affected by group-think.

Hey garage sale GT... does it worry you that the majority of the world (we're talking majority... which is the concept behind "democracy") is growing in disgust and dislike at the US's unilateral, self-serving, foreign policy? Does it worry you that your unilateral "we don't care ... we'll do it anyway" policies are turning America into a disrespected and disliked Superpower across the globe?

I am a believer in the America that the founding fathers put together. The America under recent neoconservative governance has eroded a lot of those values and goodwill... and a lot of the moral high ground IMO. There's no point in being despised by the rest of the world. Even a first year MBA student could work out that public relations cost-benefit equation.

Eisenhower.. the 34th US president and a US General... warned the American people of the corporate military machine. Unfortunately it seems to have fallen on deaf ears.

The world unfortunately doesn't get a vote in electing the supposed "Leader of the Free World". Please don't be a sap like you were in the 2000 and 2004 elections and not see the forest for the trees. And I am a believer in free enterprise. The fascist administration of the last seven years has been a foreign policy joke... and farked up the fiscal balance sheet of the country as well. Conservative my ass. Unfortunately friends can't bail George W. out like they can his oil companies and baseball teams.

Jono is a smart young Aussie. Don't mock his opinion. It's telling you something.
__________________


Crankyfeet is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-08.-2008, 04:11 PM   #417
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by garage sale GT

If you can't stop all attacks, then let them train at will?
How about you look past the dogmatic realist view here and examine the social and cultural issues that underline the "McWorld vs Jihad" issue (to steal a clever phrase..).

The whole 'attack or be attacked' mentality is great at drumming up patriotism with a sprinkle of scare-mongering but you always seem to end up back at square one, actually at the moment I'd say you've gone back past square one.
What are you going to do? Invade every rogue state and force a liberal democracy upon them? It just doesn't work like that.
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-08.-2008, 07:53 AM   #418
garage sale GT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono L
How about you look past the dogmatic realist view here and examine the social and cultural issues that underline the "McWorld vs Jihad" issue (to steal a clever phrase..).

The whole 'attack or be attacked' mentality is great at drumming up patriotism with a sprinkle of scare-mongering but you always seem to end up back at square one, actually at the moment I'd say you've gone back past square one.
What are you going to do? Invade every rogue state and force a liberal democracy upon them? It just doesn't work like that.
We didn't "attack or be attacked". We were attacked. We were already there.
__________________
Your mouthwash ain't makin' it.

Last edited by garage sale GT : 19-08.-2008 at 07:58 AM.
garage sale GT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-08.-2008, 12:30 PM   #419
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by garage sale GT
We didn't "attack or be attacked". We were attacked. We were already there.

And in Iraq?
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08.-2008, 09:54 PM   #420
Jono L
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Default Re: Evangelical Disconnect

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono L
And in Iraq?

......
__________________
Classic1-
Don't get me started on triathletes. Sluggo wearing, mechanically inept, dirty, dribbling, elbow steering spawn of Satan. Anyone who sticks food to their bike is a disgrace IMHO.
Jono L is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet