![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-01-20, Theo Bekkers (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: > TimC wrote: >> How do I turn when I a have no hands on the handlebars (not that I >> would do that, your honour)? > > Body weight shift will actually turn the bars. Fair enough. >> Note that gyroscopic action is not what causes a bike to stay upright >> too - you can have two identical wheels rotating in the opposite >> direction as well as your two wheels contacting the ground, and still >> be able to balance your bike. > > I didn't understand what you said then. Please explain. I believe the > primary stabilisation factor is the wheels turning, no matter how light you > think they are. Build a bike where you mount two identical wheels that are rotating in the opposite sense at the same speed, so there is no net rotational momentum. Go forward. Marvel at not falling off. -- TimC I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. -- Linus Torvalds, 1991 |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"TimC" <tconnors@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote in message news:slrn-0.9.7.4-16492-10546-200801202346-tc@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au... > On 2008-01-20, Theo Bekkers (aka Bruce) > was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: >> TimC wrote: >>> How do I turn when I a have no hands on the handlebars (not that I >>> would do that, your honour)? >> >> Body weight shift will actually turn the bars. > > Fair enough. > >>> Note that gyroscopic action is not what causes a bike to stay upright >>> too - you can have two identical wheels rotating in the opposite >>> direction as well as your two wheels contacting the ground, and still >>> be able to balance your bike. >> >> I didn't understand what you said then. Please explain. I believe the >> primary stabilisation factor is the wheels turning, no matter how light >> you >> think they are. > > Build a bike where you mount two identical wheels that are rotating in > the opposite sense at the same speed, so there is no net rotational > momentum. Go forward. Marvel at not falling off. You can also balance perfectly well on a bike frame fitted out with skis instead of wheels. As I understand it, balance on a bike is essentially about keeping your base of suoopt under your centre of mass, as it is with keeping your balance any other time. The only real difference on a bike is that you're not statically stable so it's something of an active process. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 2008-01-20, Theo Bekkers <tbekkers@bekkers.com.au> wrote:
> TimC wrote: >> Theo Bekkers wrote >>> TimC wrote: > >>>> And I've tried it on my bike, with different results. I am yet to >>>> remain convinced that you can counter-steer on a bicycle. >>> >>> I'm convinced you can't steer it any other way. It's not optional. >> >> What about below 15km/h, as I think it was Zebee, said? > > The effect is far less. > >> How do I turn when I a have no hands on the handlebars (not that I >> would do that, your honour)? > > Body weight shift will actually turn the bars. > >> Note that gyroscopic action is not what causes a bike to stay upright >> too - you can have two identical wheels rotating in the opposite >> direction as well as your two wheels contacting the ground, and still >> be able to balance your bike. > > I didn't understand what you said then. Please explain. I believe the > primary stabilisation factor is the wheels turning, no matter how light you > think they are. > K.J. Atr"om from Lund University debunked this with a very long series of experiments, which including building a number of bikes with coutner-rotating wheels and many other oddities. The results are published in a peer-reviewed paper entitled "Bicycle Dynamics and Control" you can find a copy using Google Scholar. Cheers Joel -- Human Powered Cycles | High quality servicing and repairs joel@humanpowered.com.au | Affordable second hand bikes (03) 9029 6504 | www.humanpowered.com.au | CPF and RTCA Member |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jan 20, 2:12 am, Skewer <Thiscantw...@example.com> wrote:
> Travis wrote: > > Hi, a family member who has managed to reach 40 without ever having > > ridden a bike recently approached me for help with this. She's very > > short statured and required a kid's bike, to which I've attached > > training wheels suitably modified and beefed up to work with the > > medium size wheels on this bike. (Out of the box training wheels seem > > to assume that the bike they're to be fitted to will be for a toddler > > at most, they're tiny.) > > > Anyway, lessons haven't been going well. If I don't maintain an iron > > grip on the handlebars while running along side she's instantly off > > course and out of control. In effect she's not much more than a > > passenger of a bike which I am in control of. > > > I'm not prepared to concede that some people are just unteachable and > > that there is no hope whatsoever of her learning to ride a bike, so if > > anyone has any coaching tips which don't involve too much risk of > > injury I'd like to hear them! > > > If this works, there will be one less car... ![]() > > > Thanks > > > Travis > > Travis > > Maybe part of the problem is that she is being asked to learn too many > things (balancing/steering/pedaling/braking) in one go. Add to that not > trying to look foolish and a natural fear of possible injury. > > So, make the task simpler. > Take the pedals off and lower the seat so she can comfortably put both > feet flat on the ground. Let her then scoot around on level ground, > preferably grass, so she can concentrate on just balance & steering. > > Google points to advice here.http://www.bikeforums.net/archive/i...hp/t-94540.html > as well there is the A.B archive > 2.2.3 How do you teach an adult to ride?http://thehippy.net/Cycling/a_b_faq.htm#Sect2.1.3 > > -- > -- > Pete.B One more thing when you've set her up - tell her to teach herself. It has to come from inside, it's a feeling you get. If you stick around, you'll be the excuse and the punching bag. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jan 20, 6:47 am, Bleve <carl.I.bre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> agreed, ditch the trainer wheels (they don't help), off with the > pedals and learn to balance rolling down a very gentle hill on grass. > The rest is easy. Personally I think trainer wheels are counter-productive, and wouldn't recommend them for anyone. I find a scooter to be an excellent way of developing balance skills. Alternatively, as someone else pointed out, set the seat really low so that the rider can easily plant both feet on the ground and push around. I wouldn't go to the extent of removing the pedals. A large empty carpark with a gentle slope is a good thing. |
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Skewer wrote:
> > So, make the task simpler. > Take the pedals off and lower the seat so she can comfortably put both > feet flat on the ground. Let her then scoot around on level ground, > preferably grass, so she can concentrate on just balance & steering. > Yep, just got my daughter riding after 2 years of getting nowhere with training wheels, and 1 week of practice without pedals and a lower seat. DaveB |
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,308
|
Get rid of the trainer wheels.
Find a gentle grassy slope. I taught my daughter on the grassy slope outside the Boatshed Cafe next to the bike path in South Perth. Lots of gentle coasting down the slope. Graduating to the bike path. Rewarded by coffee/milkshake/muffin from the cafe. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:28:14 -0800 (PST), Travis
<travismorien@yahoo.com> wrote in aus.bicycle: > >I'm not prepared to concede that some people are just unteachable and >that there is no hope whatsoever of her learning to ride a bike, so if >anyone has any coaching tips which don't involve too much risk of >injury I'd like to hear them! I have taught 5 kids to ride bikes over the last 40 years and generally running behind and holding them upright behind the saddle has been sufficient. With one I removed the pedals and lowered the seat so they could scoot along for about half an hour to get the "feel" of balance My youngest however was looking impossible to teach, absolutely nothing worked. In a stroke of genious (OK luck) I bought a scooter for a few dollars from the Sally Army shop. This seemed to be the perfect platform for learning about balance and once he got the hang of that getting on the bike took about 5 minutes. Then it was a battle to get him off the bike. So iff nothing else works try a scooter first until they can stand on and balance then the bike will be easy. Regards Harold Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum - Lucretius |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jan 20, 11:22 pm, "Theo Bekkers" <tbekk...@bekkers.com.au> wrote:
> > Note that gyroscopic action is not what causes a bike to stay upright > > too - you can have two identical wheels rotating in the opposite > > direction as well as your two wheels contacting the ground, and still > > be able to balance your bike. > > I didn't understand what you said then. Please explain. I believe the > primary stabilisation factor is the wheels turning, no matter how light you > think they are. You are incorrect. |
|