![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
One could argue that muscle fiber type makeup is more important, given that those with a higher percentage Type I and Type IIa have greater FTP than those with a similar VO2 max and more Type IIb fiber. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
So how does one find out what type of fibers they have? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
Muscle biopsy. One can also infer such to some degree from their Power Profile. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
yeah, I thought as much. ouchh! I think I prefer to infer rather than know for sure ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Take a look at Horowitz, J.F., et al. High efficiency of type I muscle fibers improves performance. International Journal of Sports Medicine 15(3):152-7, April 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 89
|
I have wondered many times as others about O2 delivery to the muscles as many other posters and it males lots of sense especially supraphysiological O2 carryng-capacity as well as Blood doping. HOwver those do not happen under normal situation and then are not considered physiological. Being devils´ advocate, if I were too skini and low VO2max but could replicate huge muscle power in my legs I could be the man....regardless of my VO2max,
On the other hand McArdle´s diseases is a disease where the muscle lacks of muscle posphorilase which inhinbits glycogen breakdaown and therefore glycolytic pathway. Therefore highly liming exercise performance, regardless that ventilatory thresholds are found similar in normal subjects or McArdle´s. That is another Non-Physiological condition, but also as in the opposite exapmle of O2 delifery, muscle metabolism es very important and to, me probably the limiting factor. IN the 70, 80, and low 90´s Cardiorespiratory physiological adaptations came down to lung capacity, cardiac output, capilarisation, VO2max...However moder physiology has turned into Exercise biochemistry and muscle metaolism, since what we are looking at now is at the cell and all the events occuring there, many of which are still unknown and the direction is that it seems that the limiting factor could be in that pathway. About CArdiorespiratory physiology and adaptations we know many things but not many about events at the cellular level. I believe there is not a single cause. Many of the causes we are talking about are a "requisite" to be elite, but Science still has not rpovided the answer, although modern studies are following the muscular metabolism pathway. Cheers. Last edited by Urkiola2 : 19-12.-2007 at 11:30 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
While I totally agree that there are various factors which contribute to aerobic performance (Dr. Coyle has published several outstanding papers on the subject that are freely available), VO2 Max is the ultimate limiter to aerobic performance. However, for individuals of equal VO2 Max, threshold power can vary significantly based upon 1) muscle fiber type and 2) training. Those who posses both a high VO2 Max and high percentage Type I fiber are at a significant advantage...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
Just wondering ....
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
This from a guy who doesn't like Friel? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 89
|
Ooops.--Sorry about the mistakes...It is late at night here and I did not double checked my English...so I edited again. Sorry
I have wondered many times as others about O2 delivery to the muscles as many other posters and it males lots of sense especially supraphysiological O2 carryng-capacity as well as Blood doping. HOwver those do not happen under normal situation and then are not considered physiological. Being devils´ advocate, if I were too skini and low VO2max but could replicate huge muscle power in my legs I could be the man....regardless of my VO2max, On the other hand McArdle´s diseases is a disease where the muscle lacks of muscle posphorilase which inhinbits glycogen breakdaown and therefore glycolytic pathway. Therefore highly liming exercise performance, regardless that ventilatory thresholds are found similar in normal subjects or McArdle´s. That is another Non-Physiological condition, but also as in the opposite exapmle of O2 delifery, muscle metabolism es very important and to, me probably the limiting factor. IN the 70, 80, and low 90´s Cardiorespiratory physiological adaptations came down to lung capacity, cardiac output, capilarisation, VO2max...However moder physiology has turned into Exercise biochemistry and muscle metaolism, since what we are looking at now is at the cell and all the events occuring there, many of which are still unknown and the direction is that it seems that the limiting factor could be in that pathway. About CArdiorespiratory physiology and adaptations we know many things but not many about events at the cellular level. I believe there is not a single cause. Many of the causes we are talking about are a "requisite" to be elite, but Science still has not rpovided the answer, although modern studies are following the muscular metabolism pathway. Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
I doubt this would occur as the best aerobic performers all have comparatively high VO2 Max as a prerequisite. Last edited by john979 : 19-12.-2007 at 11:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 89
|
[QUOTE=john979][QUOTE=Urkiola2]Being devils´ advocate, if I were too skini and low VO2max but could replicate huge muscle power in my legs I could be the man....regardless of my VO2max,
Quote:
It was just an extreme agument...although you would be very surprised sometimes...at least with elite cyclists. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
|
Do you have any specific examples?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 89
|
Quote:
As I mentoned several times before, VO2max is a prerequisite to be an elite athlete but it is actually a "poor" performance indicator for a same (homogeneous) group, especialy elite athletes. Anyone, and there are many labs worldwide, working with elite athletes could confirm you this. As I mentioned also, many elite athletes obtain their best performance years long after reaching their VO2max...and what I have observed is that the correlation between lactate oxidation ("washout") and drecreased blood lactate accumulation and performance is extremely tight. At least from my experience and results. That is for an individual athlete comparing with him/herself, but a very similar occurs with any elite athlete. For the most part, and again from my data working with very different sports, blood lactate accumulation is the laboratory´s diagnosis which discriminates the best among athletes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
I asked for the person's educated opinion of them. Surely no harm in that?
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|