![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Hi all,
I am looking at building a new light weight bike, incorporating a Rohloff hub. I have been getting into 6 hour cross country races but also want it to be good on road. I am looking to build a hardtail and have been suggested to use the Voodoo wanga frame, which has horizontal dropouts for the adjusting chain tension. My questions are would it be worth getting a carbon fibre frame manufactured for better performance? Also considering the hub and fame are going to cost a bit what other components should I fit for best value/performance ratio. Cheers Andrew
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 91
|
A custom built carbon frame sounds bloody expensive.
Google up Thorn cycles as they have some nice steel frames and bikes Rohloff specific with eccentric bottom brackets and a deeper left side vertical dropout which eliminates the torque arm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Yes I do remember seeing them now and looking again that does look very nice, similar to what I was wanting. The only reason I suggested the carbon fibre is because my cousins have carbonfibre Scotts and in comparison to my aluminium Trek they are ridiculous to pick up. It's a shame the hub is so expensive other wise I would think about the carbon fibre option more because it has to be of benefit both off and on the road.
Any thoughts on the eccentric bottom bracket versus the horizontal dropouts? I think I prefer the simplicity of the later, like on the voodoo frame but not moving the rear end around is probably stronger.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
|
The problem is if the frame is carbon and flexy, then the chain tension may be a problem. Maybe ask some single speed riders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Now I have started looking at forks, more confusion, so far I am beginning to think a Rock Shox Dart 2 would go ok, Fox seems very expensive. Cheers
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Roskilde, Denmark
Posts: 313
|
Been there done that. Doesn't matter if it is a hard tail, doesn't matter what material, with a Rohloff hub you will need a tensioner on a MTB or the chain will drop off. Unless of course the MTB is never seeing any rough ground.
Anyways, suggest a titanium frame, otherwise your hub will outlast the frame. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
|
It isn't different to single speed really. I am not a racer but it is my understanding downhill single speeders use chain tensioners because of the beating they take. Trail riders don't seem to need them. If you asked in a single speed forum, you might get a more enlightened answer.
I'm yet to have my chain come off and have done around 1000km of riding, 50% of that on dirt tracks. I don't deliberately do jumps or other crazy things but some of the trails I've done are pretty rough. My bike is a Kona Unit 29er (steel) single speed. Note single speed chain rings are in just the right position so the chain is in line with the rear cog, which could have been the other posters problem, unless he's just a hard core rider. Sheldon Brown talks about it on his web pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Yeah I thought this was one of the benefits of singlespeeds, the fact that the chain could hardly ever come off. My riding style is pretty tame so I doubt I am ever going to have a problem with the chain coming off a single speed or rohloff.
Cheers
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Roskilde, Denmark
Posts: 313
|
Well, if you rarely drop chains on a single speeder, you'll be OK I guess.
Another issue that comes to mind is getting the chain line straight. The cog on the Rohloff sits at 54 mm (but at 58mm if you use a 13 tooth cog) and it can be a pain to get the front ring to line up nicely, but you can fit some seriously fat tyres. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Why does the distance change depending on the size cog at the rear? shouldn't they be the same. I must admit I haven't ridden single speed but I know my riding style is very tame. Plus the chain should be fairly taught by using sliding dropouts so I am still not exactly seeing why it should come off bar getting something like a stick in it. But as I say tame riding I am sure there are plenty of other people who ride hard enough to get the to come off, though I wouldn't have thought frequently. But just my small bit of understanding.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,979
|
Quote:
Regardless, if you want to save some weight, go with V-brakes (at least, in the rear) instead of disc brakes rather than buying a carbon fibre frame to try to save weight. Consider "green"/(latex) inner tubes to save weight for your races. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
![]() Cheers
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Cheers
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. |
|
|
|
|