![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
umm, I think you mean "zero positives for EPO." ![]()
__________________
Lance Armstrong’s Last Words, August 10, 2007 - “We're proud of our record. We won eight Tours, a Vuelta, a Giro and other races and not one positive test," Armstrong said. “I’m not sure if there are many other teams who can say that right now. Couple that with our ethical record, despite all the gossip and nonsense that goes on.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
|
Quote:
But we all know that the odds of 6 separate samples testing positive in a blind test and all later found to be Armstrong's, and for those tests to all have errors and be false-positives, is about 10 trillion to one against. So, he was using EPO in 1999, but there was no test then for EPO, and now its only a technicality on the lack of a B sample being available for confirmation, that he is able to spin more lies to his increasingly dwindling band of devoted followers. But let's not let the troll hijack the thread. Anyone know what BMC are doing next season?
__________________
Last edited by Crankyfeet : 13-12.-2007 at 10:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
|
Quote:
Ahh...that makes sense. Thanks. Same effect though.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
|
I will laugh my ass off if Bruyneel, Trek, and Fastana do not get a TdF invite.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: You are here => X
Posts: 10,812
|
Quote:
And I'm sure Astana would never stoop to anything backhanded/underhanded if they needed to. But its wrong of me to judge when I know so little. I'll make a bet that they get to ride in the TdF though Bro. I'll even give you odds.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 262
|
Quote:
I never said they didn't use drugs (re-read my post) I simply said they were never caught. And Armstrong's "positive EPO" tests were discounted by a third party hired by the UCI/French lab!! That's right. THEY hired him and he said there was no proof that the samples really belonged to Lance and/or were not tampered with. So, that's not a positive test. Again, i am not saying he didn't use, simply that it has never been proven. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 229
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
I agree, the Vrijman provided no legitimate reasons to discount the apparent fact that 6 of Armstrong's samples from the '99 Tour had exogenous EPO in them. What it did was point out that the proper protocols weren't followed to declare an adverse analytical finding, which we all knew anyway as the lab never intended to follow the protocols. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
|
Quote:
Uh, no. Vrijman, a lawyer who defends dopers, was not hired by the French lab. He was hired purely by the UCI, which was upset that they were being blamed for leaking Armstrong's test results. Vrijman's job was to do a hatchet job on LNDD and WADA. He did not want to talk to the French lab. He deliberately failed to go through the proper protocol (similar to the U.S.'s Freedom of Information Act) to obtain information from the lab and instead relied mostly on second hand information. Similarly he did not make any effort to obtain primary information from WADA. WADA on its own sent some info to Vrijman when WADA realized that he was not going to make an attempt to find anything that would explain WADA's side of the matter; Vrijman did no followup and there is no indication that he even read the WADA material. The Vrijman report was a whitewash of Armstrtong's dope use and an attack by the UCI on its perceived enemy, WADA. What role the money that Armstrong's paid to the UCI played is unexplained.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Downtown in the ATL
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
Please don't show your ignorance and confuse Treks deal with them being the primary sponsor of this cycling team, that's Astana. It's business and Trek is in the business of selling bikes. They're a big company with multiple products lines (Trek, Gary Fisher, Lemond, Klein, Bontrager) and they understand the players their working with. If you and your kangaroo court want to boycott any product used by a discredited doper, then be careful, you may be out of equipment soon. As for holding anyone accountable, the only way to do that is to remove the $$$ from the equation. That means give up the sport as you know it today. Give up your magazines, your expensive knock-off team kits, your enhanced technology, this forum and the ability to see any major tour coverage through mass media. As long as we live in a pay for play world and we have discretionary income that can be used to avail ourselves of this "entertainment" there will always be human beings looking to game the system. I for one have another reason today to stay away from Major League Baseball and put my discretionary entertainment dollars to use somewhere else, like buying a new Madone in Astana blue, assuming it comes with an IV port ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 229
|
Quote:
Last edited by Leafer : 14-12.-2007 at 07:17 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Downtown in the ATL
Posts: 183
|
Quote:
Why stop there? By your logic, since Nike, Giro, Sidi, Giardano, Continental, Shimano, Campy, and on and on and on...are all sponsors of doping teams, doping riders, the publications you read and the broadcasts you watch, then you should hold them accountable as well. Obviously "they" don't care about this sport either, do they? Or is that you just have a hard-on for a specific group of players in this sordid matter and like any other sport, whether football or wrestling or NASCAR, you're "team" is never as bad as "their" team? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 6,320
|
Quote:
There are many sponsors who have stuck with the French teams. Riis set up his anti-doping program when he feared losing sponsorship. T-Mobile was the one that insisted on change at its team. Soem sponsors have been willing to support Team Slipstream. The sponsors will make or break any attempt to clean the sport up. It is time to reward sponsors that support the fight against doping and punish sponsors that support the other side. In the past I have gone out of my way to purchase goods from companies that sponsor cycling teams. No longer. Now I will go out of my way to not purchase or recommend products from any company that sponsors a team that I perceive as circumventing the rules against doping. The wrath of Bro has been unleashed.
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 229
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|